Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Henry Craig vs Nikala Scholtz Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Craig vs Scholtz analysis and find out who is favored!
Henry Craig vs Nikala Scholtz Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Craig has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Scholtz has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Craig, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Scholtz has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Craig has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Scholtz has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Craig has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Scholtz winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Craig has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 98/ 56), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 2/ 6). Scholtz has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 213/ 104), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 17% (W/L 1/ 5).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Craig winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Craig winning 3 and Scholtz winning 2. The last match between Craig and Scholtz was at the USA F10 (Little Rock), 14-04-2018, Quarterfinals, Hard with Nikala Scholtz getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:34:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Craig and Scholtz have played a deciding set 0 times, with Craig winning 0 times and Scholtz 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Craig winning 1, and Scholtz 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Craig has played against opponents with an average rank of while Scholtz has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Craig has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Scholtz has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Craig has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Scholtz has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Craig 1 - 1 Scholtz
Ret.
Rank
589
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
320
High
33
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
Form
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
61% (103-65)
Career Total W/L
65% (217-119)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$4,340
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Henry Craig | Nikala Scholtz |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 2 |
| Games Won | 30 | 27 |
| Aces (Total) | 9 | 17 |
| DFs (Total) | 8 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:34:30 | 2:34:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (97/165) | 68% (135/198) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (72/97) | 70% (94/135) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 60% (42/70) | 52% (33/64) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 31% (5/16) | 27% (3/11) |
| Return Points W% | 36% (72/199) | 32% (53/167) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 7-6(3) 6-5 ret. |
Stats 
Nikala Scholtz
Player
Henry Craig
73%
(
86 of
118)
1st Serve %
67%
(
67 of
100)
10
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
61 of
86)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
48 of
67)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
34%
(
41 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
34 of
102)
112
Total Points Won
109
|
||||
| 6-4 7-6(1) |
Stats
Henry Craig
Player
Nikala Scholtz
46%
(
30 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
49 of
80)
3
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
3
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
19 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Henry Craig | Nikala Scholtz |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Henry Craig Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Frederico Gil
Player
Henry Craig
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
17%
(
5 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
53
Total Points Won
20
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Henry Craig
Player
Sean Hodkin
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
49%
(
38 of
78)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
14
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
14 of
40)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nuno Borges
Player
Henry Craig
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
53%
(
46 of
87)
10
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
14 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
87)
81
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Henry Craig
Player
Dennis Uspensky
49%
(
24 of
49)
1st Serve %
43%
(
22 of
51)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
16 of
22)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Nuno Borges
Player
Henry Craig
79%
(
52 of
66)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
61)
9
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
76
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Henry Craig
Player
Erik Crepaldi
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Henry Craig
Player
Edoardo Graziani
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
52%
(
23 of
44)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Henry Craig
Player
Terence Das
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
64%
(
21 of
33)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
12)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
55
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michail Pervolarakis
Player
Henry Craig
58%
(
59 of
102)
1st Serve %
64%
(
74 of
116)
8
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
49 of
74)
60%
(
26 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
31 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
41 of
116)
112
Total Points Won
106
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Henry Craig
Player
Andres Artunedo Martinavarr
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve %
64%
(
50 of
78)
5
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
5
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
28 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
78)
78
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
view more
Nikala Scholtz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Maciej Smola
Player
Nikala Scholtz
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
42 of
68)
7
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
2
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nikala Scholtz
Player
Connor Farren
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
79)
14
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
5
88%
(
35 of
40)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
79)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nikala Scholtz
Player
Patrick Foley
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
49%
(
28 of
57)
8
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Toby Martin
Player
Nikala Scholtz
64%
(
54 of
84)
1st Serve %
58%
(
59 of
102)
5
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
6
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
28 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
43 of
102)
99
Total Points Won
87
|
6-1 6-7(0) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nikala Scholtz
Player
Joshua Luck
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
82%
(
54 of
66)
8
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
24 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jean Thirouin
Player
Nikala Scholtz
64%
(
56 of
87)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
1
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
5
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
28 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
96
Total Points Won
74
|
6-1 6-7(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emilio Gomez
Player
Nikala Scholtz
53%
(
31 of
58)
1st Serve %
79%
(
37 of
47)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Trevor Allen Johnson
Player
Nikala Scholtz
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
9
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
6
85%
(
34 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
21%
(
12 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
70)
75
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nikala Scholtz
Player
Dusty H. Boyer
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Craig Vs Scholtz Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
