B. Yunchaokete
To Win
H. Searle
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W W W L L W LForm
L L L W L W L L L LThey have played 2 sets in total, with Searle winning 2 and Sweeny winning 0. The last match between Searle and Sweeny was at the M25 Nottingham, 06-05-2025, Round: First, Surface: Hard, with Henry Searle getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Henry Searle | 1 |
Dane Sweeny | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: M25 Nottingham(06-05-2025)
Searle | Stats | Sweeny |
---|---|---|
63% (17-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 48% (15-16) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
427 | Ranking | 570 |
389 | Highest Rank | 194 |
19 | Age | 24 |
- | Plays | R |
0 | Titles | 7 |
52% (51-48) | Career Total W/L | 54% (180-151) |
$3,970 | Career Prize Money | $346,065 |
1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
14 Jun 2025 / Q1 round
cinch Championships - London atp
14 Jun 2025 / Q1 round
cinch Championships - London atp
14 Jun 2025 / Q1 round
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-3 |
![]() ![]()
Henry Searle
Player
Dane Sweeny
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 6 |
7 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
3 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
1:26:35 | Average Match Time | 1:26:35 |
63% (35/56) | 1st Serve % | 68% (41/60) |
71% (25/35) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (22/41) |
38% (8/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 26% (5/19) |
60% (6/10) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (3/6) |
55% (33/60) | Return Points Win % | 41% (23/56) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The upcoming match between Searle and Sweeny presents a fascinating contest with both players having unique strengths.
Searle has shown better resilience under pressure with superior breakpoint saving ability and slightly more successful recent match outcomes. His performance on second serves also grants him a marginal edge in rallying scenarios.
Conversely, Sweeny's ability to return serves, especially the first serve, and his superior breakpoint conversion rate might give him the upper hand in critical points and deciding sets.
Taking all these comparisons into account, while Searle’s experience and match record suggest a slight advantage, Sweeny’s potential to clinch key points positions him as a formidable opponent. Nonetheless, Searle is potentially the more likely winner of this encounter, given his balanced strengths and consistency in recent form.
Searle vs Sweeny Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Henry Searle
62%
(
53 of
86)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
86)
9
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
0
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
21%
(
7 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
45%
(
39 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
43 of
86)
90
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Henry Searle
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Mark Lajal
Player
Henry Searle
60%
(
61 of
101)
1st Serve %
52%
(
60 of
115)
6
Aces
13
6
Double Faults
4
84%
(
51 of
61)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
43 of
60)
55%
(
22 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
28%
(
28 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
42 of
115)
115
Total Points Won
101
|
5-7 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Marc Polmans
Player
Henry Searle
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
3
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
30 of
39)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
33%
(
22 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Henry Searle
Player
Robin Catry
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
23 of
59)
55
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Henry Searle
Player
Matas Vasiliauskas
47%
(
14 of
30)
1st Serve %
48%
(
11 of
23)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
10 of
14)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
47%
(
14 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
29
Total Points Won
24
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Daniil Glinka
Player
Henry Searle
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
72)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
26 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Hyeon Chung
Player
Dane Sweeny
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
7
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
78)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Patrick Kypson
Player
Dane Sweeny
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
19 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
22 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Fabrizio Andaloro
Player
Dane Sweeny
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
85)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
32 of
85)
78
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Kaichi Uchida
Player
Dane Sweeny
48%
(
55 of
115)
1st Serve %
67%
(
62 of
92)
9
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
5
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
47 of
62)
52%
(
31 of
60)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
46 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
92)
103
Total Points Won
104
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Dane Sweeny
Player
Masamichi Imamura
68%
(
65 of
95)
1st Serve %
65%
(
62 of
95)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
5 of
5)
43%
(
41 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
45 of
95)
99
Total Points Won
91
|
4-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Martin Damm
Player
Dane Sweeny
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
96%
(
24 of
25)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Henry Searle
Player
Dane Sweeny
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
52% (51/48) | Win/Loss | 54% (180/151) |
52% (120/110) | Sets Win/Loss | 52% (403/374) |
51% (1156/1108) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (3747/3587) |
56% (22/17) | Hard Win/Loss | 57% (147/109) |
38% (3/5) | Clay Win/Loss | 44% (17/22) |
53% (21/19) | Indoor Hard W/L | 37% (7/12) |
42% (5/7) | Grass Win/Loss | 53% (9/8) |
0.5 | Aces Per Game | 0.2 |
555 | Aces Total | 719 |
0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.29 |
244 | Total Double Faults | 1042 |
1:40:52 | Average Match Time | 1:38:56 |
415.72 | Average Opponent Rank | 418.85 |
63% (4423/6971) | 1st Serve % | 63% (13680/21791) |
71% (3133/4423) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (8947/13680) |
53% (1338/2548) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (4099/8111) |
41% (227/554) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (950/2213) |
36% (2450/6808) | Return Points Win % | 40% (8659/21395) |
0% (0/1) | Slam W/L | 47% (7/8) |
0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 60% (3/2) |
25% (1/3) | Main Tour W/L | 43% (3/4) |
47% (16/18) | Challenger W/L | 41% (49/71) |
57% (34/26) | Futures W/L | 64% (118/66) |
52% (50/97) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (177/327) |
0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
36% (16/44) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (41/87) |
39% (12/31) | Deciding Set Win % | 62% (69/112) |
84% (51/43) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (156/137) |
16% (51/8) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (156/19) |
15% (48/7) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (175/43) |