A. Kovacevic
To Win
E. Ruusuvuori
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W W L L W LForm
W L W W L L L L W LThey have played 2 sets in total, with Chung winning 2 and Ruusuvuori winning 0. The last match between Chung and Ruusuvuori was at the Busan Challenger, 14-04-2025, Round: First, Surface: Hard, with Hyeon Chung getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Hyeon Chung | 1 |
Emil Ruusuvuori | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Busan Challenger(14-04-2025)
Chung | Stats | Ruusuvuori |
---|---|---|
76% (22-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 40% (6-9) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
394 | Ranking | 254 |
19 | Highest Rank | 37 |
29 | Age | 26 |
R | Plays | R |
17 | Titles | 10 |
66% (278-145) | Career Total W/L | 61% (285-186) |
$2,529,406 | Career Prize Money | $2,614,675 |
2 | YTD Titles | 0 |
1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
25 May 2025 / First
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
French Open - Paris atp
25 May 2025 / First
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 6-4 |
![]() ![]()
Hyeon Chung
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
49%
(
32 of
65)
2
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
3
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 6 |
2 | Aces (Total) | 8 |
4 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
1:21:58 | Average Match Time | 1:21:58 |
68% (36/53) | 1st Serve % | 49% (32/65) |
89% (32/36) | 1st Serve Win % | 75% (24/32) |
41% (7/17) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (13/33) |
33% (3/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/5) |
43% (28/65) | Return Points Win % | 26% (14/53) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Once upon a time on the tennis court, two titans, Ruusuvuori and Chung, prepare to duel. Our story begins with the notorious second serve – a well-tested measure of a player’s resilience. Ruusuvuori’s second serve has been whispering sweet victories, as it captures 42.81% of points. Meanwhile, Chung’s serve boldly declares its independence with a 39.95% success rate. Second-serve-intrigue? Indeed!
Now, let’s shift to the thrilling realm of return games. If your detective cap is on straight, you’ll note Ruusuvuori snags 48.99% of opponents' second serve points, while Chung plays catch-up with 44.8%. It’s the first serve returns, though, where things get amusingly unpredictable – Ruusuvuori at a stealthy 26.21% can't quite outshine Chung's savvy 30.73%. Who gets top marks in this guessing game? It's closer than a squirrel on the hunt for acorns!
Fear not, for we delve deeper into the saga by examining the under-pressure performances. Breakpoint saves become our next chapter: Ruusovuori, akin to a superhero with a 65.98% save rate laser beams his way out of tight spots as Chung bravely resists at 44.71%. It seems Ruusovuori fancies himself a Houdini when the heat is on!
As the plot thickens, we cast our gaze upon broader performance facades. Ruusuvuori might be trudging at 42.31% win rate with his 11/15 record, while Chung, the exuberant tortoise, races ahead with 73.53%, boasting 25 wins to only 9 losses. It appears consistency at an average day at the office is key to Chung's plotline.
We unveil our surface-loving characters in the next twist. Ruusuvuori adores the I.hard, smiting foes with a 68% win record, yet he regards clay as his Achilles’ heel – a slippery 47%. Chung, on the other hand, gleefully prances on hard courts with a sound 70% win rate, but grass mystifies him, leaving a dubious 20% behind. Certainly, a game of surfaces!
Our anecdote nears its crescendo, evaluating the player echelon where Ruusuvuori and Chung have adventured over the last year. Ruusuvuori juggles the Challengers/ITF tournaments earning wins in just 42.86% of his quests, with a modest 6/8 record. Conversely, Chung slays the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a gallant 77.42%, culminating his tales of triumph with a record of 24 victories and only 7 defeats.
Opponents wise, Ruusuvuori has faced competitors ranked at an average of 300.31, while choruses of Chung's challengers swing in at 350.47. Not exactly the league of dragons, but formidable nonetheless! When the tale spins toward deciding set drama, Ruusuvuori’s chances come up even with 50% wins, whereas Chung trudges at 38% in all nail-biters.
