L. Tu
To Win
S. Shimabukuro
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L L W W L W LForm
L W L W L W L W L WThey have played 6 sets in total, with Chung winning 3 and Tu winning 3. The last match between Chung and Tu was at the Busan Challenger, 17-04-2025, Round: Second, Surface: Hard, with Hyeon Chung getting the victory 3-6 6-3 6-4.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Hyeon Chung | 1 |
Li Tu | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Busan Challenger(17-04-2025)
Chung | Stats | Tu |
---|---|---|
70% (26-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 45% (14-17) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
377 | Ranking | 164 |
19 | Highest Rank | 164 |
29 | Age | 29 |
R | Plays | - |
17 | Titles | 10 |
65% (282-149) | Career Total W/L | 61% (203-129) |
$2,529,406 | Career Prize Money | $371,045 |
2 | YTD Titles | 0 |
1 | Hard H2H | 1 |
- / Q2 round
Rothesay International - Eastbourne atp
24 Jun 2025 / First
Rothesay International - Eastbourne atp
22 Jun 2025 / First
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3-6 6-3 6-4 |
![]() ![]()
Hyeon Chung
Player
Li Tu
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
62%
(
65 of
105)
4
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
3
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
43 of
65)
39%
(
14 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
14 of
40)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
40%
(
35 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
48 of
105)
100
Total Points Won
92
|
||||
4-6 6-3 6-1 |
![]() ![]()
Li Tu
Player
Hyeon Chung
70%
(
53 of
76)
1st Serve %
52%
(
50 of
96)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
11
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
24 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
96)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
3 | Sets Won | 3 |
25 | Games Won | 29 |
7 | Aces (Total) | 12 |
17 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
2:11:38 | Average Match Time | 2:11:38 |
55% (101/183) | 1st Serve % | 65% (118/181) |
72% (73/101) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (82/118) |
43% (35/82) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (27/63) |
50% (6/12) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 53% (8/15) |
40% (72/181) | Return Points Win % | 41% (75/183) |
50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Prepare yourselves as we dive into the thrilling world of second serves, where Chung has been busily securing 39.92% of points over the past six months, only to find that Tu is slightly more adept, boasting a 43.96% success rate. This stat is not just a series of numbers but the secret ingredient to predicting who will dance away with the victory. Beware, second serve aficionados, your radar is now finely tuned!
Now, let's venture into return games, where Chung seems to be playing catch with their opponent's second serve, grabbing 45.15% of those precious points. Meanwhile, Tu is right on their heels, snatching 44.93%. When it comes to first serve returns, Chung has been a tad more generous, winning 30.17%, leaving Tu to ponder over their 21.92%. These numbers are the tarot cards of this match, painting a picture of who's likely to emerge as the fan favorite.
Facing the pressure cooker of breakpoints, we find Chung displaying resilience with a 45.45% save rate, while Tu, perhaps under the cool shade of an imaginary umbrella, manages 54.67%. Such bravery (or luck) is a goldmine for bettors when the stakes are high. Speaking of high stakes, performance over the last year shows Chung basking in a 74.29% match-win glow, turning the tennis court into their personal stage. In contrast, Tu has been winning with a still commendable 56.52% win rate, serving us a fresh batch of head-to-head predictions.
Zooming out to the broader scope, both players prefer the cozy confines of a Hardcourt, where Chung stands at a 70% career win record, while Tu stays close with 65%. However, the duo seems a bit flustered on grass, with Chung setting a leisurely 20% win rate picnic, while Tu brings in 54%, perhaps with some prenup agreements with the grass blades. But beware, stats can fluctuate as wildly as a player's serve!
Diving into direct H2Hs, Chung and Tu have crossed rackets once before, and it was Tu who waltzed away with the win. They've also tangoed through three sets, a scenario where Tu holds the edge 2 sets to 1. Their previous encounter at the Seoul Challenger served up a mystical 4-6, 6-3, 6-1 tale in favor of Tu. So, if these two are dueling, you might want to pack a lunch, as previous bouts averaged a competitive 1 hour, 57 minutes, and 53 seconds.
