Hugo Grenier vs Li Tu Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W L W W L L L L
Form
L W W L W L L L L LHead To Head: Grenier 1 - 0 Tu
They have played 2 sets in total, with Grenier winning 2 and Tu winning 0. The last match between Grenier and Tu was at the Gwangju Challenger, 23-04-2025, Round: First, Surface: Hard, with Hugo Grenier getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Hugo Grenier | 1 |
| Li Tu | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Gwangju Challenger(23-04-2025)
Hugo Grenier
Li Tu
6
4
6
2
| Grenier | Stats | Tu |
|---|---|---|
| 48% (15-16) | YTD Win/Loss | 41% (9-13) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 176 | Ranking | 168 |
| 95 | Highest Rank | 164 |
| 29 | Age | 28 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 11 | Titles | 10 |
| 57% (423-319) | Career Total W/L | 61% (198-125) |
| $733,015 | Career Prize Money | $356,930 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Carle VS Li PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Shnaider VS Sobolieva PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Hugo Grenier
Player
Li Tu
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve %
53%
(
26 of
49)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
29%
(
5 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
45%
(
28 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:18:53 | Average Match Time | 1:18:53 |
| 73% (45/62) | 1st Serve % | 53% (26/49) |
| 64% (29/45) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (14/26) |
| 29% (5/17) | 2nd Serve Win % | 30% (7/23) |
| 86% (6/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (3/6) |
| 57% (28/49) | Return Points Win % | 45% (28/62) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Grenier vs Tu Match Preview :
Grenier and Tu have demonstrated commendable performances in recent months, especially in terms of second serve execution. Grenier has secured 47.4% of points on their second serve, slightly edging past Tu, who has achieved a 44.44% success rate. This statistic is crucial as it bears a strong correlation with match outcome predictions.
Analyzing return game performance, Grenier has outperformed Tu in recent form by winning 46.47% of their opponent's second serve points, compared to Tu's 45.89%. Furthermore, in first serve returns, Grenier holds an advantage with 23.85% over Tu's 21.98%. Such figures are significant indicating which player might have an upper hand in a head-to-head encounter.
In terms of pressure situations, Tu has shown slight superiority in saving breakpoints, with a success rate of 54.08%, surpassing Grenier's 53.16%. This metric serves as an insightful tool for in-game betting predictions. Performance over the last year reveals that Tu holds a marginally better match-winning proportion of 55.71% (W/L 39/31) compared to Grenier's 54.29% (W/L 38/32), thereby contributing to overall head-to-head prediction analysis.
Examining surface preferences, both players exhibit their most successful career win percentages on hard surfaces, with Grenier at 65% (W/L 232/123) and Tu equaling this figure at 65% (W/L 141/77). Conversely, Grenier's weaker performances appear on clay with a 42% win rate (W/L 54/74), while Tu's is on grass with a 54% win rate (W/L 14/12).
Regarding player level, both Grenier and Tu have primarily competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments over $10K in the past year. Grenier has won 52% (W/L 26/24) over these contests, whereas Tu boasts a slightly better performance at 54.35% (W/L 25/21). It’s essential to consider the players' performance relative to the event level they participate in.
In assessing opponent quality over the past 12 months, Tu has faced opponents with a higher average rank of 208.11, in comparison to Grenier's average opponent rank of 305.46. If the upcoming match heads into a deciding set, Grenier displays better form, winning 56% of deciding sets compared to Tu’s 48%.
Analyzing breakpoint opportunities, Tu appears more efficient, converting 31.29% of such chances, surpassing Grenier who converts 28.47%. This aspect is crucial for live betting scenarios when players encounter breakpoint opportunities.
Based on these comprehensive statistics, Tu holds a slight edge over Grenier, primarily due to their stronger performance in broader match contexts and under pressure situations. This positions Tu as the more likely winner in the upcoming match.
