Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ipek Oz vs Daniela Vismane Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Oz vs Vismane analysis and find out who is favored!
Ipek Oz vs Daniela Vismane Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Oz has won 48.8% of points on his second serve, while Vismane has won 45.66%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Oz, in recent form, has won 53.16% of his opponent's second serve points, while Vismane has won 54.23%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.4% and 43.88% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Oz has saved 55.09% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Vismane has saved 53.16% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Oz has won 58.33% of matches played (W/L 42/ 30), with Vismane winning 54.84% (W/L 34/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Oz has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 190/ 130), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Vismane has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 27/ 13), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Oz has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 61.9% of matches (W/L 39/ 24), where as Vismane has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 51.92% of matches (W/L 27/ 25). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Oz winning 1 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Oz winning 3 and Vismane winning 3. The last match between Oz and Vismane was at the W40 Lisbon, 04-10-2023, First, Clay with Daniela Vismane getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:13:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Oz and Vismane have played a deciding set 1 times, with Oz winning 0 times and Vismane 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Oz winning 0, and Vismane 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Oz has played against opponents with an average rank of 307.44 while Vismane has played against players with an average rank of 327.05.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Oz has won 54% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Vismane has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Oz has converted 50.51% of breakpoint opportunities, and Vismane has converted 47.76% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Oz 1 - 2 Vismane
197
Rank
163
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total2
0
Hard0
1
Clay2
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
371
Rank
228
High
23
Age
Plays
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
Form
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
56% (242-193)
Career Total W/L
62% (230-142)
60% (12-8)
YTD W/L
59% (13-9)
$42,295
Career Prize Money
$34,000
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Ipek Oz | Daniela Vismane |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 3 |
| Games Won | 21 | 20 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 7 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:13:0 | 1:13:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 76% (120/157) | 67% (91/136) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 61% (73/120) | 63% (57/91) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 46% (17/37) | 49% (22/45) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 32% (6/19) | 33% (7/21) |
| Return Points W% | 42% (57/136) | 43% (67/157) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 50% (2/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-1 ret. |
Stats 
Daniela Vismane
Player
Ipek Oz
100%
(
4 of
4)
1st Serve %
63%
(
10 of
16)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
100%
(
4 of
4)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
0%
(
0 of
0)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
12
Total Points Won
8
|
||||
| 3-6 6-1 6-1 |
Stats
Daniela Vismane
Player
Ipek Oz
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
80%
(
78 of
98)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
42 of
78)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
47 of
98)
91
Total Points Won
71
|
||||
| 6-3 6-0 |
Stats
Ipek Oz
Player
Daniela Vismane
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
43
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ipek Oz | Daniela Vismane |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 60% (12/8) | 59% (13/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 56% (25/20) | 50% (25/25) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (211/204) | 50% (228/232) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 75% (6/2) | 59% (13/9) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (6/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.15 | 0.02 |
| Aces Total | 31 | 5 |
| DFs per game | 0.13 | 0.15 |
| DFs Total | 26 | 35 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:50:38 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 293.7 | 232.77 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (815/1196) | 72% (1041/1441) |
| 1st Serve W% | 60% (488/815) | 54% (567/1041) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (185/381) | 47% (189/400) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (64/131) | 48% (100/209) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (505/1190) | 48% (739/1534) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (2/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 63% (10/6) | 46% (6/7) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 88% (7/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 61% (11/18) | 55% (11/20) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 57% (4/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (3/3) | 75% (6/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 90% (10/9) | 90% (10/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 10% (10/1) | 10% (10/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 30% (10/3) | 17% (12/2) |
Ipek Oz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 1 | 6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
| F |
Stats
Jana Fett
Player
Ipek Oz
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ipek Oz
Player
Stephanie Wagner
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
71)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
41%
(
14 of
34)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
49%
(
25 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
43 of
71)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ipek Oz
Player
Barbora Palicova
77%
(
73 of
95)
1st Serve %
72%
(
46 of
64)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
39 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
85
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ipek Oz
Player
Simona Waltert
71%
(
64 of
90)
1st Serve %
62%
(
54 of
87)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
53%
(
34 of
64)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
47%
(
42 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
40 of
87)
88
Total Points Won
89
|
1-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ipek Oz
Player
Dejana Radanovic
63%
(
49 of
78)
1st Serve %
53%
(
42 of
80)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
83
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Timea Babos
Player
Ipek Oz
73%
(
60 of
82)
1st Serve %
72%
(
51 of
71)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
34 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
84
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tereza Valentova
Player
Ipek Oz
74%
(
48 of
65)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
0
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
70
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ipek Oz
Player
Mona Barthel
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniela Vismane Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Simona Waltert
Player
Daniela Vismane
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
85%
(
33 of
39)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 | 6-0 7-5 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Hanne Vandewinkel
Player
Daniela Vismane
78%
(
66 of
85)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
2
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
3
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
40%
(
34 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
80
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(4) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniela Vismane
Player
Ekaterina Reyngold
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniela Vismane
Player
Lea Boskovic
78%
(
67 of
86)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
92)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
32 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
92)
94
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(3) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Iva Primorac
Player
Daniela Vismane
35%
(
19 of
54)
1st Serve %
70%
(
44 of
63)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
1
79%
(
15 of
19)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniela Vismane
Player
Ana Giraldi Requena
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
78%
(
49 of
63)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
5
53%
(
18 of
34)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
19 of
49)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
51%
(
27 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniela Vismane
Player
Maria Toma
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve %
41%
(
21 of
51)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
43%
(
30 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Daniela Vismane
Player
Amarissa Kiara Toth
0%
(
0 of
0)
1st Serve %
50%
(
3 of
6)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
0%
(
0 of
0)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
0%
(
0 of
0)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
2
Total Points Won
4
|
0-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Daniela Vismane
Player
Alice Rame
83%
(
50 of
60)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
50%
(
25 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
47%
(
28 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
65
Total Points Won
66
|
2-6 6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Oz Vs Vismane Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
