Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ikumi Yamazaki vs Pichapak Sirikul Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Yamazaki vs Sirikul analysis and find out who is favored!
Ikumi Yamazaki vs Pichapak Sirikul Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Yamazaki has won 45.98% of points on his second serve, while Sirikul has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Yamazaki, in recent form, has won 55.92% of his opponent's second serve points, while Sirikul has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 45.22% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Yamazaki has saved 54.76% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sirikul has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Yamazaki has won 52.94% of matches played (W/L 18/ 16), with Sirikul winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Yamazaki has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 100% (W/L 7/ 0), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 4/ 4). Sirikul has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 5), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Yamazaki has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.25% of matches (W/L 18/ 14), where as Sirikul has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Yamazaki winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Yamazaki winning 2 and Sirikul winning 0. The last match between Yamazaki and Sirikul was at the W15 Hua Hin, 14-10-2019, Q1 round, Hard with Ikumi Yamazaki getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:47:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Yamazaki and Sirikul have played a deciding set 0 times, with Yamazaki winning 0 times and Sirikul 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Yamazaki winning 0, and Sirikul 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Yamazaki has played against opponents with an average rank of 92.44 while Sirikul has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Yamazaki has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sirikul has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Yamazaki has converted 54.84% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sirikul has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Yamazaki 1 - 0 Sirikul
828
Rank
421
High
22
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
31
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
L
L
L
L
61% (72-46)
Career Total W/L
0% (0-5)
67% (12-6)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Ikumi Yamazaki | Pichapak Sirikul |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 1 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:47:0 | 0:47:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (22/35) | 41% (15/37) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 77% (17/22) | 33% (5/15) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 92% (12/13) | 36% (8/22) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 63% (5/8) | 0% (0/1) |
| Return Points W% | 65% (24/37) | 17% (6/35) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-0 |
Stats 
Ikumi Yamazaki
Player
Pichapak Sirikul
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve %
41%
(
15 of
37)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
92%
(
12 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
17%
(
6 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
53
Total Points Won
19
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ikumi Yamazaki | Pichapak Sirikul |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 67% (12/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 64% (25/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (196/145) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 57% (4/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 73% (8/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.05 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 8 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.23 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 38 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:19:30 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 64 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 72% (703/975) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 59% (415/703) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (126/272) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 55% (75/136) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 50% (473/954) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 71% (12/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (12/18) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 92% (12/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 8% (12/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 17% (6/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Ikumi Yamazaki Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Sofia Rocchetti
Player
Ikumi Yamazaki
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
75%
(
33 of
44)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ikumi Yamazaki
Player
Valentini Grammatikopoulou
80%
(
70 of
88)
1st Serve %
75%
(
55 of
73)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
37 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
73)
87
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ikumi Yamazaki
Player
Giorgia Pinto
83%
(
40 of
48)
1st Serve %
72%
(
36 of
50)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
6
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
88%
(
7 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ilinca Dalina Amariei
Player
Ikumi Yamazaki
65%
(
50 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
47%
(
36 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
41 of
69)
82
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ikumi Yamazaki
Player
Gloria Ceschi
76%
(
50 of
66)
1st Serve %
74%
(
37 of
50)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ikumi Yamazaki
Player
Ingrid Vojcinakova
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve %
36%
(
20 of
56)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
10
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
10 of
36)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
46%
(
26 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Destanee Aiava
Player
Ikumi Yamazaki
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
76%
(
47 of
62)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ikumi Yamazaki
Player
Natsumi Kawaguchi
69%
(
62 of
90)
1st Serve %
72%
(
55 of
76)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
39 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
84
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ikumi Yamazaki
Player
Dayeon Back
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Pichapak Sirikul Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Eri Hozumi
Player
Pichapak Sirikul
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve %
43%
(
13 of
30)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
88%
(
15 of
17)
1st Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
90%
(
9 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
3 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
83%
(
25 of
30)
49
Total Points Won
8
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ikumi Yamazaki
Player
Pichapak Sirikul
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve %
41%
(
15 of
37)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
92%
(
12 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
17%
(
6 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
53
Total Points Won
19
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yu-Ting Hsieh
Player
Pichapak Sirikul
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
57%
(
24 of
42)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
2 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
26
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Robu Kajitani
Player
Pichapak Sirikul
45%
(
13 of
29)
1st Serve %
55%
(
17 of
31)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
100%
(
13 of
13)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
7%
(
1 of
14)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
81%
(
25 of
31)
49
Total Points Won
11
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Yamazaki Vs Sirikul Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
