H. Sakatsume
To Win
A. Omae
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L L W W W W LForm
W W W W L L W W L WThey have played 2 sets in total, with Sakatsume winning 2 and Ma winning 0. The last match between Sakatsume and Ma was at the W50 Kofu, 21-03-2025, Round: Quarterfinals, Surface: Hard, with Himeno Sakatsume getting the victory 6-0 6-3.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Himeno Sakatsume | 1 |
Yexin Ma | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W50 Kofu(21-03-2025)
Sakatsume | Stats | Ma |
---|---|---|
63% (17-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 58% (14-10) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
252 | Ranking | 270 |
164 | Highest Rank | 177 |
23 | Age | 25 |
- | Plays | - |
6 | Titles | 6 |
61% (207-135) | Career Total W/L | 54% (270-227) |
$21,560 | Career Prize Money | $139,875 |
0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
14 May 2025 / First
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome atp
13 May 2025 / Fourth
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome wta
13 May 2025 / Quarterfinals
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-0 6-3 |
![]() ![]()
Himeno Sakatsume
Player
Yexin Ma
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
73%
(
36 of
49)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
43%
(
30 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
71
Total Points Won
48
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 3 |
0 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
1 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
1:12:23 | Average Match Time | 1:12:23 |
66% (46/70) | 1st Serve % | 73% (36/49) |
59% (27/46) | 1st Serve Win % | 44% (16/36) |
54% (13/24) | 2nd Serve Win % | 15% (2/13) |
40% (6/15) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 20% (2/10) |
63% (31/49) | Return Points Win % | 43% (30/70) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Analyzing recent second serve performance, Sakatsume has managed to secure 41.46% of points in the past six months, whereas Ma has slightly lagged with 39.25%. Recognizing the correlation between these statistics and match prediction accuracy could prove vital for those speculating on the match outcome.
Looking at return game statistics, Sakatsume has won 43.83% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ma has achieved a slightly higher percentage with 45.74%. For first serve returns, the numbers stand at 33.92% for Sakatsume and a better 35.65% for Ma, numbers that influence predictions regarding this head-to-head competition.
Break point conversion provides further insights: Sakatsume has a conversion rate of 42.2%, while Ma has a slightly more efficient rate of 43.96%. This figure serves as a strong indicator in in-game live betting scenarios when either player faces a breakpoint.
Examining performance over the last year, Sakatsume has displayed a superior form, winning 60.32% of their matches (W/L 38/25) compared to Ma, who has won just 41.27% (W/L 26/37). This performance metric further highlights Sakatsume as the potential favorite in their upcoming meeting.
On their favorite surfaces, Sakatsume excels on indoor hard courts with a 67% win rate (W/L 30/15), while Grass remains their least successful surface at 33% (W/L 1/2). Ma, contrastingly, attains the highest win percentage on Clay with 56% (W/L 39/31), but struggles on indoor hard courts, winning only 52% (W/L 11/10).
The under-pressure analysis suggests Ma holds a slight edge, saving 51.84% of breakpoints compared to Sakatsume’s 48.08%. This statistic is particularly beneficial during in-game betting predictions.
Over the past 12 months, Sakatsume’s opponents had an average rank of 349.11, while Ma has faced higher-ranked competition with an average of 338.35. This suggests Ma's experience against tough opponents could be a deciding factor.
When the match approaches a deciding set, Sakatsume’s win rate in deciding sets is 47%, a slight advantage over Ma's 44%. This stat might influence live predictions if the match becomes closely contested.
Overall, considering all statistics, Sakatsume emerges as the predicted winner, bolstered by a higher overall win percentage and comparable performance across different metrics. While Ma shows prowess in certain areas, the aggregated stats favor Sakatsume to clinch the victory in this anticipated match.
Sakatsume vs Ma Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
F |
![]() ![]()
Emerson Jones
Player
Himeno Sakatsume
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve %
69%
(
52 of
75)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
47%
(
34 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
39 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Himeno Sakatsume
Player
Zarina Diyas
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
70%
(
58 of
83)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
45 of
83)
89
Total Points Won
67
|
5-7 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Himeno Sakatsume
Player
Eri Shimizu
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve %
69%
(
56 of
81)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
25%
(
3 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
81)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Himeno Sakatsume
Player
Lisa-Marie Rioux
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
46%
(
13 of
28)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
43%
(
18 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Himeno Sakatsume
Player
Kisa Yoshioka
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
46%
(
30 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Emerson Jones
Player
Himeno Sakatsume
58%
(
62 of
107)
1st Serve %
60%
(
44 of
73)
0
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
4
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
44%
(
20 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
49%
(
52 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
73)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Zarina Diyas
Player
Himeno Sakatsume
79%
(
85 of
108)
1st Serve %
67%
(
58 of
86)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
60%
(
51 of
85)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
46 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
86)
102
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Himeno Sakatsume
Player
Elena Micic
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
69%
(
50 of
72)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
22)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
42%
(
25 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
43 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Yexin Ma
Player
Michiru Furuya
52%
(
26 of
50)
1st Serve %
47%
(
18 of
38)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
60
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Shiho Akita
Player
Yexin Ma
54%
(
34 of
63)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
8 of
31)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
46%
(
29 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
37 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Yexin Ma
Player
Mayuka Aikawa
47%
(
25 of
53)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
64%
(
16 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Yexin Ma
Player
Chika Miyahara
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
70%
(
38 of
54)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Erika Sema
Player
Yexin Ma
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
15 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
37 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Haruka Kaji
Player
Yexin Ma
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Yexin Ma
Player
Zongyu Li
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
72%
(
42 of
58)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Yexin Ma
Player
Shiho Tsujioka
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
66%
(
63 of
96)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
96)
88
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
61% (207/135) | Win/Loss | 54% (270/227) |
58% (456/325) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (612/524) |
55% (3908/3233) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (5396/4906) |
61% (140/89) | Hard Win/Loss | 53% (201/175) |
51% (18/17) | Clay Win/Loss | 56% (39/31) |
64% (48/27) | Indoor Hard W/L | 61% (23/15) |
33% (1/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 54% (7/6) |
0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
354 | Aces Total | 562 |
0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.3 |
727 | Total Double Faults | 1503 |
1:28:30 | Average Match Time | 1:26:12 |
447.6 | Average Opponent Rank | 487.51 |
66% (13327/20280) | 1st Serve % | 59% (16194/27582) |
61% (8118/13327) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (9895/16194) |
48% (3340/6953) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (5224/11386) |
50% (1317/2654) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1843/3874) |
47% (9538/20156) | Return Points Win % | 47% (13472/28470) |
29% (2/5) | Slam W/L | 33% (2/4) |
0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/2) |
100% (2/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
47% (8/9) | Main Tour W/L | 38% (6/10) |
59% (147/101) | Challenger W/L | 53% (155/135) |
71% (48/20) | Futures W/L | 58% (107/76) |
60% (202/336) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (263/487) |
100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
36% (21/59) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (48/92) |
55% (54/99) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (73/152) |
89% (192/170) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (283/237) |
11% (192/21) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (283/45) |
24% (150/36) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (214/32) |