Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Isak Arvidsson vs Ace Matias Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Arvidsson vs Matias analysis and find out who is favored!
Isak Arvidsson vs Ace Matias Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Arvidsson has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Matias has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Arvidsson, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Matias has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Arvidsson has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Matias has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Arvidsson has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Matias winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Arvidsson has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 19/ 13), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 90/ 70). Matias has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 42% (W/L 5/ 7), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Arvidsson winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Arvidsson winning 2 and Matias winning 0. The last match between Arvidsson and Matias was at the USA F5, 25-01-2016, Pre-Q round, Clay with Isak Arvidsson getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Arvidsson and Matias have played a deciding set 0 times, with Arvidsson winning 0 times and Matias 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Arvidsson winning 0, and Matias 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Arvidsson has played against opponents with an average rank of while Matias has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Arvidsson has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Matias has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Arvidsson has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Matias has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Arvidsson 1 - 0 Matias
Ret.
Rank
489
High
31
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
31
Age
Plays
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
Form
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
57% (163-123)
Career Total W/L
41% (7-10)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$3,985
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Isak Arvidsson | Ace Matias |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Isak Arvidsson | Ace Matias |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Isak Arvidsson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Paul-Henri Mathieu
Player
Isak Arvidsson
43%
(
20 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
3
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Renzo Olivo
Player
Isak Arvidsson
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
67%
(
57 of
85)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
43 of
57)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
23 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
85)
81
Total Points Won
75
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Isak Arvidsson
Player
Vaclav Safranek
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Isak Arvidsson
Player
Christian Samuelsson
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve %
52%
(
50 of
96)
11
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
8
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
38 of
50)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
22 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
96)
97
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Isak Arvidsson
Player
Filip Bergevi
64%
(
58 of
90)
1st Serve %
50%
(
44 of
88)
12
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
26 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
29 of
88)
93
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(5) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Toshihide Matsui
Player
Isak Arvidsson
69%
(
88 of
127)
1st Serve %
61%
(
58 of
95)
8
Aces
15
2
Double Faults
7
63%
(
55 of
88)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
44 of
58)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
39%
(
50 of
127)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
95)
113
Total Points Won
109
|
6-7(4) 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Dennis Novak
Player
Isak Arvidsson
53%
(
31 of
58)
1st Serve %
51%
(
28 of
55)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christian Lindell
Player
Isak Arvidsson
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Isak Arvidsson
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
85)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
85)
83
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(3) 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Isak Arvidsson
Player
Jonathan Mridha
66%
(
51 of
77)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
32 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
76
Total Points Won
57
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Ace Matias Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Pre-Q | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Pre-Q | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Pre-Q | 6-2 7-6(1) | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-7(2) 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-7(3) 6-1 7-5 | H2H | |||
view more
Arvidsson Vs Matias Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
