search

Ignacio Buse vs Leopold Zima Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com

By Wojtek Kolan

At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Buse vs Zima analysis and find out who is favored!

Our tennis head to head predictions work!
Sign up now!

Up to 78% win accuracy on past h2h matches

Want To Bet On This Match?

After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:

* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here

If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com  Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.

Ignacio Buse vs Leopold Zima Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Buse 1 - 0 Zima

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Buse has won 47.18% of points on their second serve, while Zima has won 40.49%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Buse, in recent form, has won 55.38% of their opponent's second serve points, while Zima has won 42.43%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.22% and 28.28% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Buse has saved 58.24% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zima has saved 49.49% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Buse has won 67.07% of matches played (W/L 55/ 27), with Zima winning 50.98% (W/L 26/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Buse has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 14/ 8), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 69/ 45). Zima has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 53/ 33), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 62/ 61).
  • Player level: In the last year, Buse has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.47% of matches (W/L 26/ 17), where as Zima has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 53.06% of matches (W/L 26/ 23). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Buse winning 1 times and Zima being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Buse winning 2 and Zima winning 0. The last match between Buse and Zima was at the Mauthausen Challenger, 05-05-2024, Q1 round, Clay with Ignacio Buse getting the victory 6-1 6-1.
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:45:32.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Buse and Zima have played a deciding set 0 times, with Buse winning 0 times and Zima 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Buse winning 0, and Zima 0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Buse has played against opponents with an average rank of 230.7 while Zima has played against players with an average rank of 116.12.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Buse has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zima has won 63% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Buse has converted 48.62% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zima has converted 38.81% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
  • If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
bet365
Ignacio Buse

3

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

3

Minor

271

Rank

271

High

20

Age

Plays

1

Total

0

0

Hard

0

1

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

895

Rank

774

High

24

Age

R

Plays

Leopold Zima

0

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

0

Minor

1

Total

0

0

Hard

0

1

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

L W W W L W W W L L

Form

L W W W L L L W L L

61% (83-53)

Career Total W/L

55% (159-129)

65% (33-18)

YTD W/L

58% (19-14)

$0

Career Prize Money

$0

1

YTD Titles

0

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

banner

The Best Odds For Ignacio Buse vs Leopold Zima For Any Market:

We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:

Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Buse VS Zima

Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!

Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting

Buse VS Zima H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

stats Ignacio Buse Leopold Zima
All H2H Matches 1 0
Sets Won 2 0
Games Won 12 2
Aces (Total) 1 0
DFs Total 1 4
Avg Match Time 0:45:32 0:45:32
1st Serve % 76% (28/37) 46% (19/41)
1st Serve Win% 75% (21/28) 58% (11/19)
2nd Serve Win% 78% (7/9) 32% (7/22)
BPs Won% (Total) 63% (5/8) 0% (0/0)
Return Points W% 56% (23/41) 24% (9/37)
Best of 3 Sets W% 100% (1/1) 0% (0/1)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, W 100% (1/1) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, L 0% (1/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set L, W 0% (0/0) 0% (1/0)

Buse VS Zima H2h Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
6-1 6-1
cross
Ignacio Buse
Player
Leopold Zima
76% ( 28 of 37)
1st Serve %
46% ( 19 of 41)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
75% ( 21 of 28)
1st Serve Won
58% ( 11 of 19)
78% ( 7 of 9)
2nd Serve Won
32% ( 7 of 22)
63% ( 5 of 8)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
24% ( 9 of 37)
Rtn Points Won
56% ( 23 of 41)
51
Total Points Won
27

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

stats Ignacio Buse Leopold Zima
YTD W/L 65% (33/18) 58% (19/14)
Sets Win/Loss 62% (74/46) 53% (40/35)
Games Win/Loss 55% (596/481) 50% (362/356)
Hard Win/Loss 50% (3/3) 71% (5/2)
Clay Win/Loss 67% (30/15) 44% (7/9)
Indoor Hard W/L 0% (0/0) 70% (7/3)
Grass Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Aces pg 0.21 0.21
Aces Total 113 72
DFs per game 0.23 0.12
DFs Total 123 41
Avg Match Time 1:46:43 1st Match
Avg Opp Rank 286.2 121.21
1st Serve % 63% (2150/3407) 68% (746/1104)
1st Serve W% 66% (1427/2150) 68% (506/746)
2nd Serve W% 47% (593/1257) 41% (147/358)
BPs Won% Total 49% (212/436) 40% (31/78)
Return Pts W% 45% (1603/3532) 34% (350/1037)
Slam W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Masters W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Cups W/L 50% (1/1) 0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L 0% (0/2) 0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Challenger W/L 63% (15/9) 0% (0/1)
Futures W/L 74% (17/6) 59% (19/13)
Best of 3 Sets W% 64% (32/50) 58% (19/33)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 38% (5/13) 44% (4/9)
Deciding Set W% 53% (10/19) 78% (7/9)
1st set W, W 90% (31/28) 94% (17/16)
1st set W, L 10% (31/3) 6% (17/1)
1st set L, W 25% (20/5) 19% (16/3)

