Hugo Grenier vs Nerman Fatic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Grenier vs Fatic analysis and find out who is favored!
Hugo Grenier vs Nerman Fatic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Grenier has won 44.6% of points on his second serve, while Fatic has won 47.95%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Grenier, in recent form, has won 47.47% of his opponent's second serve points, while Fatic has won 46.69%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.82% and 35.05% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Grenier has saved 61.79% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fatic has saved 58.1% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Grenier has won 45.9% of matches played (W/L 28/ 33), with Fatic winning 53.62% (W/L 37/ 32) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Grenier has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 211/ 110), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 42% (W/L 5/ 7). Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 279/ 190), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Grenier has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 44% of matches (W/L 11/ 14), where as Fatic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 24/ 24). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Grenier winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Grenier winning 2 and Fatic winning 0. The last match between Grenier and Fatic was at the Grand Prix Hassan II - Marrakech, 02-04-2023, Q1 round, Clay with Hugo Grenier getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:11:47.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Grenier and Fatic have played a deciding set 0 times, with Grenier winning 0 times and Fatic 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Grenier winning 0, and Fatic 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Grenier has played against opponents with an average rank of 260.57 while Fatic has played against players with an average rank of 276.42.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Grenier has won 61% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fatic has won 48% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Grenier has converted 39.47% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fatic has converted 41.34% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Grenier 1 - 0 Fatic
11
Total
0
Mast
5
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
6
Minor
153
Rank
95
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
211
Rank
191
High
29
Age
R
Plays
8
Total
0
Mast
2
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
6
Minor
Form
57% (382-283)
Career Total W/L
57% (339-253)
50% (13-13)
YTD W/L
38% (6-10)
$572,165
Career Prize Money
$73,995
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Hugo Grenier | Nerman Fatic |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 14 | 10 |
Aces (Total) | 2 | 3 |
DFs (Total) | 1 | 1 |
Avg Match Time | 2:11:47 | 2:11:47 |
1st Serve % | 65% (51/79) | 69% (48/70) |
1st Serve Win% | 75% (38/51) | 60% (29/48) |
2nd Serve Win% | 54% (15/28) | 68% (15/22) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 13% (1/8) |
Return Points W% | 37% (26/70) | 33% (26/79) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-5 7-5 |
Hugo Grenier
Player
Nerman Fatic
65%
(
51 of
79)
1st Serve %
69%
(
48 of
70)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
15 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
70)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Hugo Grenier | Nerman Fatic |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 50% (13/13) | 38% (6/10) |
Sets Win/Loss | 49% (32/33) | 42% (16/22) |
Games Win/Loss | 49% (313/325) | 46% (163/193) |
Hard Win/Loss | 59% (10/7) | 50% (3/3) |
Clay Win/Loss | 20% (1/4) | 22% (2/7) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (2/2) | 100% (1/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.66 | 0.43 |
Aces Total | 208 | 75 |
DFs per game | 0.35 | 0.2 |
DFs Total | 111 | 34 |
Avg Match Time | 1:55:54 | 1:36:29 |
Avg Opp Rank | 275.27 | 336.38 |
1st Serve % | 65% (1304/2013) | 63% (632/1009) |
1st Serve W% | 71% (926/1304) | 69% (434/632) |
2nd Serve W% | 44% (311/709) | 48% (181/377) |
BPs Won% Total | 40% (70/173) | 35% (29/84) |
Return Pts W% | 37% (724/1972) | 36% (389/1068) |
Slam W/L | 80% (4/1) | 50% (1/1) |
Masters W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 50% (6/6) | 50% (1/1) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/4) | 27% (3/8) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (12/24) | 40% (6/15) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/1) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 58% (7/12) | 50% (3/6) |
Deciding Set W% | 56% (5/9) | 40% (2/5) |
1st set W, W | 82% (11/9) | 63% (8/5) |
1st set W, L | 18% (11/2) | 38% (8/3) |
1st set L, W | 27% (15/4) | 13% (8/1) |
Hugo Grenier Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Francesco Maestrelli
Player
Hugo Grenier
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
46%
(
22 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Roberto Carballes Baena
Player
Hugo Grenier
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
8
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Juncheng Shang
Player
Hugo Grenier
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
20 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Hugo Grenier
Player
Nicolas Alvarez Varona
68%
(
51 of
75)
1st Serve %
61%
(
45 of
74)
7
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
27 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
77
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Marc-Andrea Huesler
Player
Hugo Grenier
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Hugo Grenier
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
0
88%
(
35 of
40)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Hugo Grenier
Player
Thanasi Kokkinakis
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve %
57%
(
26 of
46)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
90%
(
19 of
21)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
17%
(
6 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
50
Total Points Won
31
|
6-4 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran
Player
Hugo Grenier
58%
(
45 of
77)
1st Serve %
48%
(
33 of
69)
5
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
6
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
44%
(
34 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
77
Total Points Won
69
|
2-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alexandre Muller
Player
Hugo Grenier
59%
(
45 of
76)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
5
Aces
11
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
37 of
45)
68%
(
21 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
9 of
32)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
25 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
77)
82
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Hugo Grenier
Player
Alex Molcan
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Nerman Fatic Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Jesper De Jong
Player
Nerman Fatic
57%
(
49 of
86)
1st Serve %
70%
(
58 of
83)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
29 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
28 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 7-6(6) 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Nerman Fatic
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Nerman Fatic
Player
Edoardo Lavagno
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
23 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Zsombor Piros
Player
Nerman Fatic
73%
(
57 of
78)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
85)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Riccardo Bonadio
Player
Nerman Fatic
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ugo Blanchet
Player
Nerman Fatic
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Dimitar Kuzmanov
Player
Nerman Fatic
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Franco Agamenone
Player
Nerman Fatic
73%
(
66 of
91)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
89)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
43%
(
39 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
89)
97
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nerman Fatic
Player
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
69%
(
59 of
86)
1st Serve %
64%
(
63 of
99)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
28 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
99)
103
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jakub Mensik
Player
Nerman Fatic
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H |
view more