H. Casanova
To Win
M. Kestelboim
To Win
Hernan Casanova vs Patrick Kypson Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W L W W L L
Form
W W W W W W W W W WHead-2-Head: Casanova 0 - 1 Kypson
They have played 3 sets in total, with Casanova winning 1 and Kypson winning 2. The last match between Casanova and Kypson was at the Bogota Challenger, 16-05-2025, Round: Semifinals, Surface: Clay, with Patrick Kypson getting the victory 3-6 7-6(4) 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Hernan Casanova | 0 |
| Patrick Kypson | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Bogota Challenger(16-05-2025)
Patrick Kypson
Hernan Casanova
3
6
7
6
7
5
| Casanova | Stats | Kypson |
|---|---|---|
| 61% (22-14) | YTD Win/Loss | 83% (20-4) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 502 | Ranking | 246 |
| 221 | Highest Rank | 133 |
| 31 | Age | 25 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 24 | Titles | 8 |
| 63% (492-295) | Career Total W/L | 64% (227-130) |
| $17,445 | Career Prize Money | $235,295 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 2 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Upcoming Match
24 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Bonzi VS Holt PREDICTION Grass
Mallorca Championships - Mallorca atp
24 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Garin VS Habib PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
25 Jun 2025 / Q2 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 7-6(4) 7-5 |
Stats 
Patrick Kypson
Player
Hernan Casanova
54%
(
62 of
115)
1st Serve %
61%
(
64 of
105)
8
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
0
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
45%
(
24 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
41%
(
47 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
105)
110
Total Points Won
110
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 1 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 17 | Games Won | 17 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 8 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 2:49:52 | Average Match Time | 2:49:52 |
| 61% (64/105) | 1st Serve % | 54% (62/115) |
| 66% (42/64) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (44/62) |
| 51% (21/41) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (24/53) |
| 36% (4/11) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 67% (4/6) |
| 41% (47/115) | Return Points Win % | 40% (42/105) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Casanova vs Kypson Match Preview :
- How do their second serve performances compare? Kypson has recently excelled, winning 50% of second serve points compared to Casanova's 42.93%.
- On the return game, Casanova leads by securing 48.14% of second serve return points, while Kypson is slightly behind with 46.88%.
- In first serve returns, Casanova has a strong edge at 33.16% versus Kypson's 25.46%.
- Under pressure, Kypson is slightly better, saving 53.42% of breakpoints relative to Casanova's 49.38%.
- Looking at overall win rates over the past year, Casanova holds a 59.62% success rate compared to Kypson's 52.5%.
- Where does each player shine? Both have their best win rates on clay, with Kypson edging out Casanova at 68% compared to 63%.
- Casanova frequently competes in Futures/Satellites tournaments $10K, winning 74.07%, whereas Kypson faces tougher matches in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, with a 54.55% win rate.
- In terms of opponent quality, Kypson has played against a higher average ranked player at 300.07, whereas Casanova's opponents average 368.33.
- If the match extends to a deciding set, Casanova performs better, winning 54% of these situations, over Kypson's 33%.
- Which player is more effective in converting breakpoints? Casanova converts 34.27% of opportunities, surpassing Kypson's 25.37%.
Editorial Prediction (May 16, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming tennis match between Casanova and Kypson promises an intriguing competition, as both players exhibit distinct strengths and areas for potential advantage.
While Kypson has demonstrated superior performance on second serves historically, Casanova shows a formidable game with powerful first serve returns. Additionally, Casanova's capability to convert breakpoints exceeds that of Kypson, providing a critical edge during high-pressure situations.
Casanova's slightly higher win percentage over the past year coupled with strong performance under deciding set conditions could sway this match in his favor, especially given his resilience. Despite Kypson facing tougher opponents generally, Casanova has consistently managed to hold his ground under various circumstances.
Therefore, considering all factors and current statistics, Casanova emerges as the likely winner of the upcoming match.