Ignacio Buse Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
Q1
cross
Vit Kopriva
Player
Ignacio Buse
69% ( 62 of 90)
1st Serve %
69% ( 61 of 89)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
65% ( 40 of 62)
1st Serve Won
61% ( 37 of 61)
68% ( 19 of 28)
2nd Serve Won
39% ( 11 of 28)
54% ( 7 of 13)
Break Points Won
14% ( 1 of 7)
34% ( 31 of 90)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 41 of 89)
100
Total Points Won
79
L
6-1 6-7(3) 6-1 H2H
SF
cross
Alexander Ritschard
Player
Ignacio Buse
41% ( 41 of 101)
1st Serve %
58% ( 53 of 91)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
68% ( 28 of 41)
1st Serve Won
64% ( 34 of 53)
58% ( 35 of 60)
2nd Serve Won
53% ( 20 of 38)
56% ( 5 of 9)
Break Points Won
57% ( 4 of 7)
38% ( 38 of 101)
Rtn Points Won
41% ( 37 of 91)
100
Total Points Won
92
L
5-7 6-2 7-6(2) H2H
QF
cross
Ignacio Buse
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
75% ( 78 of 104)
1st Serve %
61% ( 60 of 98)
3
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
4
71% ( 55 of 78)
1st Serve Won
67% ( 40 of 60)
46% ( 12 of 26)
2nd Serve Won
45% ( 17 of 38)
63% ( 5 of 8)
Break Points Won
27% ( 3 of 11)
36% ( 37 of 104)
Rtn Points Won
42% ( 41 of 98)
108
Total Points Won
94
W
6-7(5) 6-3 6-4 H2H
R2
cross
Ignacio Buse
Player
Vit Kopriva
55% ( 49 of 89)
1st Serve %
64% ( 87 of 137)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
11
63% ( 31 of 49)
1st Serve Won
61% ( 53 of 87)
50% ( 20 of 40)
2nd Serve Won
34% ( 17 of 50)
29% ( 6 of 21)
Break Points Won
44% ( 4 of 9)
43% ( 38 of 89)
Rtn Points Won
49% ( 67 of 137)
118
Total Points Won
108
W
4-6 6-2 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Ignacio Buse
Player
Gerard Campana Lee
57% ( 29 of 51)
1st Serve %
46% ( 32 of 69)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
69% ( 20 of 29)
1st Serve Won
53% ( 17 of 32)
45% ( 10 of 22)
2nd Serve Won
43% ( 16 of 37)
55% ( 6 of 11)
Break Points Won
50% ( 3 of 6)
41% ( 21 of 51)
Rtn Points Won
52% ( 36 of 69)
66
Total Points Won
54
W
6-4 6-2 H2H
SF
cross
Miguel Damas
Player
Ignacio Buse
87% ( 52 of 60)
1st Serve %
61% ( 39 of 64)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
63% ( 33 of 52)
1st Serve Won
69% ( 27 of 39)
50% ( 4 of 8)
2nd Serve Won
24% ( 6 of 25)
50% ( 4 of 8)
Break Points Won
67% ( 2 of 3)
38% ( 23 of 60)
Rtn Points Won
48% ( 31 of 64)
68
Total Points Won
56
L
6-3 6-4 H2H
QF
cross
Ignacio Buse
Player
John Echeverria
57% ( 27 of 47)
1st Serve %
55% ( 32 of 58)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
59% ( 16 of 27)
1st Serve Won
47% ( 15 of 32)
70% ( 14 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 10 of 26)
60% ( 6 of 10)
Break Points Won
67% ( 2 of 3)
36% ( 17 of 47)
Rtn Points Won
57% ( 33 of 58)
63
Total Points Won
42
W
6-1 6-4 H2H
R2
cross
Ignacio Buse
Player
Iliyan Radulov
69% ( 40 of 58)
1st Serve %
63% ( 39 of 62)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
73% ( 29 of 40)
1st Serve Won
67% ( 26 of 39)
56% ( 10 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
22% ( 5 of 23)
40% ( 4 of 10)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 2)
33% ( 19 of 58)
Rtn Points Won
50% ( 31 of 62)
70
Total Points Won
50
W
6-1 6-3 H2H
R1
cross
Ignacio Buse
Player
Pablo Masjuan Ginel
55% ( 59 of 107)
1st Serve %
73% ( 65 of 89)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
68% ( 40 of 59)
1st Serve Won
60% ( 39 of 65)
44% ( 21 of 48)
2nd Serve Won
42% ( 10 of 24)
42% ( 5 of 12)
Break Points Won
25% ( 4 of 16)
43% ( 46 of 107)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 40 of 89)
101
Total Points Won
95
W
6-4 2-6 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Enrico Dalla Valle
Player
Ignacio Buse
67% ( 56 of 83)
1st Serve %
59% ( 64 of 109)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
68% ( 38 of 56)
1st Serve Won
55% ( 35 of 64)
41% ( 11 of 27)
2nd Serve Won
51% ( 23 of 45)
42% ( 5 of 12)
Break Points Won
50% ( 4 of 8)
41% ( 34 of 83)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 51 of 109)
100
Total Points Won
92
L
6-4 1-6 6-2 H2H

