Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Henry Patten vs Radu Mihai Papoe Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Patten vs Papoe analysis and find out who is favored!
Henry Patten vs Radu Mihai Papoe Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Patten has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Papoe has won 58.11%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Patten, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Papoe has won 59.26%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 36.57% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Patten has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Papoe has saved 57.14% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Patten has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Papoe winning 76.32% (W/L 29/ 9) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Patten has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 46/ 24), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Papoe has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 72% (W/L 23/ 9), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 66/ 34).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Patten winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Patten winning 2 and Papoe winning 0. The last match between Patten and Papoe was at the M15 Ithaca, 08-10-2021, Quarterfinals, I.hard with Henry Patten getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:14:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Patten and Papoe have played a deciding set 0 times, with Patten winning 0 times and Papoe 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Patten winning 0, and Papoe 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Patten has played against opponents with an average rank of while Papoe has played against players with an average rank of 177.97.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Patten has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Papoe has won 88% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Patten has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Papoe has converted 49.15% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Patten 1 - 0 Papoe
784
Rank
462
High
27
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
545
Rank
509
High
21
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
64% (65-37)
Career Total W/L
68% (94-45)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
75% (3-1)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Henry Patten | Radu Mihai Papoe |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:14:0 | 1:14:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (38/56) | 72% (39/54) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 76% (29/38) | 46% (18/39) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (9/18) | 60% (9/15) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (4/10) | 0% (0/2) |
| Return Points W% | 50% (27/54) | 32% (18/56) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats 
Henry Patten
Player
Radu Mihai Papoe
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve %
72%
(
39 of
54)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Henry Patten | Radu Mihai Papoe |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 75% (3/1) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 67% (6/3) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 59% (46/32) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 75% (3/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.21 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 8 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:36:30 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 71% (169/239) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 68% (115/169) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 61% (43/70) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 62% (13/21) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 42% (104/247) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 75% (3/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 75% (3/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
Henry Patten Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Juncheng Shang
Player
Henry Patten
71%
(
66 of
93)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
87)
5
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
8
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
40%
(
37 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
87)
93
Total Points Won
87
|
7-5 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Henry Patten
Player
James Kent Trotter
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
5
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
18 of
53)
67
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Henry Patten
Player
Shunsuke Mitsui
54%
(
50 of
93)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
93)
3
Aces
4
10
Double Faults
5
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
42%
(
18 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
46%
(
43 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
93)
95
Total Points Won
91
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aidan Mayo
Player
Henry Patten
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Henry Patten
Player
Kyle Seelig
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
68%
(
48 of
71)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Li Tu
Player
Henry Patten
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
62)
9
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
7
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
23 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Millen Hurrion
Player
Henry Patten
68%
(
84 of
124)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
87)
8
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
61%
(
51 of
84)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
43%
(
53 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
87)
105
Total Points Won
106
|
3-6 7-6(9) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Toby Samuel
Player
Henry Patten
68%
(
77 of
114)
1st Serve %
60%
(
60 of
100)
15
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
51 of
77)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
39%
(
45 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
38 of
100)
107
Total Points Won
107
|
6-4 6-7(8) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Henry Patten
Player
Stuart Parker
57%
(
63 of
110)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
86)
4
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
0
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
55%
(
26 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
35%
(
39 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
26 of
86)
97
Total Points Won
99
|
6-3 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Henry Patten
Player
Alastair Gray
62%
(
58 of
93)
1st Serve %
64%
(
56 of
87)
4
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
2
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
45 of
56)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
31%
(
29 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
29 of
87)
93
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Radu Mihai Papoe Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Tristan Mccormick
Player
Radu Mihai Papoe
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
11
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Ozan Baris
70%
(
73 of
104)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
91)
3
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
43 of
57)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
38%
(
40 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
32 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
99
|
1-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Henrik Wiersholm
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
2
Aces
4
-
Double Faults
-
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
52
Total Points Won
18
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Radu Mihai Papoe
53%
(
36 of
68)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
1
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
3
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
76
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Preston Stearns
46%
(
18 of
39)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
72%
(
13 of
18)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Connor Bruce
64%
(
59 of
92)
1st Serve %
55%
(
52 of
94)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
36%
(
8 of
22)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
36 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
52 of
94)
108
Total Points Won
78
|
6-7(3) 6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Liam Draxl
72%
(
54 of
75)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Perry Gregg
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
74%
(
56 of
76)
0
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
6-1 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Angel Diaz Jalil
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
7
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Patten Vs Papoe Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
