Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Henri Laaksonen vs Andre Ghem Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Laaksonen vs Ghem analysis and find out who is favored!
Henri Laaksonen vs Andre Ghem Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Laaksonen has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Ghem has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Laaksonen, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ghem has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Laaksonen has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ghem has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Laaksonen has won 33.33% of matches played (W/L 9/ 18), with Ghem winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Laaksonen has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 123/ 87), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 15% (W/L 2/ 11). Ghem has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 354/ 267), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 17% (W/L 1/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Laaksonen has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 36% of matches (W/L 9/ 16), where as Ghem has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Laaksonen winning 1 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Laaksonen winning 2 and Ghem winning 5. The last match between Laaksonen and Ghem was at the French Open - Paris, 16-05-2016, Q1 round, Clay with Henri Laaksonen getting the victory 1100037508.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:30:49.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Laaksonen and Ghem have played a deciding set 1 times, with Laaksonen winning 1 times and Ghem 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Laaksonen winning 1, and Ghem 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Laaksonen has played against opponents with an average rank of 318.15 while Ghem has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Laaksonen has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ghem has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Laaksonen has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ghem has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Laaksonen 1 - 2 Ghem
658
Rank
84
High
32
Age
R
Plays
1
Total2
0
Hard0
1
Clay2
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
118
High
41
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
Form
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
53% (443-387)
Career Total W/L
56% (451-351)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$1,218,340
Career Prize Money
$71,898
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Henri Laaksonen | Andre Ghem |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 5 |
| Games Won | 28 | 39 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 7 |
| DFs (Total) | 8 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:30:49 | 1:30:49 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (134/203) | 61% (141/232) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 63% (85/134) | 64% (90/141) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 48% (33/69) | 57% (52/91) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 32% (7/22) | 60% (12/20) |
| Return Points W% | 39% (90/232) | 42% (85/203) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 67% (2/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(5) 6-7(5) 6-2 |
Stats 
Henri Laaksonen
Player
Andre Ghem
76%
(
75 of
99)
1st Serve %
56%
(
69 of
123)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
52 of
75)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
41 of
69)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
30%
(
30 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
52 of
123)
121
Total Points Won
101
|
||||
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats
Andre Ghem
Player
Henri Laaksonen
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
0
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
||||
| 6-3 6-0 |
Stats
Andre Ghem
Player
Henri Laaksonen
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
49%
(
20 of
41)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Henri Laaksonen | Andre Ghem |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Henri Laaksonen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Henri Laaksonen
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve %
45%
(
18 of
40)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
13 of
18)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
9 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
44
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Player
Henri Laaksonen
59%
(
44 of
74)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
89)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
89)
83
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Enrico Dalla Valle
Player
Henri Laaksonen
73%
(
61 of
84)
1st Serve %
59%
(
70 of
119)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
79%
(
48 of
61)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
43 of
70)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
23 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
51 of
119)
112
Total Points Won
91
|
6-7(5) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Henri Laaksonen
Player
Goncalo Falcao
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve %
53%
(
23 of
43)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
67%
(
14 of
21)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
9 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
52
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Joao Domingues
Player
Henri Laaksonen
45%
(
30 of
66)
1st Serve %
45%
(
40 of
89)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
64%
(
23 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
89)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Moez Echargui
Player
Henri Laaksonen
56%
(
48 of
86)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
0
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
44%
(
38 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
82
Total Points Won
74
|
2-6 6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Henri Laaksonen
Player
Kirill Kivattsev
52%
(
44 of
85)
1st Serve %
55%
(
48 of
87)
5
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
38%
(
32 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
87)
94
Total Points Won
78
|
6-3 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Henri Laaksonen
Player
Jesse Flores
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve %
43%
(
23 of
53)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Henri Laaksonen
67%
(
8 of
12)
1st Serve %
40%
(
8 of
20)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
6 of
8)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
50%
(
2 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
21
Total Points Won
11
|
5-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Henri Laaksonen
Player
Jeremy Jahn
49%
(
61 of
125)
1st Serve %
63%
(
82 of
130)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
6
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
49 of
82)
42%
(
27 of
64)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
42%
(
52 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
55 of
130)
128
Total Points Won
127
|
6-7(5) 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Andre Ghem Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Duckhee Lee
Player
Andre Ghem
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
0
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
30%
(
6 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
42%
(
23 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Moura Monteiro
Player
Andre Ghem
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
53%
(
19 of
36)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
50
Total Points Won
26
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andre Ghem
Player
Fabiano De Paula
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
70%
(
32 of
46)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andre Ghem
Player
Claudio Kligerman
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve %
46%
(
19 of
41)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
55
Total Points Won
20
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Andre Ghem
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
2
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
1
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bradley Mousley
Player
Andre Ghem
71%
(
56 of
79)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
87)
8
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
2
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
29%
(
23 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
29 of
87)
85
Total Points Won
81
|
2-6 7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gastao Elias
Player
Andre Ghem
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve %
59%
(
49 of
83)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
68%
(
21 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
20 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
83)
88
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andre Ghem
Player
Hernan Casanova
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
82%
(
59 of
72)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
9 of
13)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
78
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andre Ghem
Player
Christian Oliveira
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
10 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Laaksonen Vs Ghem Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
