Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Isabella Kruger vs Noa LIAUW A Fong Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kruger vs Fong analysis and find out who is favored!
Isabella Kruger vs Noa LIAUW A Fong Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kruger has won 43.85% of points on his second serve, while Fong has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kruger, in recent form, has won 51.01% of his opponent's second serve points, while Fong has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.9% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kruger has saved 63.83% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fong has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kruger has won 56.25% of matches played (W/L 9/ 7), with Fong winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kruger has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 71% (W/L 5/ 2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 52/ 36). Fong has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Kruger has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.25% of matches (W/L 9/ 7), where as Fong has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kruger has played against opponents with an average rank of 271.25 while Fong has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kruger has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fong has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kruger has converted 48.48% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fong has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Kruger 0 - 0 Fong
N/A
Rank
High
19
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Isabella Kruger | Noa LIAUW A Fong |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 60% (3/2) | 1st Match |
| Sets Win/Loss | 50% (6/6) | 1st Match |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (48/51) | 1st Match |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 1st Match |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Aces pg | 0.27 | 1st Match |
| Aces Total | 13 | 1st Match |
| DFs per game | 0.73 | 1st Match |
| DFs Total | 35 | 1st Match |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:12 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 172 | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (190/320) | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (124/190) | 1st Match |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (57/130) | 1st Match |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (16/33) | 1st Match |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (145/336) | 1st Match |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Challenger W/L | 60% (3/2) | 1st Match |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (2/4) | 1st Match |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 1st Match |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (2/3) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (3/0) | 1st Match |
Isabella Kruger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Jaeda Daniel
Player
Isabella Kruger
69%
(
58 of
84)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
44%
(
37 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
78
|
6-1 0-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Isabella Kruger
Player
Maddalena Giordano
41%
(
20 of
49)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
4
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
2
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Laura Pigossi
Player
Isabella Kruger
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Isabella Kruger
Player
Ekaterina Shalimova
64%
(
65 of
101)
1st Serve %
42%
(
38 of
90)
4
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
4
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
44%
(
44 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
35 of
90)
92
Total Points Won
99
|
7-6(4) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Isabella Kruger
Player
Indy De Vroome
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve %
43%
(
21 of
49)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
12
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
18 of
21)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
13 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
44
Total Points Won
42
|
3-6 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasiia Gureva
Player
Isabella Kruger
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
21 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
86)
85
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Isabella Kruger
Player
Daniela Seguel
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
19 of
50)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Isabella Kruger
Player
Min Liu
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
3
Aces
3
10
Double Faults
2
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
27%
(
6 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
42%
(
24 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eudice Wong Chong
Player
Isabella Kruger
65%
(
53 of
81)
1st Serve %
59%
(
61 of
103)
1
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
8
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
35 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
54 of
103)
100
Total Points Won
84
|
6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Isabella Kruger
Player
Teresa Franco Dias
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve %
48%
(
24 of
50)
2
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
4
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
11 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Noa LIAUW A Fong Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Ayline Esina Samardzic
Player
Noa Liauw A Fong
61%
(
68 of
111)
1st Serve %
74%
(
64 of
87)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
4
50%
(
34 of
68)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
56 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
47 of
87)
102
Total Points Won
96
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Katarina Kuzmova
Player
Noa Liauw A Fong
43%
(
17 of
40)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
7
88%
(
15 of
17)
1st Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
12 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gaia Parravicini
Player
Noa Liauw A Fong
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
65%
(
26 of
40)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
9
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 4-6 7-6(5) 10-8 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Evialina Laskevich
Player
Noa Liauw A Fong
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
72%
(
42 of
58)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Noa Liauw A Fong
Player
Maya Drozd
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
40%
(
17 of
43)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
5
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
30 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Kruger Vs Fong Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
