I. M. Bara
To Win
I. Oz
To Win
Ipek Oz vs Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L L L W W L L
Form
W L L L W W W L L LHead-to-head: Oz 1 - 1 Kasintseva
They have played 5 sets in total, with Oz winning 3 and Kasintseva winning 2. The last match between Oz and Kasintseva was at the W75 Prague, 18-02-2025, First, I.hard with Ipek Oz getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
W75 Prague(18-02-2025)
6
2
6
2
44% (4-5)
YTD Win/Loss
45% (5-6)
1
Head-to-Head
1
225
Ranking
150
163
Highest Rank
121
25
Age
19
-
Plays
-
5
Titles
5
55% (271-223)
Career Total W/L
58% (139-102)
$82,295
Career Prize Money
$90,600
0
YTD Titles
0
0
Hard H2H
0
0
Clay H2H
1
1
Indoor H2H
0
0
Grass H2H
0
Upcoming Match
16 Mar 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Draper VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp
15 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Sabalenka VS Andreeva PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells wta
15 Mar 2025 / Final
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Oz VS Kasintseva H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats 
Ipek Oz
Player
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
||||
| 7-6(3) 1-6 6-2 |
Stats
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
Player
Ipek Oz
60%
(
65 of
109)
1st Serve %
66%
(
67 of
101)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
55%
(
24 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
40%
(
44 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
101)
105
Total Points Won
105
|
||||
Oz VS Kasintseva H2H Stats
Stats
1
H2H Matches
1
3
Sets Won
2
26
Games Won
18
1
Aces (Total)
4
2
Total Double Faults
9
1:55:8
Average Match Time
1:55:8
67% (98/146)
1st Serve %
59% (92/155)
66% (65/98)
1st Serve Win %
61% (56/92)
60% (29/48)
2nd Serve Win %
51% (32/63)
35% (8/23)
Break Points Won % (Total)
38% (3/8)
43% (67/155)
Return Points Win %
36% (52/146)
50% (1/2)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
50% (1/2)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
100% (1/1)
0% (0/1)
Deciding Set Win %
100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
100% (1/1)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (1/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (1/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Ipek Oz vs Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Ipek Oz 1 - 1 Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
- Recent form and second serve performance: Analysis of their recent performance over the past six months reveals that Oz has displayed a commendable second serve performance, winning an impressive 50.53% of points. On the other hand, Kasintseva has also exhibited a respectable performance, securing victory in 47.43% of second serve points. It is worth noting the strong correlation between this particular statistic and the accuracy of match predictions.
- Return game prowess and recent form: The return game statistics shed light on the players' capabilities in recent matches. In this regard, Oz has proven to be formidable, winning an impressive 52.94% of their opponent's second serve points. Conversely, Kasintseva has showcased her skills by triumphing in 55.69% of such points. For first serve returns, Oz has secured victory in 37.14% of instances, while Kasintseva has achieved a slightly higher success rate of 38.55%. These figures carry great significance in predicting the favorability of this head-to-head matchup.
- Thriving under pressure: When under pressure, Oz has managed to save a considerable 54.86% of breakpoints in recent matches. In comparison, Kasintseva has demonstrated her resilience by saving an impressive 59.28% of breakpoints. This statistic is invaluable when making predictions for in-game betting.
- Performance overview: Over the course of the past year, Oz has showcased their competence by winning 54.17% of matches played, with a win-loss record of 39-33. In contrast, Kasintseva has outperformed with a remarkable winning percentage of 61.04% and a win-loss record of 47-30. Considering these noteworthy achievements, a comprehensive head-to-head prediction overview emerges.
- Surface superiority: Analyzing their performance on different surfaces reveals interesting patterns. Oz boasts an impressive career surface win percentage of 58% on clay, with a win-loss record of 205-146. Conversely, their performance on hard courts has been relatively weaker, with a win percentage of 43% (36-48). Kasintseva, on the other hand, shines on clay with a career surface win percentage of 62% (83-51), while struggling on indoor hard courts with a win percentage of 41% (9-13).
- Player level and tournament selection: Examining the level at which the players have competed is crucial when predicting favorites. In the past year, Oz has predominantly participated in the challenging Challenger/ITF tournaments (>$10K), winning 55.38% of their matches (36-29). Similarly, Kasintseva has primarily played in these tournaments, achieving an impressive 64.71% success rate (44-24). The players' statistics must be assessed in the context of the event levels they have been competing in.
- Previous head-to-head encounters: Oz and Kasintseva have clashed once before, resulting in a victory for the latter. They have contested three sets in total, with Oz emerging triumphant in one set, while Kasintseva dominated with two wins. Their most recent encounter transpired at the LP Open by IND - Colina on August 11, 2022, on a clay court, where Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva secured a hard-fought victory with a scoreline of 7-6(3), 1-6, 6-2.
- Duration of head-to-head matches: Drawing on past head-to-head matches, it is notable that the average duration of matches between these players amounts to 2 hours, 44 minutes, and 8 seconds.
- Predicting the deciding set: In the event that this match reaches a deciding set, historical data indicates that Oz and Kasintseva have encountered such situations once before. Oz has come up short in winning any of these deciding sets, while Kasintseva has emerged victorious on one occasion. This information proves particularly useful in predicting the outcome if this match were to reach its climax.