Grenier vs Tu Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Hugo Grenier Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Eliot Spizzirri
Player
Hugo Grenier
63%
(
66 of
105)
1st Serve %
70%
(
88 of
125)
1
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
6
73%
(
48 of
66)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
61 of
88)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
35%
(
37 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
48 of
125)
116
Total Points Won
114
|
7-6(6) 4-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Shevchenko
Player
Hugo Grenier
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
75%
(
55 of
73)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
73)
80
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rio Noguchi
Player
Hugo Grenier
62%
(
47 of
76)
1st Serve %
55%
(
40 of
73)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
31 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
73)
82
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Hugo Grenier
57%
(
39 of
68)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
7
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hugo Grenier
Player
Moerani Bouzige
54%
(
33 of
61)
1st Serve %
51%
(
33 of
65)
3
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
3
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
88%
(
29 of
33)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
24 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hugo Grenier
Player
Charles Chen
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
63)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Hugo Grenier
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
66%
(
41 of
62)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
view more
Li Tu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Li Tu
71%
(
60 of
85)
1st Serve %
56%
(
57 of
101)
7
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
48 of
60)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
26 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
101)
99
Total Points Won
87
|
3-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fajing Sun
Player
Li Tu
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
47%
(
28 of
60)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yosuke Watanuki
Player
Li Tu
43%
(
47 of
110)
1st Serve %
54%
(
58 of
107)
13
Aces
14
9
Double Faults
13
91%
(
43 of
47)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
43 of
58)
49%
(
31 of
63)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
36 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
39 of
107)
113
Total Points Won
104
|
6-4 6-7(8) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hugo Grenier
Player
Li Tu
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve %
53%
(
26 of
49)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
29%
(
5 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
45%
(
28 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Li Tu
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
62%
(
65 of
105)
4
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
3
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
43 of
65)
39%
(
14 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
14 of
40)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
40%
(
35 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
48 of
105)
100
Total Points Won
92
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
.jpg)
Li Tu
Player
Marat Sharipov (RUS)
63%
(
55 of
88)
1st Serve %
44%
(
30 of
68)
5
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
2
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eliot Spizzirri
Player
Li Tu
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve %
72%
(
44 of
61)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Li Tu
Player
Giulio Zeppieri
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
6
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
4
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
6 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (423/319) | Win/Loss | 61% (198/125) |
| 56% (967/770) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (438/300) |
| 52% (8639/7946) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (3728/3236) |
| 65% (235/126) | Hard Win/Loss | 64% (141/80) |
| 42% (54/76) | Clay Win/Loss | 56% (25/20) |
| 54% (126/108) | Indoor Hard W/L | 58% (18/13) |
| 47% (8/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 54% (14/12) |
| 0.47 | Aces Per Game | 0.43 |
| 3806 | Aces Total | 1455 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 2027 | Total Double Faults | 640 |
| 1:30:25 | Average Match Time | 1:20:2 |
| 466.06 | Average Opponent Rank | 367.24 |
| 64% (28828/45177) | 1st Serve % | 61% (11185/18278) |
| 71% (20462/28828) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (8120/11185) |
| 48% (7777/16348) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (3704/7093) |
| 41% (1844/4497) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (767/1803) |
| 39% (18223/46370) | Return Points Win % | 39% (7410/18797) |
| 47% (17/19) | Slam W/L | 38% (6/10) |
| 53% (9/8) | Masters W/L | 63% (5/3) |
| 39% (16/25) | Main Tour W/L | 57% (13/10) |
| 53% (185/165) | Challenger W/L | 48% (61/66) |
| 66% (196/102) | Futures W/L | 76% (113/36) |
| 58% (411/713) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (198/319) |
| 35% (6/17) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/4) |
| 51% (125/243) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (54/103) |
| 52% (125/240) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (48/86) |
| 84% (415/348) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (190/170) |
| 16% (415/65) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (190/19) |
| 23% (327/75) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (133/28) |
Grenier vs. Tu Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
