Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Illya Marchenko vs Jeremy Chardy Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Marchenko vs Chardy analysis and find out who is favored!
Illya Marchenko vs Jeremy Chardy Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Marchenko has won 50% of points on his second serve, while Chardy has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Marchenko, in recent form, has won 46.78% of his opponent's second serve points, while Chardy has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.56% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Marchenko has saved 64.78% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Chardy has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Marchenko has won 58.33% of matches played (W/L 35/ 25), with Chardy winning 0% (W/L 0/ 4) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Marchenko has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 231/ 136), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 63/ 84). Chardy has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 210/ 162), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 51% (W/L 152/ 146).
- Player level: In the last year, Marchenko has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 62.5% of matches (W/L 30/ 18), where as Chardy has played most of their matches on the Masters series, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 2). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Marchenko winning 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Marchenko winning 2 and Chardy winning 2. The last match between Marchenko and Chardy was at the Qatar ExxonMobil Open - Doha, 07-01-2016, Quarterfinals, Hard with Illya Marchenko getting the victory 1100036746.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:47:27.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Marchenko and Chardy have played a deciding set 0 times, with Marchenko winning 0 times and Chardy 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Marchenko winning 1, and Chardy 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Marchenko has played against opponents with an average rank of 304.92 while Chardy has played against players with an average rank of 45.25.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Marchenko has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Chardy has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Marchenko has converted 41.56% of breakpoint opportunities, and Chardy has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Marchenko 1 - 1 Chardy
239
Rank
49
High
36
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
770
Rank
25
High
37
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
Form
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
57% (598-443)
Career Total W/L
54% (494-426)
31% (4-9)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$1,217,273
Career Prize Money
$5,487,593
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Illya Marchenko | Jeremy Chardy |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
| Games Won | 17 | 21 |
| Aces (Total) | 10 | 17 |
| DFs (Total) | 10 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:47:27 | 0:47:27 |
| 1st Serve % | 47% (60/128) | 72% (76/105) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 75% (45/60) | 75% (57/76) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 43% (29/68) | 41% (12/29) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 37% (7/19) |
| Return Points W% | 34% (36/105) | 42% (54/128) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-6(3) |
Stats 
Illya Marchenko
Player
Jeremy Chardy
54%
(
36 of
67)
1st Serve %
73%
(
45 of
62)
4
Aces
12
0
Double Faults
4
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
22 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
| 6-1 6-3 |
Stats
Jeremy Chardy
Player
Illya Marchenko
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve %
39%
(
24 of
61)
5
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
10
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
19 of
24)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
10 of
37)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Illya Marchenko | Jeremy Chardy |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 31% (4/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 35% (11/20) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (151/166) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 29% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.42 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 65 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.3 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 46 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 248.92 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (606/1081) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (411/606) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (234/475) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 39% (33/84) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (366/1008) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (3/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 31% (4/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 30% (3/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (5/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (5/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (8/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Illya Marchenko Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Seong Chan Hong
Player
Illya Marchenko
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
45%
(
30 of
67)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James Duckworth
Player
Illya Marchenko
47%
(
48 of
102)
1st Serve %
56%
(
62 of
111)
8
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
7
81%
(
39 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
43 of
62)
46%
(
25 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
46 of
111)
110
Total Points Won
103
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Rio Noguchi
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
73%
(
19 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Alex Bolt
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
34%
(
10 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ergi Kirkin
Player
Illya Marchenko
64%
(
60 of
94)
1st Serve %
64%
(
55 of
86)
10
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
2
78%
(
47 of
60)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
41 of
55)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
32 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
86)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Illya Marchenko
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
59%
(
53 of
90)
10
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(6) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Yannik Steinegger
64%
(
54 of
84)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
8
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
29 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
77)
87
Total Points Won
74
|
6-2 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Illya Marchenko
43%
(
25 of
58)
1st Serve %
39%
(
24 of
62)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Illya Marchenko
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
65 of
103)
16
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
88%
(
42 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
45 of
65)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
14 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Brandon Holt
49%
(
55 of
112)
1st Serve %
70%
(
89 of
127)
9
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
1
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
57 of
89)
51%
(
29 of
57)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
37%
(
41 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
52 of
127)
123
Total Points Won
116
|
7-6(3) 6-7(4) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
view more
Jeremy Chardy Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Jeremy Chardy
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
61 of
94)
10
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
10
84%
(
38 of
45)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
25%
(
18 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
49 of
94)
104
Total Points Won
63
|
6-0 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Jeremy Chardy
55%
(
33 of
60)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
64)
7
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
25 of
31)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
16 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Sonego
Player
Jeremy Chardy
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hugo Gaston
Player
Jeremy Chardy
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Jeremy Chardy
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve %
76%
(
62 of
82)
8
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
5
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
18 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
89
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jeremy Chardy
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
61%
(
96 of
157)
1st Serve %
60%
(
73 of
122)
7
Aces
2
14
Double Faults
4
68%
(
65 of
96)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
45 of
73)
43%
(
26 of
61)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
19%
(
5 of
26)
42%
(
66 of
157)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
55 of
122)
146
Total Points Won
133
|
1-6 7-5 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Berrettini
Player
Jeremy Chardy
67%
(
67 of
100)
1st Serve %
64%
(
77 of
120)
17
Aces
12
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
54 of
67)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
55 of
77)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
23%
(
23 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
41 of
120)
118
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(5) 7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Jeremy Chardy
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
6
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
6
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexander Zverev
Player
Jeremy Chardy
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
11
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
89%
(
8 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
5 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Jeremy Chardy
Player
Liam Broady
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
70%
(
76 of
108)
11
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
2
82%
(
40 of
49)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
46 of
76)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
27%
(
21 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
106)
105
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(3) 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Marchenko Vs Chardy Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
