Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ipek Oz vs Emily Welker Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Oz vs Welker analysis and find out who is favored!
Ipek Oz vs Emily Welker Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Oz has won 48.8% of points on his second serve, while Welker has won 45.83%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Oz, in recent form, has won 53.16% of his opponent's second serve points, while Welker has won 57.95%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.4% and 41.73% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Oz has saved 55.09% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Welker has saved 46.84% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Oz has won 58.11% of matches played (W/L 43/ 31), with Welker winning 54.76% (W/L 23/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Oz has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 190/ 130), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Welker has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 8/ 4), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 38/ 40).
- Player level: In the last year, Oz has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 61.54% of matches (W/L 40/ 25), where as Welker has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 45.45% of matches (W/L 10/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Oz winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Oz winning 2 and Welker winning 0. The last match between Oz and Welker was at the W15 Antalya, 07-01-2021, First, Clay with Ipek Oz getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:18:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Oz and Welker have played a deciding set 0 times, with Oz winning 0 times and Welker 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Oz winning 0, and Welker 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Oz has played against opponents with an average rank of 312.28 while Welker has played against players with an average rank of 178.62.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Oz has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Welker has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Oz has converted 50.51% of breakpoint opportunities, and Welker has converted 44.17% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Oz 1 - 0 Welker
197
Rank
163
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
766
Rank
593
High
23
Age
Plays
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
Form
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
56% (242-193)
Career Total W/L
54% (111-94)
60% (12-8)
YTD W/L
0% (0-1)
$42,295
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Ipek Oz | Emily Welker |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:18:0 | 1:18:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 82% (37/45) | 71% (36/51) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 68% (25/37) | 53% (19/36) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 88% (7/8) | 20% (3/15) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 63% (5/8) | 50% (1/2) |
| Return Points W% | 57% (29/51) | 29% (13/45) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats 
Ipek Oz
Player
Emily Welker
82%
(
37 of
45)
1st Serve %
71%
(
36 of
51)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
88%
(
7 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ipek Oz | Emily Welker |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 60% (12/8) | 0% (0/1) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 56% (25/20) | 33% (1/2) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (211/204) | 43% (13/17) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 75% (6/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (6/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.15 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 31 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.13 | 0.2 |
| DFs Total | 26 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 293.7 | 810 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (815/1196) | 66% (67/101) |
| 1st Serve W% | 60% (488/815) | 46% (31/67) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (185/381) | 35% (12/34) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (64/131) | 41% (7/17) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (505/1190) | 48% (54/112) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 63% (10/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 61% (11/18) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 90% (10/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 10% (10/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 30% (10/3) | 0% (1/0) |
Ipek Oz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 1 | 6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
| F |
Stats
Jana Fett
Player
Ipek Oz
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ipek Oz
Player
Stephanie Wagner
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
71)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
41%
(
14 of
34)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
49%
(
25 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
43 of
71)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ipek Oz
Player
Barbora Palicova
77%
(
73 of
95)
1st Serve %
72%
(
46 of
64)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
39 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
85
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ipek Oz
Player
Simona Waltert
71%
(
64 of
90)
1st Serve %
62%
(
54 of
87)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
53%
(
34 of
64)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
47%
(
42 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
40 of
87)
88
Total Points Won
89
|
1-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ipek Oz
Player
Dejana Radanovic
63%
(
49 of
78)
1st Serve %
53%
(
42 of
80)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
83
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Timea Babos
Player
Ipek Oz
73%
(
60 of
82)
1st Serve %
72%
(
51 of
71)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
34 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
84
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tereza Valentova
Player
Ipek Oz
74%
(
48 of
65)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
0
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
70
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ipek Oz
Player
Mona Barthel
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Emily Welker Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Noelia Bouzo Zanotti
Player
Emily Welker
64%
(
72 of
112)
1st Serve %
66%
(
67 of
101)
-
Aces
-
8
Double Faults
3
54%
(
39 of
72)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
75%
(
9 of
12)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
48%
(
54 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
58 of
101)
116
Total Points Won
97
|
7-6(1) 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Carson Branstine
Player
Emily Welker
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
50%
(
22 of
44)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Emily Welker
Player
Selina Dal
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve %
81%
(
38 of
47)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emily Welker
Player
Chengyiyi Yuan
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
46%
(
19 of
41)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
11
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
22)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
26
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emily Welker
Player
Luise Reisel
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
49%
(
26 of
53)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
6
60%
(
15 of
25)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emily Welker
Player
Amelie Smejkalova
75%
(
75 of
100)
1st Serve %
78%
(
76 of
97)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
60%
(
45 of
75)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
44 of
76)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
44%
(
44 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
43 of
97)
99
Total Points Won
98
|
2-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Carson Branstine
Player
Emily Welker
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
73%
(
44 of
60)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emily Welker
Player
Julia Konishi Camargo Silva
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve %
55%
(
21 of
38)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
55
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emily Welker
Player
Marija Semenistaja
77%
(
48 of
62)
1st Serve %
66%
(
46 of
70)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
8
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
40 of
70)
80
Total Points Won
52
|
4-6 6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mika Stojsavljevic
Player
Emily Welker
52%
(
34 of
66)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
9
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
73
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Oz Vs Welker Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