Ladies and Gentlemen, in the whimsical kingdom of tennis stats, Ruusuvuori edges his head over Chung’s turf. Whispers of potential betrayal on breakpoints continue to echo as Ruusuvuori delights with 36.17% conversions, cheekily outclassing Chung's 34.21%. As the grand match unfurls, our brave adventurers storm the court. But prediction sheets whisper Ruusuvuori as the favorite for a high-noon victory – the stats have spoken!
Chung vs Ruusuvuori Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
![]() ![]()
Shintaro Imai
Player
Hyeon Chung
58%
(
80 of
139)
1st Serve %
53%
(
46 of
87)
8
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
10
54%
(
43 of
80)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
42%
(
25 of
59)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
26%
(
8 of
31)
51%
(
71 of
139)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
46 of
87)
114
Total Points Won
112
|
0-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Hyeon Chung
Player
Hikaru Shiraishi
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
77)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
44%
(
29 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
76
Total Points Won
67
|
1-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Filip Peliwo
Player
Hyeon Chung
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Hyeon Chung
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Hyeon Chung
Player
James Kent Trotter
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Hyeon Chung
Player
Constant Lestienne
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
7
60%
(
18 of
30)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
47%
(
26 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Hyeon Chung
51%
(
26 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
9
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Hyeon Chung
Player
Li Tu
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
62%
(
65 of
105)
4
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
3
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
43 of
65)
39%
(
14 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
14 of
40)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
40%
(
35 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
48 of
105)
100
Total Points Won
92
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Jerome Kym
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve %
52%
(
22 of
42)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
54
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Emil Ruusuvuori
Player
Luka Mikrut
71%
(
70 of
99)
1st Serve %
59%
(
52 of
88)
6
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
40 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
88)
99
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Ilia Simakin
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Hyeon Chung
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
49%
(
32 of
65)
2
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
3
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve %
50%
(
15 of
30)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
93%
(
14 of
15)
1st Serve Won
87%
(
13 of
15)
20%
(
1 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
5 of
20)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
25
Total Points Won
25
|
4-4 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
12
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Emil Ruusuvuori
Player
Gauthier Onclin
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
79)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Emil Ruusuvuori
Player
Oleg Prihodko
57%
(
46 of
81)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
73)
6
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
27 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
66% (278/145) | Win/Loss | 61% (285/186) |
62% (635/383) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (642/470) |
55% (5110/4184) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (5660/4980) |
69% (224/100) | Hard Win/Loss | 65% (120/66) |
59% (30/21) | Clay Win/Loss | 47% (48/55) |
58% (22/16) | Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (103/50) |
20% (2/8) | Grass Win/Loss | 48% (14/15) |
0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.33 |
1194 | Aces Total | 1734 |
0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
1035 | Total Double Faults | 1382 |
1:24:11 | Average Match Time | 1:34:13 |
521 | Average Opponent Rank | 358.69 |
62% (15127/24205) | 1st Serve % | 65% (20114/31129) |
70% (10645/15127) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (14255/20114) |
51% (4595/9078) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (5583/11015) |
45% (1221/2734) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (1309/3138) |
41% (10469/25256) | Return Points Win % | 40% (12797/31971) |
58% (22/16) | Slam W/L | 39% (11/17) |
52% (17/16) | Masters W/L | 51% (28/27) |
83% (10/2) | Cups W/L | 67% (14/7) |
56% (59/47) | Main Tour W/L | 57% (86/64) |
69% (97/43) | Challenger W/L | 63% (72/43) |
78% (73/21) | Futures W/L | 73% (74/28) |
66% (247/377) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (270/435) |
68% (28/41) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 39% (11/28) |
53% (67/126) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (81/152) |
59% (69/117) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (75/133) |
87% (274/239) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (286/254) |
13% (274/35) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (286/32) |
26% (149/39) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (183/30) |