Prediction of Isabella Shinikova [345th] vs Madelief Hageman [844th] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W W W W W L
Form
L L L W L L W W L LHead-2-Head: Shinikova 1 - 0 Hageman
They have played 2 sets in total, with Shinikova winning 2 and Hageman winning 0. The last match between Shinikova and Hageman was at the W15 Sharm ElSheikh, 13-03-2025, Second, Hard with Isabella Shinikova getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Isabella Shinikova | 1 |
| Madelief Hageman | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Isabella Shinikova
Player
Madelief Hageman
47%
(
21 of
45)
1st Serve %
80%
(
40 of
50)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
90%
(
19 of
21)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
55
Total Points Won
40
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:9:43 | Average Match Time | 1:9:43 |
| 47% (21/45) | 1st Serve % | 80% (40/50) |
| 90% (19/21) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (24/40) |
| 63% (15/24) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (5/10) |
| 75% (3/4) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/4) |
| 42% (21/50) | Return Points Win % | 24% (11/45) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Isabella Shinikova vs Madelief Hageman Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Shinikova 1 - 0 Hageman
Editorial Prediction:
Analyzing recent performances, Shinikova has shown a stronger second serve, winning 41.66% of points in the last six months. In comparison, Hageman has won 38.55% of points on their second serve. These statistics are closely linked to match prediction accuracy and can often determine the likely victor.
On return games, Shinikova has won 49.24% of her opponent's second serve points in recent form, while Hageman has a slightly better performance at 50%. For first serve returns, Hageman outperforms Shinikova with a 36.55% success rate compared to Shinikova's 31.43%, which can tip the scale in favor of the player with the higher percentage in this matchup.
Considering pressure situations, Shinikova has an edge, having saved 47.53% of breakpoints, whereas Hageman has managed to save 46.81%. This can be advantageous for predicting game outcomes during pressure situations.
Overall match performance over the past year gives Shinikova a significant lead, with a win rate of 60% (42/28), while Hageman has only achieved a 44.23% win rate (23/29). This overall performance provides a broader context for head-to-head predictions.
When examining surface preferences, Shinikova excels on Hard courts with a career win percentage of 66% (179/92), contrasting with her weaker performance on Grass courts, winning 25% (4/12). On the other hand, Hageman shows her best on Indoor Hard surfaces with a 50% win rate (1/1) but struggles on Hard courts at 38% (9/15).
In terms of competitive level, Shinikova predominantly competes in Challengers/ITF tournaments over $10K, winning 51.16% of her matches (22/21). Hageman, competing mostly in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments at $10K, secures 45.24% of wins (19/23). The level of competition faced by each player can influence predictions.
Player quality analysis indicates Shinikova has faced tougher opponents, with an average opponent rank of 185.2, compared to Hageman’s opponents, averaging a rank of 370.29 over the last 12 months. This indicates Shinikova has been competing at a higher level, which is pivotal in determining potential match outcomes.
In deciding set performances, Shinikova leads slightly, winning 55% of these tight situations, while Hageman has a 50% success rate. In closely contested matches, this could be a decisive factor.
Though historical performance is vital for predictions, current event statistics can point to players in better form. Therefore, assessing any matches played in this event is crucial. Special consideration should also be given to players with a known affinity for performing better at specific events.
For break point conversion, Hageman has a superior recent record, converting 41.55% of breakpoints compared to Shinikova’s 38.24%. This can play a crucial role during pivotal moments in the match.
Given these comparative statistics, Shinikova appears favored for the upcoming match. Her higher performance levels in various critical areas suggest she is likely to secure victory.
Isabella Shinikova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Haruka Kaji
Player
Isabella Shinikova
76%
(
74 of
98)
1st Serve %
62%
(
68 of
110)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
62%
(
46 of
74)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
52 of
110)
111
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Isabella Shinikova
Player
Victoria Allen
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
64%
(
29 of
45)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Isabella Shinikova
Player
Daria Zelinskaya
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Isabella Shinikova
Player
Sofia Shapatava
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
61%
(
14 of
23)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
44%
(
17 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
55
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Isabella Shinikova
Player
Zuzanna Pawlikowska
62%
(
47 of
76)
1st Serve %
70%
(
63 of
90)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
44 of
90)
92
Total Points Won
74
|
6-1 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Isabella Shinikova
Player
Maria Kalyakina
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
50%
(
21 of
42)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Isabella Shinikova
Player
Julita Saner
62%
(
58 of
93)
1st Serve %
78%
(
77 of
99)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
53%
(
9 of
17)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
46%
(
43 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
56 of
99)
106
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Isabella Shinikova
Player
Danielle Daley
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve %
54%
(
21 of
39)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
53
Total Points Won
26
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Anna Siskova
Player
Isabella Shinikova
77%
(
48 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
25 of
44)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Isabella Shinikova
Player
Ines Murta
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve %
73%
(
52 of
71)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Madelief Hageman Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Weronika Ewald
Player
Madelief Hageman
60%
(
45 of
75)
1st Serve %
66%
(
51 of
77)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
1
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
33%
(
10 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
48%
(
36 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
42 of
77)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Karola Patricia Bejenaru
Player
Madelief Hageman
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Madelief Hageman
Player
Rinon Okuwaki
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
29 of
43)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madelief Hageman
Player
Elena Grekul
57%
(
4 of
7)
1st Serve %
100%
(
5 of
5)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
100%
(
4 of
4)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
0%
(
0 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Rtn Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
5
Total Points Won
7
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carolyn Ansari
Player
Madelief Hageman
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
0
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Isabella Shinikova
Player
Madelief Hageman
47%
(
21 of
45)
1st Serve %
80%
(
40 of
50)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
90%
(
19 of
21)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
55
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madelief Hageman
Player
Yoana Moneva
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
49%
(
23 of
47)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
8
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gina Marie Dittmann
Player
Madelief Hageman
66%
(
73 of
111)
1st Serve %
66%
(
83 of
125)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
49 of
83)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
44%
(
49 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
54 of
125)
116
Total Points Won
120
|
4-6 6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kaili Demi Teso
Player
Madelief Hageman
70%
(
55 of
79)
1st Serve %
69%
(
52 of
75)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
31 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eva Guerrero Alvarez
Player
Madelief Hageman
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
10 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (617/410) | Win/Loss | 48% (109/116) |
| 58% (1362/1002) | Sets Win/Loss | 48% (246/270) |
| 53% (11471/10196) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (2419/2353) |
| 0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 1551 | Aces Total | 139 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 2665 | Total Double Faults | 477 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:14:39 |
| 557.66 | Average Opponent Rank | 312.61 |
| 60% (26176/43647) | 1st Serve % | 64% (6582/10245) |
| 63% (16498/26176) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (3707/6582) |
| 45% (7860/17472) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (1578/3663) |
| 49% (2801/5667) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (654/1344) |
| 47% (20443/43857) | Return Points Win % | 47% (4801/10195) |
| 60% (611/1020) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 48% (109/225) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 53% (110/209) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 17% (6/35) |
| 58% (181/314) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (38/66) |
| 88% (587/519) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (104/90) |
| 12% (587/68) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (104/14) |
| 22% (439/97) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (121/19) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
