Ignasi De Rueda De Genover vs Lamine Ouahab Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Genover vs Ouahab analysis and find out who is favored!
Ignasi De Rueda De Genover vs Lamine Ouahab Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Genover has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Ouahab has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Genover, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ouahab has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Genover has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ouahab has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Genover has won 55.56% of matches played (W/L 10/ 8), with Ouahab winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Genover has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 49% (W/L 37/ 39), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Ouahab has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 69% (W/L 484/ 216), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 19% (W/L 3/ 13).
- Player level: In the last year, Genover has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 55.56% of matches (W/L 10/ 8), where as Ouahab has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Genover winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Genover winning 2 and Ouahab winning 1. The last match between Genover and Ouahab was at the M15 Girona, 18-10-2021, Q2 round, Clay with Ignasi De Rueda De Genover getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Genover and Ouahab have played a deciding set 1 times, with Genover winning 1 times and Ouahab 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Genover winning 0, and Ouahab 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Genover has played against opponents with an average rank of 110.72 while Ouahab has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Genover has won 20% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ouahab has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Genover has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ouahab has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Genover 1 - 0 Ouahab
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
895
Rank
114
High
39
Age
R
Plays
34
Total
0
Mast
2
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
31
Minor
Form
46% (86-100)
Career Total W/L
67% (560-279)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$47,000
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Ignasi De Rueda De Genover | Lamine Ouahab |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 22 | 9 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-7(8) 6-0 10-2 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Ignasi De Rueda De Genover | Lamine Ouahab |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Ignasi De Rueda De Genover Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | 6-3 1-6 10-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Franco Emanuel Egea
Player
Ignasi De Rueda De Genover
61%
(
57 of
94)
1st Serve %
65%
(
56 of
86)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
41%
(
39 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
86)
96
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Ignasi De Rueda De Genover
Player
David Totikashvili
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Michael Geerts
Player
Ignasi De Rueda De Genover
46%
(
27 of
59)
1st Serve %
46%
(
25 of
54)
4
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-1 3-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 7-6(1) | H2H | |||
QF |
Alex Martinez
Player
Ignasi De Rueda De Genover
66%
(
65 of
99)
1st Serve %
69%
(
61 of
88)
-
Aces
-
9
Double Faults
4
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
47%
(
47 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
88)
97
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 5-7 11-9 | H2H |
view more
Lamine Ouahab Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | 6-2 2-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 1-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
QF |
Mario Mansilla Diez
Player
Lamine Ouahab
83%
(
40 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
20 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
53
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 0-6 10-8 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
R1 |
John Echeverria
Player
Lamine Ouahab
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Lamine Ouahab
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve %
70%
(
23 of
33)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
82%
(
14 of
17)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
9 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
35
Total Points Won
25
|
6-3 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
Lamine Ouahab
Player
Mikel Martinez
63%
(
71 of
113)
1st Serve %
59%
(
79 of
133)
4
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
1
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
52 of
79)
55%
(
23 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
40 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
54 of
133)
127
Total Points Won
119
|
6-3 6-7(4) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Lamine Ouahab
Player
Dali Blanch
51%
(
39 of
76)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
99)
1
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
48 of
64)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
38 of
99)
86
Total Points Won
89
|
2-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Damir Dzumhur
Player
Lamine Ouahab
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
49%
(
33 of
68)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Adam Moundir
Player
Lamine Ouahab
67%
(
72 of
108)
1st Serve %
63%
(
60 of
96)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
39%
(
42 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
96)
106
Total Points Won
98
|
5-7 6-2 7-6(2) | H2H |
view more