- Head-to-head in high-pressure situations: Throughout their encounters, Oz and Kasintseva have engaged in one tiebreak. In this nail-biting scenario, Oz failed to claim victory, whereas Kasintseva triumphed.
- Opponent quality statistics: Evaluating the level of opponents faced by the players over the past 12 months unveils noteworthy insights. Oz has consistently encountered adversaries with an average rank of 261.89, while Kasintseva has faced players with an average rank of 278.9.
- Decisive set performance compared to all players: Examining each player's performance in decisive sets carries significant weight. Over the past 12 months, Oz has recorded victory in 56% of deciding sets, while Kasintseva boasts a success rate of 50% in all matches played on the tour.
- Current event head-to-head statistics: Although previous player performance provides valuable information for predicting tennis matches, it is equally crucial to consider current event statistics when players are in top form. To gain insights into the players' current capabilities, refer to the section below (if they have participated in matches within the current event). Furthermore, it is important to acknowledge that some players excel in particular events, and this factor should be taken into account when predicting the match outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent competitions, Oz has capitalized on 41.12% of breakpoint opportunities, while Kasintseva has demonstrated exceptional proficiency by converting 50.94% of chances to break their opponents' serve. This particular statistic serves as a crucial aspect when providing live betting tips, especially when either player finds themselves in a pivotal moment of holding a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that effectively predict tennis match outcomes, consider referring to this insightful article. However, be advised that its content caters primarily to statistics enthusiasts.
Ipek Oz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Yara Bartashevich
Player
Ipek Oz
71%
(
79 of
111)
1st Serve %
66%
(
67 of
102)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
68%
(
54 of
79)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
39 of
67)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
43 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
47 of
102)
115
Total Points Won
98
|
6-7(3) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nikola Bartunkova
Player
Ipek Oz
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
57%
(
17 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ipek Oz
Player
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ipek Oz
Player
Martha Matoula
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
73%
(
45 of
62)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
12%
(
2 of
17)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Katie Volynets
Player
Ipek Oz
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve %
72%
(
33 of
46)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jana Kolodynska
Player
Ipek Oz
66%
(
80 of
121)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
61%
(
49 of
80)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
41%
(
17 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
45%
(
55 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
105
Total Points Won
101
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Taylah Preston
Player
Ipek Oz
53%
(
39 of
73)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
1
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
7
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
42%
(
31 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ipek Oz
Player
Elena Pridankina
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve %
70%
(
35 of
50)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
56
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ipek Oz
Player
Dominika Salkova
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
52%
(
47 of
90)
5
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
16
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
14 of
43)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
30 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
49 of
90)
88
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Erika Andreeva
Player
Ipek Oz
65%
(
57 of
88)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
0
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
19 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Elena Pridankina
Player
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
71%
(
12 of
17)
1st Serve %
65%
(
11 of
17)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
58%
(
7 of
12)
1st Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
60%
(
3 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
12 of
17)
22
Total Points Won
12
|
5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ipek Oz
Player
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Manon Leonard
Player
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
79)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
0
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
75
Total Points Won
77
|
1-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
Player
Margaux Rouvroy
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
Player
Gabriela Andrea Knutson
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
13 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
Player
Julia Avdeeva
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
61)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
16 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
19 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mia Ristic
Player
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anca Alexia Todoni
Player
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
3
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
6
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
35 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
79)
89
Total Points Won
77
|
6-1 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bernarda Pera
Player
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
69%
(
48 of
70)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
Player
Jodie Anna Burrage
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve %
59%
(
23 of
39)
2
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
2
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
55% (271/223)
Win/Loss
58% (139/102)
55% (616/511)
Sets Win/Loss
57% (314/233)
52% (5228/4808)
Games Win/Loss
53% (2629/2298)
43% (36/48)
Hard Win/Loss
57% (45/34)
58% (205/146)
Clay Win/Loss
62% (83/51)
51% (27/26)
Indoor Hard W/L
38% (9/15)
50% (3/3)
Grass Win/Loss
50% (2/2)
0.1
Aces Per Game
0.11
508
Aces Total
259
0.14
Double Faults Per Game
0.32
691
Total Double Faults
765
1:28:4
Average Match Time
1:36:56
446.2
Average Opponent Rank
363.21
71% (20007/28164)
1st Serve %
64% (9868/15402)
59% (11707/20007)
1st Serve Win %
60% (5962/9868)
50% (4055/8157)
2nd Serve Win %
47% (2580/5534)
48% (1752/3653)
Break Points Won % (Total)
50% (988/1983)
46% (13215/28850)
Return Points Win %
47% (7320/15567)
22% (2/7)
Slam W/L
31% (5/11)
0% (0/5)
Masters W/L
17% (1/5)
67% (6/3)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
33% (7/14)
Main Tour W/L
50% (7/7)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
56% (151/119)
Challenger W/L
63% (120/71)
58% (105/75)
Futures W/L
43% (6/8)
55% (264/482)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
58% (138/237)
50% (1/2)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
44% (36/82)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
56% (24/43)
46% (68/147)
Deciding Set Win %
46% (32/69)
84% (285/238)
1st Set Won, Won Match
84% (148/125)
16% (285/46)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
16% (148/23)
16% (209/33)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
15% (93/14)
See recent tennis photos of Oz and Kasintseva
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
