Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Hernan Casanova vs Nick Chappell Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Casanova vs Chappell analysis and find out who is favored!
Hernan Casanova vs Nick Chappell Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Casanova has won 48.29% of points on his second serve, while Chappell has won 49.45%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Casanova, in recent form, has won 54.6% of his opponent's second serve points, while Chappell has won 52.47%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.05% and 33.6% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Casanova has saved 57.14% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Chappell has saved 56.35% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Casanova has won 52.38% of matches played (W/L 33/ 30), with Chappell winning 51.9% (W/L 41/ 38) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Casanova has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 447/ 260), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Chappell has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 216/ 147), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Casanova has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 44.74% of matches (W/L 17/ 21), where as Chappell has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.64% of matches (W/L 28/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Casanova winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Casanova winning 2 and Chappell winning 0. The last match between Casanova and Chappell was at the Santiago 3 Challenger, 11-10-2021, First, Clay with Hernan Casanova getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:39:18.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Casanova and Chappell have played a deciding set 0 times, with Casanova winning 0 times and Chappell 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Casanova winning 0, and Chappell 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Casanova has played against opponents with an average rank of 338.03 while Chappell has played against players with an average rank of 255.27.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Casanova has won 58% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Chappell has won 38% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Casanova has converted 52.02% of breakpoint opportunities, and Chappell has converted 41.83% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Casanova 1 - 0 Chappell
384
Rank
221
High
30
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
443
Rank
329
High
31
Age
L
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
Form
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
63% (453-268)
Career Total W/L
53% (300-264)
59% (16-11)
YTD W/L
41% (9-13)
$17,445
Career Prize Money
$24,525
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Hernan Casanova | Nick Chappell |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:39:18 | 1:39:18 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (47/69) | 54% (32/59) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 77% (36/47) | 66% (21/32) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 23% (5/22) | 33% (9/27) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (5/10) | 43% (3/7) |
| Return Points W% | 49% (29/59) | 41% (28/69) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Hernan Casanova
Player
Nick Chappell
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
23%
(
5 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Hernan Casanova | Nick Chappell |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 59% (16/11) | 41% (9/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 56% (34/27) | 42% (21/29) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (294/255) | 48% (222/243) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (8/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 59% (16/11) | 25% (1/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.03 | 0.18 |
| Aces Total | 9 | 40 |
| DFs per game | 0.13 | 0.19 |
| DFs Total | 36 | 44 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:46:6 | 1:43:29 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 291.11 | 291.23 |
| 1st Serve % | 75% (1296/1728) | 62% (914/1483) |
| 1st Serve W% | 63% (811/1296) | 65% (594/914) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (209/432) | 47% (270/569) |
| BPs Won% Total | 52% (99/189) | 39% (63/162) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (787/1792) | 40% (611/1543) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 54% (7/6) | 25% (2/6) |
| Futures W/L | 69% (9/4) | 50% (7/7) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 59% (16/27) | 41% (9/22) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 0% (0/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 71% (5/7) | 50% (3/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 93% (14/13) | 80% (10/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 7% (14/1) | 20% (10/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 23% (13/3) | 8% (12/1) |
Hernan Casanova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Hernan Casanova
Player
Felix Corwin
82%
(
82 of
100)
1st Serve %
51%
(
46 of
91)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
70%
(
57 of
82)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
33%
(
33 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
108
Total Points Won
83
|
6-3 6-7(8) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hernan Casanova
Player
Igor Gimenez
78%
(
59 of
76)
1st Serve %
73%
(
61 of
84)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
36 of
61)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
84)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Peter Benjamin Privara
Player
Hernan Casanova
45%
(
15 of
33)
1st Serve %
81%
(
21 of
26)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
80%
(
12 of
15)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
10 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
37
Total Points Won
22
|
6-2 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hernan Casanova
Player
Michiel De Krom
82%
(
84 of
102)
1st Serve %
80%
(
95 of
119)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
65%
(
55 of
84)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
50 of
95)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
40 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
56 of
119)
118
Total Points Won
103
|
6-7(6) 7-6(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hernan Casanova
Player
Ignasi Forcano
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
85)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
20 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ignacio Buse
Player
Hernan Casanova
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hernan Casanova
Player
Tristan Mccormick
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve %
68%
(
27 of
40)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
53
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Alex Marti Pujolras
Player
Hernan Casanova
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
79%
(
41 of
52)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hernan Casanova
Player
Kuzey Cekirge
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve %
56%
(
25 of
45)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
7 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
52
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hernan Casanova
Player
Ryan Nijboer
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Nick Chappell Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Nick Chappell
60%
(
61 of
102)
1st Serve %
69%
(
64 of
93)
0
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
0
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
36%
(
37 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
93)
102
Total Points Won
93
|
2-6 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nick Chappell
Player
Santiago Ruiz Velasco
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
10 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dominik Palan
Player
Nick Chappell
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
9
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Skander Mansouri
Player
Nick Chappell
56%
(
62 of
111)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
94)
15
Aces
3
10
Double Faults
4
79%
(
49 of
62)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
42 of
56)
53%
(
26 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
32%
(
36 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
31 of
94)
106
Total Points Won
99
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nick Chappell
Player
Jose Statham
55%
(
53 of
96)
1st Serve %
48%
(
52 of
108)
11
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
13
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
37 of
52)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
34 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
108)
102
Total Points Won
102
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Niki Kaliyanda Poonacha
Player
Nick Chappell
56%
(
49 of
87)
1st Serve %
60%
(
60 of
100)
9
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
6
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
33 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
42 of
100)
96
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(4) 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Diego Barreto Sanchez
Player
Nick Chappell
44%
(
19 of
43)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
63%
(
12 of
19)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
83%
(
20 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Nick Chappell
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jaime Faria
Player
Nick Chappell
60%
(
62 of
104)
1st Serve %
57%
(
62 of
108)
10
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
1
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
41 of
62)
45%
(
19 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
42 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
108)
109
Total Points Won
103
|
4-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Nick Chappell
71%
(
60 of
84)
1st Serve %
66%
(
47 of
71)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
35 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
83
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
view more
Casanova Vs Chappell Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
