G. Johns
To Win
H. Chung
To Win
Hyeon Chung vs Dane Sweeny Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L W L W L W W
Form
W L W W L W W W W LHead-To-Head: Chung 1 - 0 Sweeny
They have played 2 sets in total, with Chung winning 2 and Sweeny winning 0. The last match between Chung and Sweeny was at the Tyler Challenger, 01-06-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Hard, with Hyeon Chung getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Hyeon Chung | 1 |
| Dane Sweeny | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Tyler Challenger(01-06-2025)
Hyeon Chung
Dane Sweeny
6
2
6
4
| Chung | Stats | Sweeny |
|---|---|---|
| 71% (29-12) | YTD Win/Loss | 54% (22-19) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 381 | Ranking | 575 |
| 19 | Highest Rank | 194 |
| 29 | Age | 24 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 17 | Titles | 7 |
| 66% (285-150) | Career Total W/L | 55% (187-154) |
| $2,529,406 | Career Prize Money | $346,065 |
| 2 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
09 Jul 2025 / First
ODDS
Upcoming Match
09 Jul 2025 / First
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sinner VS Shelton PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
09 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Fritz VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
11 Jul 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Hyeon Chung
Player
Dane Sweeny
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
7
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
78)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 1:52:53 | Average Match Time | 1:52:53 |
| 65% (37/57) | 1st Serve % | 60% (47/78) |
| 68% (25/37) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (27/47) |
| 45% (9/20) | 2nd Serve Win % | 32% (10/31) |
| 33% (5/15) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 20% (2/10) |
| 53% (41/78) | Return Points Win % | 40% (23/57) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Hyeon Chung Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
74%
(
43 of
58)
3
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
2
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Benjamin Thomas George
57%
(
42 of
74)
1st Serve %
75%
(
44 of
59)
0
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
45%
(
33 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Hyeon Chung
67%
(
72 of
108)
1st Serve %
47%
(
44 of
93)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
8
58%
(
42 of
72)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
61%
(
22 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
41%
(
44 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
93)
105
Total Points Won
96
|
6-2 1-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Leo Vithoontien
50%
(
29 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
7
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicolas Ian Kotzen
Player
Hyeon Chung
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve %
54%
(
51 of
94)
7
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
9
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
28 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
94)
97
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Bjorn Swenson
42%
(
22 of
52)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Hyeon Chung
63%
(
57 of
90)
1st Serve %
54%
(
50 of
92)
4
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
11
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
30%
(
10 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
49%
(
44 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
45 of
92)
91
Total Points Won
91
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Pranav Kumar
53%
(
20 of
38)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
65%
(
13 of
20)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
13 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Dane Sweeny Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Dane Sweeny
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
83)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
79
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Noah Zamora
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Miles Jones
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
33%
(
8 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
43%
(
27 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Nicholas Godsick
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Maciej Rajski
46%
(
26 of
56)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
69)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
7 of
32)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Trevor Svajda
Player
Dane Sweeny
60%
(
52 of
86)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
35 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
74)
81
Total Points Won
79
|
2-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Emon Van Loben Sels
60%
(
72 of
120)
1st Serve %
66%
(
67 of
102)
1
Aces
6
8
Double Faults
4
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
47 of
67)
48%
(
23 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
43%
(
51 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
42 of
102)
111
Total Points Won
111
|
5-7 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Max Fardanesh
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
50%
(
24 of
48)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
53
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 66% (285/150) | Win/Loss | 55% (187/154) |
| 62% (652/393) | Sets Win/Loss | 52% (418/381) |
| 55% (5251/4290) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (3868/3677) |
| 69% (231/105) | Hard Win/Loss | 58% (154/112) |
| 59% (30/21) | Clay Win/Loss | 44% (17/22) |
| 58% (22/16) | Indoor Hard W/L | 37% (7/12) |
| 20% (2/8) | Grass Win/Loss | 53% (9/8) |
| 0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.2 |
| 1215 | Aces Total | 740 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.29 |
| 1101 | Total Double Faults | 1076 |
| 1:24:58 | Average Match Time | 1:39:21 |
| 525.96 | Average Opponent Rank | 278.87 |
| 62% (15580/25035) | 1st Serve % | 63% (14055/22429) |
| 70% (10952/15580) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (9206/14055) |
| 51% (4781/9455) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (4231/8374) |
| 45% (1270/2839) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (992/2292) |
| 42% (10847/26092) | Return Points Win % | 41% (8980/22092) |
| 58% (22/16) | Slam W/L | 47% (7/8) |
| 52% (17/16) | Masters W/L | 60% (3/2) |
| 83% (10/2) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 56% (59/47) | Main Tour W/L | 43% (3/4) |
| 69% (103/47) | Challenger W/L | 41% (49/71) |
| 77% (74/22) | Futures W/L | 64% (125/69) |
| 65% (254/389) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (184/337) |
| 68% (28/41) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 52% (67/129) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (42/89) |
| 57% (69/120) | Deciding Set Win % | 61% (70/114) |
| 87% (283/246) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (163/143) |
| 13% (283/37) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (163/20) |
| 26% (152/39) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (178/44) |
Chung vs. Sweeny Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