For those eagerly awaiting decisive moments, Chung has been known to win a paltry 38% of deciding sets in the past year, while Tu's been indulging with a 50% success rate. Their lack of tiebreakers might concern a few, but currently, both have been graciously sharing a 0-0 record. When considering the quality of their adversaries, Chung faces an average rank of 251.63, while Tu's competitors hover around the 203.99 mark. Now, if you're tuning in live and the match dwindles to a nail-biting deciding set, put your stakes on Tu, who's exhibited an upper hand across the board.
Their breakpoint conversion isn't just a number, it's a narrative - never understated, always insightful. Chung has been capitalizing on 33.12% of break points, while Tu lags slightly with 31.58%. So sharp-minded bettors, armed with this arsenal of breakdowns, should expect Tu to claim the grand prize in this comical tale of tennis, based solely on the witty stats we've unraveled.
Chung vs Tu Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Nicolas Ian Kotzen
Player
Hyeon Chung
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve %
54%
(
51 of
94)
7
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
9
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
28 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
94)
97
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Hyeon Chung
Player
Bjorn Swenson
42%
(
22 of
52)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Paul Jubb
Player
Hyeon Chung
63%
(
57 of
90)
1st Serve %
54%
(
50 of
92)
4
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
11
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
30%
(
10 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
49%
(
44 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
45 of
92)
91
Total Points Won
91
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Hyeon Chung
Player
Pranav Kumar
53%
(
20 of
38)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
65%
(
13 of
20)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
13 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Hyeon Chung
Player
Dane Sweeny
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
7
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
78)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Andres Martin
Player
Hyeon Chung
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Kenta Miyoshi
Player
Hyeon Chung
65%
(
58 of
89)
1st Serve %
59%
(
59 of
100)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
41 of
59)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
30 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
100)
99
Total Points Won
90
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Hyeon Chung
Player
Keisuke Saitoh
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
68%
(
27 of
40)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Benjamin Bonzi
Player
Li Tu
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
6
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
4
83%
(
40 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
19 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
22 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Li Tu
Player
Ethan Quinn
55%
(
51 of
93)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
92)
11
Aces
14
6
Double Faults
5
86%
(
44 of
51)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
34%
(
32 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
92)
99
Total Points Won
86
|
5-7 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
Player
Li Tu
55%
(
47 of
86)
1st Serve %
62%
(
55 of
89)
12
Aces
7
12
Double Faults
4
85%
(
40 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
28 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
89)
95
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 6-7(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Li Tu
Player
Eliot Spizzirri
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
10
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Alex Bolt
Player
Li Tu
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
55%
(
37 of
67)
11
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Li Tu
Player
Eliot Spizzirri
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
9
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Zachary Svajda
Player
Li Tu
65%
(
74 of
113)
1st Serve %
47%
(
41 of
87)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
55 of
74)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
32 of
41)
41%
(
16 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
37%
(
42 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
29 of
87)
100
Total Points Won
100
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
65% (282/149) | Win/Loss | 61% (203/129) |
62% (645/391) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (450/309) |
55% (5200/4258) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (3837/3341) |
69% (228/104) | Hard Win/Loss | 64% (141/80) |
59% (30/21) | Clay Win/Loss | 56% (25/20) |
58% (22/16) | Indoor Hard W/L | 58% (18/13) |
20% (2/8) | Grass Win/Loss | 54% (19/16) |
0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.43 |
1208 | Aces Total | 1528 |
0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
1075 | Total Double Faults | 672 |
1:24:40 | Average Match Time | 1:20:15 |
523.25 | Average Opponent Rank | 363.98 |
62% (15422/24736) | 1st Serve % | 61% (11545/18882) |
70% (10847/15422) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (8390/11545) |
51% (4710/9314) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (3827/7337) |
45% (1251/2805) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (787/1853) |
42% (10713/25805) | Return Points Win % | 39% (7632/19410) |
58% (22/16) | Slam W/L | 41% (7/10) |
52% (17/16) | Masters W/L | 63% (5/3) |
83% (10/2) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
56% (59/47) | Main Tour W/L | 56% (15/12) |
68% (100/46) | Challenger W/L | 48% (63/68) |
77% (74/22) | Futures W/L | 76% (113/36) |
65% (251/385) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (203/328) |
68% (28/41) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/4) |
52% (67/128) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (56/106) |
58% (69/119) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (49/89) |
87% (280/243) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (195/174) |
13% (280/37) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (195/20) |
26% (151/39) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (137/29) |