Casanova vs Kypson Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Hernan Casanova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Alejandro Hernandez
Player
Hernan Casanova
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve %
81%
(
35 of
43)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andrea Collarini
Player
Hernan Casanova
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
72%
(
46 of
64)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hernan Casanova
Player
Maximus Jones
82%
(
42 of
51)
1st Serve %
44%
(
24 of
55)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hernan Casanova
Player
Genaro Alberto Olivieri
91%
(
59 of
65)
1st Serve %
76%
(
47 of
62)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
33%
(
2 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
46%
(
30 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Patrick Kypson
Player
Hernan Casanova
54%
(
62 of
115)
1st Serve %
61%
(
64 of
105)
8
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
0
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
45%
(
24 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
41%
(
47 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
105)
110
Total Points Won
110
|
3-6 7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hernan Casanova
Player
Zdenek Kolar
67%
(
66 of
99)
1st Serve %
69%
(
49 of
71)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
7%
(
1 of
14)
35%
(
35 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
71)
94
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hernan Casanova
Player
Miguel Tobon
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
62)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
7
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hernan Casanova
Player
Mateus Alves
50%
(
52 of
103)
1st Serve %
55%
(
53 of
97)
4
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
5
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
41 of
53)
51%
(
26 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
39%
(
40 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
38 of
97)
101
Total Points Won
99
|
2-6 7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Patrick Kypson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF | w/o | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Patrick Kypson
Player
Trevor Svajda
56%
(
44 of
78)
1st Serve %
46%
(
33 of
71)
7
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
27 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Patrick Kypson
Player
Paul Jubb
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
64)
9
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
9
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
14 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Kypson
Player
Moerani Bouzige
71%
(
74 of
104)
1st Serve %
52%
(
48 of
92)
20
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
4
78%
(
58 of
74)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
37 of
48)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
11)
27%
(
28 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
27 of
92)
103
Total Points Won
93
|
6-4 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Patrick Kypson
Player
Michael Zheng
63%
(
50 of
80)
1st Serve %
44%
(
42 of
96)
4
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
6
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
29 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
96)
92
Total Points Won
84
|
6-1 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Patrick Kypson
Player
Andres Andrade
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Patrick Kypson
Player
Rio Noguchi
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve %
50%
(
22 of
44)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Patrick Kypson
Player
Tyler Zink
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
6
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
27 of
33)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
23 of
62)
59
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63% (492/295) | Win/Loss | 64% (227/130) |
| 60% (1067/712) | Sets Win/Loss | 61% (498/313) |
| 54% (8675/7365) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (4225/3499) |
| 50% (6/6) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (83/58) |
| 63% (486/286) | Clay Win/Loss | 69% (103/47) |
| 0% (0/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 64% (39/22) |
| 0% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) |
| 0.03 | Aces Per Game | 0.43 |
| 200 | Aces Total | 1639 |
| 0.08 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 653 | Total Double Faults | 637 |
| 1:16:25 | Average Match Time | 1:31:5 |
| 514.34 | Average Opponent Rank | 409.06 |
| 77% (30449/39578) | 1st Serve % | 62% (13344/21502) |
| 60% (18389/30449) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (9476/13344) |
| 50% (4592/9126) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (4226/8158) |
| 48% (2403/5056) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (869/1957) |
| 45% (18083/40071) | Return Points Win % | 39% (8309/21261) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 33% (4/8) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 33% (2/4) |
| 30% (6/14) | Main Tour W/L | 45% (5/6) |
| 46% (96/114) | Challenger W/L | 62% (101/62) |
| 70% (390/167) | Futures W/L | 70% (115/50) |
| 64% (481/755) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 64% (225/350) |
| 45% (5/11) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 54% (91/168) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (60/125) |
| 61% (133/217) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (52/96) |
| 89% (462/410) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (224/198) |
| 10% (462/48) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (224/26) |
| 25% (323/80) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (133/29) |
Casanova vs. Kypson Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
