S. Ofner
To Win
K. Coppejans
To Win
Hynek Barton vs Kimmer Coppejans Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L L W W W W L
Form
W L W L W W L W W LHead-to-head: Barton 0 - 1 Coppejans
They have played 2 sets in total, with Barton winning 0 and Coppejans winning 2. The last match between Barton and Coppejans was at the Pune Challenger, 16-02-2025, Q1 round, Hard with Kimmer Coppejans getting the victory 6-3 7-6(5).
Pune Challenger(16-02-2025)
6
3
7
6
Upcoming Match
18 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Gracheva VS Parks PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
18 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Rakhimova VS Blinkova PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
18 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-6(5) |
Stats 
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Hynek Barton
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
52%
(
35 of
67)
1
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
4
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
27 of
35)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
65
Total Points Won
60
|
||||
Stats
0
H2H Matches
1
0
Sets Won
2
9
Games Won
13
7
Aces (Total)
1
4
Total Double Faults
3
1:19:14
Average Match Time
1:19:14
52% (35/67)
1st Serve %
60% (35/58)
77% (27/35)
1st Serve Win %
77% (27/35)
41% (13/32)
2nd Serve Win %
48% (11/23)
50% (2/4)
Break Points Won % (Total)
67% (4/6)
34% (20/58)
Return Points Win %
40% (27/67)
0% (0/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Won Match
100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (1/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (0/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Hynek Barton vs Kimmer Coppejans Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Hynek Barton 0 - 1 Kimmer Coppejans
Predictions Theme: Insights on the Upcoming Tennis Match
Second serve performance in recent form: Over the past six months, Barton has exhibited a commendable proficiency on their second serve, winning an impressive 54.05% of points, while Coppejans has achieved a slightly lower success rate of 50.29%. It is worth noting that this statistical pattern holds a significant correlation with the accuracy of match predictions.
Return game statistics in recent form: Delving into return game stats, in recent times Barton has proven adept at capitalizing on their opponents' vulnerability during second serve moments, clinching 50% of the corresponding points. Conversely, Coppejans has displayed a higher prowess in this area, having won 54.21% of such points. First serve returns have also been analyzed, with Barton achieving a success rate of 33.76% and Coppejans an even more impressive rate of 37.9%. These numbers substantially contribute to determining the favored player in their upcoming head-to-head encounter.
Under pressure analysis: Under the demanding conditions of high-stakes matches, Barton has showcased their resilience by successfully saving 65.37% of breakpoints during their recent performance. In contrast, Coppejans has managed to salvage 57.98% of such critical moments. This statistical insight proves invaluable when making in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Examining their overall performance over the past year, Barton has attained victories in 63.08% of their matches (winning 41 out of 65 encounters), while Coppejans has impressed with a remarkable win rate of 78.26% (emerging triumphant in 36 out of 46 matches). This overview offers valuable insights into their head-to-head prediction.
Preferred playing surface: For Barton, the hard court surface has witnessed the pinnacle of their career, with a solid 70% success rate (winning 30 out of 43 matches). On the contrary, their performance on indoor hard courts has been comparatively weaker, garnering only a 44% win rate (7 victories out of 16 matches). Coppejans, however, boasts a prominent 62% career win rate on hard courts (emerging victorious in 136 out of 221 matches), while suffering on grass courts with a mere 25% success rate (3 wins out of 12 matches).
Player level: Barton's recent participation mostly involves Challenger and ITF tournaments with a prize pool exceeding $10,000, accumulating a 63.04% win rate (winning 29 out of 46 matches). In contrast, Coppejans has primarily competed in Futures, Satellites, and ITF tournaments with a prize pool of $10,000, achieving an astonishing success rate of 95.45% (emerging victorious in 21 out of 22 matches). When assessing player statistics to predict the favorite, it is crucial to consider the relative significance of the events at which they have been performing.
Opponent quality statistics: Throughout the previous year, Barton has been pitted against opponents with an average rank of 378.92, while Coppejans has faced players with an average rank of 366.2, indicating their varying levels of competition.
Deciding set performance against all players: For those keen on live predictions and betting, should this match venture into a determining set, Barton's proficiency in such situations becomes apparent, having secured victory in 58% of decisive sets throughout the past year. In contrast, Coppejans boasts an impressive win rate of 67% in all matches played on tour.
Current event head-to-head statistics: While past player performance indeed holds value when predicting tennis matches, it becomes equally crucial to analyze current event statistics for players in good form. For this purpose, we recommend referring to the section below (provided that the players have participated in matches within the ongoing event). Additionally, certain players may excel in specific events, and it is imperative to consider this factor when forecasting the match outcome.
