Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Hugo Grenier vs Illya Marchenko Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Grenier vs Marchenko analysis and find out who is favored!
Hugo Grenier vs Illya Marchenko Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Grenier has won 45.3% of points on his second serve, while Marchenko has won 50%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Grenier, in recent form, has won 47.3% of his opponent's second serve points, while Marchenko has won 47.13%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.54% and 30.58% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Grenier has saved 63% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Marchenko has saved 65.68% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Grenier has won 47.54% of matches played (W/L 29/ 32), with Marchenko winning 58.33% (W/L 35/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Grenier has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 211/ 110), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 42% (W/L 5/ 7). Marchenko has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 231/ 136), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 63/ 84).
- Player level: In the last year, Grenier has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 45.83% of matches (W/L 11/ 13), where as Marchenko has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 62.5% of matches (W/L 30/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Grenier has played against opponents with an average rank of 252.38 while Marchenko has played against players with an average rank of 304.92.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Grenier has won 63% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Marchenko has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Grenier has converted 39.34% of breakpoint opportunities, and Marchenko has converted 42.07% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Grenier 0 - 0 Marchenko
159
Rank
95
High
28
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
239
Rank
49
High
36
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
Form
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
58% (382-282)
Career Total W/L
57% (598-443)
52% (13-12)
YTD W/L
31% (4-9)
$586,815
Career Prize Money
$1,217,273
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| w/o | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Hugo Grenier | Illya Marchenko |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 52% (13/12) | 31% (4/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 51% (32/31) | 35% (11/20) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (309/313) | 48% (151/166) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 59% (10/7) | 29% (2/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (2/2) | 33% (2/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.68 | 0.42 |
| Aces Total | 208 | 65 |
| DFs per game | 0.35 | 0.3 |
| DFs Total | 106 | 46 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:57:4 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 255.96 | 248.92 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (1264/1954) | 56% (606/1081) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (906/1264) | 68% (411/606) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (308/690) | 49% (234/475) |
| BPs Won% Total | 40% (67/166) | 39% (33/84) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (702/1924) | 36% (366/1008) |
| Slam W/L | 80% (4/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (6/6) | 33% (1/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/3) | 33% (3/6) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 52% (12/23) | 31% (4/13) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 58% (7/12) | 30% (3/10) |
| Deciding Set W% | 56% (5/9) | 40% (2/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 82% (11/9) | 80% (5/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 18% (11/2) | 20% (5/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (14/4) | 0% (8/0) |
Hugo Grenier Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Roberto Carballes Baena
Player
Hugo Grenier
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
8
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juncheng Shang
Player
Hugo Grenier
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
20 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hugo Grenier
Player
Nicolas Alvarez Varona
68%
(
51 of
75)
1st Serve %
61%
(
45 of
74)
7
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
27 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
77
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marc-Andrea Huesler
Player
Hugo Grenier
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Hugo Grenier
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
0
88%
(
35 of
40)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hugo Grenier
Player
Thanasi Kokkinakis
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve %
57%
(
26 of
46)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
90%
(
19 of
21)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
17%
(
6 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
50
Total Points Won
31
|
6-4 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran
Player
Hugo Grenier
58%
(
45 of
77)
1st Serve %
48%
(
33 of
69)
5
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
6
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
44%
(
34 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
77
Total Points Won
69
|
2-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexandre Muller
Player
Hugo Grenier
59%
(
45 of
76)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
5
Aces
11
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
37 of
45)
68%
(
21 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
9 of
32)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
25 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
77)
82
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hugo Grenier
Player
Alex Molcan
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hugo Grenier
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
29 of
46)
10
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Illya Marchenko Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Seong Chan Hong
Player
Illya Marchenko
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
45%
(
30 of
67)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James Duckworth
Player
Illya Marchenko
47%
(
48 of
102)
1st Serve %
56%
(
62 of
111)
8
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
7
81%
(
39 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
43 of
62)
46%
(
25 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
46 of
111)
110
Total Points Won
103
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Rio Noguchi
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
73%
(
19 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Alex Bolt
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
34%
(
10 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ergi Kirkin
Player
Illya Marchenko
64%
(
60 of
94)
1st Serve %
64%
(
55 of
86)
10
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
2
78%
(
47 of
60)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
41 of
55)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
32 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
86)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Illya Marchenko
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
59%
(
53 of
90)
10
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(6) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Yannik Steinegger
64%
(
54 of
84)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
8
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
29 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
77)
87
Total Points Won
74
|
6-2 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Illya Marchenko
43%
(
25 of
58)
1st Serve %
39%
(
24 of
62)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Illya Marchenko
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
65 of
103)
16
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
88%
(
42 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
45 of
65)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
14 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Brandon Holt
49%
(
55 of
112)
1st Serve %
70%
(
89 of
127)
9
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
1
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
57 of
89)
51%
(
29 of
57)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
37%
(
41 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
52 of
127)
123
Total Points Won
116
|
7-6(3) 6-7(4) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
view more
Grenier Vs Marchenko Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
