Hazem Naow vs Tom Kocevar-Desman Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Naow vs Kocevar-Desman analysis and find out who is favored!
Hazem Naow vs Tom Kocevar-Desman Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Naow has won 50.79% of points on his second serve, while Kocevar-Desman has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Naow, in recent form, has won 56.03% of his opponent's second serve points, while Kocevar-Desman has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.36% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Naow has saved 61.98% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kocevar-Desman has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Naow has won 68.67% of matches played (W/L 57/ 26), with Kocevar-Desman winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Naow has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 71% (W/L 65/ 27), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 54/ 36). Kocevar-Desman has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 98/ 68), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 35% (W/L 9/ 17).
- Player level: In the last year, Naow has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 71.43% of matches (W/L 40/ 16), where as Kocevar-Desman has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Naow winning 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Naow winning 2 and Kocevar-Desman winning 2. The last match between Naow and Kocevar-Desman was at the M15 Troisdorf, 10-05-2021, Q2 round, Clay with Tom Kocevar-Desman getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Naow and Kocevar-Desman have played a deciding set 0 times, with Naow winning 0 times and Kocevar-Desman 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Naow winning 0, and Kocevar-Desman 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Naow has played against opponents with an average rank of 179.64 while Kocevar-Desman has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Naow has won 62% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kocevar-Desman has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Naow has converted 44.85% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kocevar-Desman has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Naow 1 - 1 Kocevar-Desman
4
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
4
Minor
341
Rank
323
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
890
Rank
349
High
33
Age
R
Plays
5
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
5
Minor
Form
66% (151-78)
Career Total W/L
55% (239-197)
76% (26-8)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$675
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Naow VS Kocevar-Desman H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Hazem Naow | Tom Kocevar-Desman |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
Games Won | 19 | 17 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Naow VS Kocevar-Desman H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-4 | |||||
6-4 6-1 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Hazem Naow | Tom Kocevar-Desman |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 76% (26/8) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 70% (54/23) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 57% (407/308) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 78% (7/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 76% (19/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.21 | 0 |
Aces Total | 75 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.35 | 0 |
DFs Total | 123 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:38:21 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 229.18 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 63% (1484/2347) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 70% (1043/1484) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 50% (429/863) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 44% (119/273) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 43% (999/2323) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 78% (14/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 80% (12/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 76% (26/34) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 78% (7/9) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (22/22) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (22/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 33% (12/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Hazem Naow Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Henri Squire
Player
Hazem Naow
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Hazem Naow
66%
(
66 of
100)
1st Serve %
67%
(
51 of
76)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
39%
(
39 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
76)
89
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Hazem Naow
Player
Mae Malige
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
36%
(
15 of
42)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Hazem Naow
Player
Dario Huber
63%
(
64 of
102)
1st Serve %
56%
(
53 of
95)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
6
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
14 of
42)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
95)
106
Total Points Won
91
|
4-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Gregoire Barrere
Player
Hazem Naow
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
74%
(
32 of
43)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
50
Total Points Won
42
|
7-5 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Hazem Naow
Player
Michael Geerts
66%
(
69 of
105)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
8
Aces
11
7
Double Faults
2
75%
(
52 of
69)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
46 of
64)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
33%
(
35 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
35 of
97)
105
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Hazem Naow
Player
Eliakim Coulibaly
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
75%
(
41 of
55)
4
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
1
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Hazem Naow
Player
Cyril Vandermeersch
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
0
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Lucas Pouille
Player
Hazem Naow
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
13
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Hazem Naow
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
55%
(
72 of
130)
1st Serve %
72%
(
73 of
102)
4
Aces
16
6
Double Faults
0
72%
(
52 of
72)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
49 of
73)
53%
(
31 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
36%
(
47 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
37 of
102)
120
Total Points Won
112
|
7-6(2) 6-7(3) 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Tom Kocevar-Desman Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
David Poljak
Player
Tom Kocevar-Desman
62%
(
48 of
78)
1st Serve %
53%
(
39 of
74)
13
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
4
92%
(
44 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
29%
(
23 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
69
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Tom Kocevar-Desman
Player
Simonas Zukauskas
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
3
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
8
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
60
|
4-6 6-1 10-7 | H2H | ||
QF |
Hanwen Li
Player
Tom Kocevar-Desman
68%
(
65 of
95)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
38%
(
36 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
92
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Tom Kocevar-Desman
Player
Digvijaypratap Singh
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
30 of
35)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
22%
(
13 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tom Kocevar-Desman
Player
Zura Tkemaladze
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Oscar Moraing
Player
Tom Kocevar-Desman
52%
(
34 of
65)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
6
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Tom Kocevar-Desman
Player
Alexis Canter
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
72%
(
54 of
75)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tom Kocevar-Desman
Player
Zsombor Velcz
54%
(
25 of
46)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
61
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Savva Polukhin
Player
Tom Kocevar-Desman
49%
(
25 of
51)
1st Serve %
48%
(
21 of
44)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
60%
(
15 of
25)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tom Kocevar-Desman
Player
Aristotelis Thanos
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H |
view more