Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Illya Beloborodko vs Pawel Cias Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Beloborodko vs Cias analysis and find out who is favored!
Illya Beloborodko vs Pawel Cias Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Beloborodko has won 49.79% of points on his second serve, while Cias has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Beloborodko, in recent form, has won 53.05% of his opponent's second serve points, while Cias has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Beloborodko has saved 60.61% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cias has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Beloborodko has won 48.72% of matches played (W/L 19/ 20), with Cias winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Beloborodko has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 44/ 31), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 9/ 9). Cias has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Beloborodko has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 48.72% of matches (W/L 19/ 20), where as Cias has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Beloborodko has played against opponents with an average rank of 95.1 while Cias has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Beloborodko has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cias has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Beloborodko has converted 44.17% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cias has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Beloborodko 0 - 0 Cias
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
Age
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Beloborodko VS Cias H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Illya Beloborodko | Pawel Cias |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 61% (11/7) | 1st Match |
| Sets Win/Loss | 61% (25/16) | 1st Match |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (210/168) | 1st Match |
| Hard Win/Loss | 61% (11/7) | 1st Match |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Aces pg | 0.34 | 1st Match |
| Aces Total | 64 | 1st Match |
| DFs per game | 0.29 | 1st Match |
| DFs Total | 54 | 1st Match |
| Avg Match Time | 1:15:53 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 109.72 | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (524/857) | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (376/524) | 1st Match |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (175/333) | 1st Match |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (35/82) | 1st Match |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (342/890) | 1st Match |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Futures W/L | 61% (11/7) | 1st Match |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 59% (10/17) | 1st Match |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 1st Match |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (2/6) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, W | 77% (13/10) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, L | 23% (13/3) | 1st Match |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (5/1) | 1st Match |
Illya Beloborodko Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats 
Nicolas Ifi
Player
Illya Beloborodko
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
6
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Robin Bertrand
Player
Illya Beloborodko
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve %
56%
(
51 of
91)
2
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
6
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
23 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
87
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Illya Beloborodko
Player
Mohamed Safwat
57%
(
51 of
89)
1st Serve %
57%
(
60 of
106)
7
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
6
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
41 of
60)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
36%
(
32 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
106)
99
Total Points Won
96
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Illya Beloborodko
Player
Jakub Paul
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
5
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
0
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Illya Beloborodko
Player
Ludovico Vaccari
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve %
45%
(
25 of
56)
5
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 3-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Vadym Ursu
Player
Illya Beloborodko
68%
(
61 of
90)
1st Serve %
70%
(
62 of
89)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
42 of
62)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
32 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
89)
91
Total Points Won
88
|
2-6 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Illya Beloborodko
Player
Maxim Mrva
58%
(
57 of
98)
1st Serve %
47%
(
47 of
100)
4
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
12
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
37 of
47)
59%
(
24 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
38 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
100)
101
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Illya Beloborodko
Player
Milosz Sroka
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Pawel Cias Recent Matches Played
Before:
No Past Matches Available
Beloborodko Vs Cias Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