Leopold Zima Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
R1
cross
Gauthier Onclin
Player
Leopold Zima
57% ( 30 of 53)
1st Serve %
62% ( 29 of 47)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
73% ( 22 of 30)
1st Serve Won
55% ( 16 of 29)
70% ( 16 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
33% ( 6 of 18)
80% ( 4 of 5)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 3)
28% ( 15 of 53)
Rtn Points Won
53% ( 25 of 47)
63
Total Points Won
37
L
6-1 6-3 H2H
QF
L
7-5 4-0 ret. H2H
Q1
W
6-4 6-1 H2H
R1
cross
Daniel Michalski
Player
Leopold Zima
75% ( 45 of 60)
1st Serve %
76% ( 54 of 71)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
64% ( 29 of 45)
1st Serve Won
56% ( 30 of 54)
60% ( 9 of 15)
2nd Serve Won
29% ( 5 of 17)
56% ( 5 of 9)
Break Points Won
75% ( 3 of 4)
37% ( 22 of 60)
Rtn Points Won
51% ( 36 of 71)
74
Total Points Won
57
L
6-1 7-6(4) H2H
R1
cross
Filippo Romano
Player
Leopold Zima
59% ( 16 of 27)
1st Serve %
72% ( 23 of 32)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
75% ( 12 of 16)
1st Serve Won
43% ( 10 of 23)
73% ( 8 of 11)
2nd Serve Won
22% ( 2 of 9)
44% ( 4 of 9)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 3)
26% ( 7 of 27)
Rtn Points Won
63% ( 20 of 32)
40
Total Points Won
19
L
6-0 2-0 ret. H2H
R2
cross
Tom Gentzsch
Player
Leopold Zima
69% ( 37 of 54)
1st Serve %
68% ( 46 of 68)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
68% ( 25 of 37)
1st Serve Won
61% ( 28 of 46)
59% ( 10 of 17)
2nd Serve Won
41% ( 9 of 22)
40% ( 4 of 10)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
35% ( 19 of 54)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 31 of 68)
66
Total Points Won
56
L
6-4 6-3 H2H
R1
cross
Leopold Zima
Player
Milos Karol
63% ( 47 of 75)
1st Serve %
61% ( 48 of 79)
3
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
6
70% ( 33 of 47)
1st Serve Won
71% ( 34 of 48)
50% ( 14 of 28)
2nd Serve Won
58% ( 18 of 31)
38% ( 3 of 8)
Break Points Won
40% ( 2 of 5)
37% ( 28 of 75)
Rtn Points Won
34% ( 27 of 79)
74
Total Points Won
80
W
1-6 6-3 6-3 H2H
QF
W
3-6 6-3 10-8 H2H
Q1
W
6-2 6-4 H2H
Q1
cross
Ignacio Buse
Player
Leopold Zima
76% ( 28 of 37)
1st Serve %
46% ( 19 of 41)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
75% ( 21 of 28)
1st Serve Won
58% ( 11 of 19)
78% ( 7 of 9)
2nd Serve Won
32% ( 7 of 22)
63% ( 5 of 8)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
24% ( 9 of 37)
Rtn Points Won
56% ( 23 of 41)
51
Total Points Won
27
L
6-1 6-1 H2H

Buse Vs Zima Prediction H2H Images To Share

More tennis photos of Buse are available here and Zima photos here.


Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions

Unlock All Predictions