Henry Searle vs Mackenzie Mcdonald Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W L W L L L W L
Form
W W W L W W W L L LHead-To-Head: Searle 0 - 1 Mcdonald
They have played 2 sets in total, with Searle winning 0 and Mcdonald winning 2. The last match between Searle and Mcdonald was at the cinch Championships - London, 15-06-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Grass, with Mackenzie Mcdonald getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Henry Searle | 0 |
| Mackenzie Mcdonald | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: cinch Championships - London(15-06-2025)
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Henry Searle
6
4
6
2
| Searle | Stats | Mcdonald |
|---|---|---|
| 58% (19-14) | YTD Win/Loss | 56% (22-17) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 416 | Ranking | 86 |
| 389 | Highest Rank | 37 |
| 19 | Age | 30 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 0 | Titles | 6 |
| 50% (53-52) | Career Total W/L | 56% (335-264) |
| $14,050 | Career Prize Money | $3,336,540 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Huergo VS Maleckova PREDICTION Hard
Prague Open - Prague wta
20 Jul 2025 / Q3
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Avanesyan VS Bondar PREDICTION Hard
Prague Open - Prague wta
21 Jul 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Henry Searle
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
93%
(
25 of
27)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
12%
(
5 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 6 | Games Won | 12 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:4:46 | Average Match Time | 1:4:46 |
| 62% (32/52) | 1st Serve % | 64% (27/42) |
| 69% (22/32) | 1st Serve Win % | 93% (25/27) |
| 40% (8/20) | 2nd Serve Win % | 80% (12/15) |
| 0% (0/2) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (3/6) |
| 12% (5/42) | Return Points Win % | 42% (22/52) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Searle vs Mcdonald Match Preview :
- How does their second serve performance compare? Searle wins 47.56% of points, edging slightly ahead of Mcdonald's 47.14%.
- Who performs better in return games? Recently, Searle has taken 47.83% of their opponent’s second serve points, surpassing Mcdonald's 47.14%.
- First serve return stats favor Mcdonald, who wins 26.2% compared to Searle's 24.45%.
- Under pressure, Searle demonstrates stronger breakpoint resilience, saving 64.25% compared to Mcdonald’s 51.92%.
- Overall match win rate in the past year is higher for Mcdonald at 60.56%, while Searle follows with 52.94%.
- Both players excel on hard surfaces; Mcdonald has a slight edge with 59% versus Searle’s 56% win rate.
- Mcdonald tends to face higher-ranked opponents, with their average opponent ranked at 194.69 compared to Searle's 364.75.
- In deciding sets, Mcdonald has a marginal edge, winning 45% compared to Searle's 43%.
- Mcdonald is better at converting breakpoints, with a conversion rate of 29.28% over Searle's 24.83%.
Editorial Prediction (June 15, 2025, UTC):
Both players exhibit strong second serve performances. Searle slightly outperforms in this area, albeit by a narrow margin. This closely contested facet might marginally influence the match.
Searle shows superior performance in second serve returns, yet Mcdonald compensates with better results against first serves. This suggests a balanced return game overall.
Breakpoint scenarios could be decisive, where Searle boasts greater defensive capabilities, but Mcdonald counters with more effective conversion of opportunities.
Mcdonald's overall win rate and experience against stronger opponents position him as the likely winner, but Searle's under-pressure proficiency could shift the dynamics if it becomes a factor.
Considering all statistical insights, Mcdonald is slightly favored to claim victory in this match.
Searle vs Mcdonald Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Henry Searle Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Ryan Peniston
Player
Henry Searle
65%
(
55 of
84)
1st Serve %
72%
(
68 of
95)
3
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
42 of
68)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
35%
(
29 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
95)
96
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Henry Searle
Player
Taha Baadi
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve %
67%
(
35 of
52)
10
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ethan Quinn
Player
Henry Searle
63%
(
78 of
124)
1st Serve %
61%
(
73 of
120)
13
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
6
73%
(
57 of
78)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
45 of
73)
57%
(
26 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
33%
(
41 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
52 of
120)
135
Total Points Won
109
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(11) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Duckworth
Player
Henry Searle
56%
(
57 of
101)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
99)
10
Aces
11
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
55%
(
24 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
33 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
35 of
99)
103
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Henry Searle
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
93%
(
25 of
27)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
12%
(
5 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Henry Searle
Player
Bu Yunchaokete
63%
(
52 of
83)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
80)
13
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
41 of
52)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
37 of
50)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
25 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
27 of
80)
85
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(0) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Henry Searle
62%
(
53 of
86)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
86)
9
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
0
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
21%
(
7 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
45%
(
39 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
43 of
86)
90
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Henry Searle
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Mackenzie Mcdonald Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Karen Khachanov
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
62%
(
66 of
106)
1st Serve %
67%
(
62 of
92)
11
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
51 of
66)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
42 of
62)
58%
(
23 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
30%
(
32 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
92)
109
Total Points Won
89
|
7-5 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
George Loffhagen
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
75%
(
54 of
72)
12
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
91%
(
39 of
43)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
41 of
54)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
19%
(
12 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
24 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
13
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
75
Total Points Won
53
|
2-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Gael Monfils
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
50%
(
30 of
60)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
8
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Henry Searle
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
93%
(
25 of
27)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
12%
(
5 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Aleksandar Kovacevic
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
54%
(
40 of
74)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
16 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
74)
77
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Karen Khachanov
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
59%
(
61 of
103)
1st Serve %
69%
(
75 of
108)
13
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
50 of
61)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
55 of
75)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
31 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
38 of
108)
110
Total Points Won
101
|
6-3 5-7 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Mattia Bellucci
72%
(
74 of
103)
1st Serve %
55%
(
43 of
78)
4
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
70%
(
52 of
74)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
34 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
78)
101
Total Points Won
80
|
6-1 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 50% (53/52) | Win/Loss | 56% (335/264) |
| 52% (127/119) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (806/651) |
| 51% (1228/1193) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (7235/6699) |
| 56% (22/17) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (215/151) |
| 38% (3/5) | Clay Win/Loss | 37% (23/39) |
| 53% (21/19) | Indoor Hard W/L | 58% (56/41) |
| 39% (7/11) | Grass Win/Loss | 55% (41/33) |
| 0.51 | Aces Per Game | 0.36 |
| 606 | Aces Total | 2430 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 256 | Total Double Faults | 1350 |
| 1:39:45 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 405.54 | Average Opponent Rank | 406.22 |
| 64% (4745/7462) | 1st Serve % | 63% (25876/40829) |
| 71% (3356/4745) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (18050/25876) |
| 52% (1422/2717) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (7670/14953) |
| 40% (239/596) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (1635/3874) |
| 36% (2612/7291) | Return Points Win % | 39% (16122/41542) |
| 0% (0/2) | Slam W/L | 49% (32/33) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 48% (41/44) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 80% (4/1) |
| 29% (2/5) | Main Tour W/L | 48% (83/89) |
| 47% (17/19) | Challenger W/L | 63% (134/78) |
| 57% (34/26) | Futures W/L | 68% (41/19) |
| 51% (52/102) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (311/546) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 43% (21/49) |
| 38% (18/47) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (97/195) |
| 36% (12/33) | Deciding Set Win % | 46% (83/181) |
| 82% (55/45) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (350/282) |
| 18% (55/10) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (350/68) |
| 14% (50/7) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (249/53) |
Searle vs. Mcdonald Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
