Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Hyeon Chung vs Ji Sung Nam Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Chung vs Nam analysis and find out who is favored!
Hyeon Chung vs Ji Sung Nam Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chung has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Nam has won 46.28%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chung, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Nam has won 53.52%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 35.92% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Chung has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nam has saved 57.02% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Chung has won 14.29% of matches played (W/L 1/ 6), with Nam winning 45.16% (W/L 14/ 17) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Chung has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 69% (W/L 194/ 88), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 20% (W/L 2/ 8). Nam has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 229/ 168), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Chung has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 5), where as Nam has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 46.43% of matches (W/L 13/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Chung winning 4 times. They have played 10 sets in total, with Chung winning 8 and Nam winning 2. The last match between Chung and Nam was at the Chengdu Challenger, 02-08-2019, Quarterfinals, Hard with Hyeon Chung getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:6:50.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Chung and Nam have played a deciding set 2 times, with Chung winning 2 times and Nam 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Chung winning 2, and Nam 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chung has played against opponents with an average rank of 172.43 while Nam has played against players with an average rank of 315.42.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chung has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nam has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Chung has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nam has converted 37.72% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Chung 4 - 0 Nam
499
Rank
19
High
27
Age
R
Plays
4
Total0
4
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
708
Rank
236
High
30
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
Form
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
65% (243-132)
Career Total W/L
56% (276-213)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
33% (2-4)
$2,529,406
Career Prize Money
$1,445
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Hyeon Chung | Ji Sung Nam |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 4 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 8 | 2 |
| Games Won | 52 | 36 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 11 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:6:50 | 1:6:50 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (108/171) | 59% (112/190) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 76% (82/108) | 69% (77/112) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 49% (31/63) | 53% (41/78) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 29% (4/14) | 56% (5/9) |
| Return Points W% | 38% (72/190) | 34% (58/171) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (4/4) | 0% (0/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (4/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (4/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(2) 1-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Hyeon Chung
Player
Ji Sung Nam
65%
(
61 of
94)
1st Serve %
59%
(
58 of
99)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
48 of
61)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
31 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
34 of
99)
97
Total Points Won
96
|
||||
| 6-4 1-6 6-3 |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Ji Sung Nam
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
91)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
88
Total Points Won
80
|
||||
| 6-0 6-0 | |||||
| 6-2 7-6(4) | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Hyeon Chung | Ji Sung Nam |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (2/4) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 31% (4/9) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 43% (55/72) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.13 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 8 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.41 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 25 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:43:45 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 175.17 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 60% (233/390) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 67% (155/233) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 45% (70/157) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 33% (15/46) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 39% (171/441) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 33% (2/6) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (4/0) |
Hyeon Chung Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Hyeon Chung
65%
(
15 of
23)
1st Serve %
55%
(
17 of
31)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
73%
(
11 of
15)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
39%
(
9 of
23)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
36
Total Points Won
18
|
6-1 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Dimitar Kuzmanov
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
75%
(
61 of
81)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
37 of
61)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
20 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
82
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Hyeon Chung
50%
(
12 of
24)
1st Serve %
71%
(
15 of
21)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
58%
(
7 of
12)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
46%
(
11 of
24)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
26
Total Points Won
19
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nuno Borges
Player
Hyeon Chung
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andy Murray
Player
Hyeon Chung
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
8
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
92%
(
12 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
6 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Hyeon Chung
63%
(
57 of
91)
1st Serve %
56%
(
55 of
99)
7
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
7
79%
(
45 of
57)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
28 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
99)
103
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 6-7(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jordan Thompson
Player
Hyeon Chung
49%
(
26 of
53)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Renzo Olivo
Player
Hyeon Chung
65%
(
49 of
75)
1st Serve %
47%
(
36 of
77)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
11
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
12 of
41)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
48%
(
36 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
45 of
77)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Baptiste Crepatte
48%
(
34 of
71)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
84)
1
Aces
2
11
Double Faults
2
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
9 of
39)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
48%
(
34 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
46 of
84)
83
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jozef Kovalik
Player
Hyeon Chung
35%
(
24 of
69)
1st Serve %
38%
(
24 of
64)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
10
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
42%
(
19 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
46%
(
32 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Ji Sung Nam Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Alibek Kachmazov
Player
Ji Sung Nam
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
30 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Otto Virtanen
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
Ji Sung Nam
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Masamichi Imamura
Player
Ji Sung Nam
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
26 of
33)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
12%
(
2 of
17)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Takuya Kumasaka
56%
(
57 of
102)
1st Serve %
65%
(
79 of
122)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
51 of
79)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
42%
(
43 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
53 of
122)
112
Total Points Won
112
|
7-6(6) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Bolt
Player
Ji Sung Nam
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
80)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
14 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kaichi Uchida
Player
Ji Sung Nam
57%
(
76 of
134)
1st Serve %
57%
(
59 of
104)
1
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
4
63%
(
48 of
76)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
50%
(
29 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
43%
(
57 of
134)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
104)
121
Total Points Won
117
|
7-6(6) 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Calum Puttergill
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
8
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
86)
93
Total Points Won
63
|
4-6 6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Fajing Sun
57%
(
44 of
77)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
4
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rinky Hijikata
Player
Ji Sung Nam
65%
(
87 of
134)
1st Serve %
66%
(
92 of
139)
5
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
58 of
87)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
62 of
92)
45%
(
21 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
16 of
47)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
41%
(
55 of
134)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
61 of
139)
140
Total Points Won
133
|
6-7(5) 7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Chung Vs Nam Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