Break point conversion efficiency: In recent play, Barton has capitalized on 43.7% of their breakpoint opportunities, whereas Coppejans has displayed an even higher level of effectiveness by converting 49.2% of their chances to break their opponents' serve. This noteworthy statistic provides valuable insights for in-game live betting tips whenever either player finds themselves with a breakpoint opportunity.
If you are curious about advanced models for predicting tennis matches, we suggest delving into this compendium. (Warning: For statisticians and enthusiasts only)
Hynek Barton Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Hynek Barton
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
48%
(
36 of
75)
5
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
19 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
75)
76
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hynek Barton
Player
August Holmgren
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
73)
8
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
6
90%
(
35 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
24%
(
16 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
25 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hynek Barton
Player
Vit Kopriva
52%
(
50 of
96)
1st Serve %
59%
(
45 of
76)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
38 of
45)
54%
(
25 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
32 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
23 of
76)
87
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hynek Barton
Player
Mukund Sasikumar
63%
(
50 of
80)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
13
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
33 of
42)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
24 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
20 of
70)
76
Total Points Won
74
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hynek Barton
Player
Sidharth Rawat
44%
(
27 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
39 of
70)
9
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Hynek Barton
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
52%
(
35 of
67)
1
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
4
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
27 of
35)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
65
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Hynek Barton
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve %
54%
(
60 of
112)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
49 of
112)
94
Total Points Won
87
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hynek Barton
Player
Rio Noguchi
71%
(
70 of
99)
1st Serve %
66%
(
50 of
76)
9
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
37 of
50)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
34%
(
34 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
22 of
76)
87
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hynek Barton
Player
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
72)
14
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hynek Barton
Player
Egor Gerasimov
48%
(
23 of
48)
1st Serve %
50%
(
35 of
70)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
12 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Kimmer Coppejans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
George Loffhagen
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
52%
(
35 of
67)
1st Serve %
64%
(
57 of
89)
3
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
6
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
49%
(
33 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
89)
75
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 7-5 11-9 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Finn Bass
63%
(
48 of
76)
1st Serve %
63%
(
60 of
95)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
48%
(
23 of
48)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
50%
(
9 of
18)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
54%
(
41 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
54 of
95)
89
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Daniel Domingos
51%
(
26 of
51)
1st Serve %
55%
(
35 of
64)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hiroki Moriya
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
59%
(
66 of
112)
1st Serve %
53%
(
53 of
100)
4
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
7
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
43%
(
48 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
100)
110
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Ramkumar Ramanathan
48%
(
42 of
87)
1st Serve %
62%
(
63 of
101)
16
Aces
11
8
Double Faults
7
86%
(
36 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
51%
(
23 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
28 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
101)
103
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Hynek Barton
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
52%
(
35 of
67)
1
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
4
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
27 of
35)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
65
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jiri Vesely
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
60%
(
57 of
95)
1st Serve %
57%
(
44 of
77)
14
Aces
9
9
Double Faults
6
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
35 of
44)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
38%
(
36 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
28 of
77)
87
Total Points Won
85
|
2-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Parth Aggarwal
49%
(
21 of
43)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
37%
(
16 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rio Noguchi
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve %
45%
(
23 of
51)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
24 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Siddharth Vishwakarma
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
9
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
11 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
63% (103/60)
Win/Loss
58% (459/326)
61% (218/141)
Sets Win/Loss
56% (1042/828)
54% (1830/1585)
Games Win/Loss
53% (9201/8306)
69% (34/15)
Hard Win/Loss
62% (140/87)
63% (59/34)
Clay Win/Loss
61% (299/194)
48% (10/11)
Indoor Hard W/L
32% (17/36)
0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss
25% (3/9)
0.49
Aces Per Game
0.25
828
Aces Total
2100
0.21
Double Faults Per Game
0.21
345
Total Double Faults
1773
1:28:4
Average Match Time
1:28:19
399.29
Average Opponent Rank
491.94
59% (5868/9980)
1st Serve %
65% (30757/47557)
71% (4151/5868)
1st Serve Win %
67% (20646/30757)
52% (2140/4112)
2nd Serve Win %
48% (8126/16800)
43% (446/1047)
Break Points Won % (Total)
43% (2295/5286)
40% (4111/10243)
Return Points Win %
42% (20314/48572)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
52% (34/31)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
33% (3/6)
0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L
28% (11/29)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
59% (39/27)
Challenger W/L
57% (284/216)
66% (64/33)
Futures W/L
75% (127/43)
63% (101/160)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
59% (453/772)
0% (0/1)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
40% (4/10)
52% (23/44)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
56% (116/209)
62% (21/34)
Deciding Set Win %
57% (166/290)
90% (102/92)
1st Set Won, Won Match
84% (425/357)
10% (102/10)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
16% (425/67)
18% (61/11)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
28% (360/101)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
