Harry Wendelken vs Tim Handel Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

When assessing the second serve performance in the past six months, Wendelken has claimed 42.73% of the points, surpassing Handel's 40.17% performance. This metric often acts as a reliable indicator for predicting match outcomes. Adjustments in statistics such as these are known to directly influence the favorite predictions in head-to-head matchups.

In the context of return game metrics, Wendelken has secured 40.22% of points on his opponent's second serves, trailing behind Handel, who achieved a higher 49.25%. When addressing first serve returns, Wendelken's 26.42% conversion rate slightly lags behind Handel's 30%. Variations in first serve return stats are integral when determining competitive edges in predictions.

Analyzing breakpoints, Wendelken showed an impressive ability to save 55.72% of them, compared to Handel's 51.21%. Such figures serve as a crucial insight for live-match betting. When examining breakpoint opportunities, Wendelken managed to convert 34.93%, just above Handel’s conversion rate of 34.16% when trying to break an opponent's serve.

A look at their match records over the last year shows that Wendelken has emerged victorious in 53.13% of the matches (W/L 34/30), while Handel holds a win ratio of 50.91% (W/L 28/27). Considering these factors, the overall prediction leans towards favoring Wendelken slightly.

Wendelken has demonstrated a stronger career win percentage on indoor hard surfaces at 58% (W/L 62/45), whereas Grass has proven to be his least favorable surface at 38% (W/L 6/10). On the contrary, Handel shines on Clay courts with a 63% win rate (W/L 134/79) and finds indoor hard surfaces challenging with a 42% win percentage (W/L 14/19).

Both players mainly compete in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, with Wendelken winning 53.57% (W/L 30/26) of his matches, while Handel marginally exceeds with a win rate of 54.35% (W/L 25/21). This comparison is significant, proving both players’ ability to maintain performance across different tournament levels.

Regarding opponent quality, Wendelken has faced adversaries with an average ranking of 436.28, significantly different from Handel’s opponents, who have averaged a higher rank of 151.35 over the past year. Such discrepancies can impact match predictions substantially.

Regarding deciding sets over the last year, both players share an even record, winning 50% of these encounters. Such parity in performance reflects the unpredictability of such crucial moments in matches.

Collectively, based on these statistics, Wendelken seems to have a slight advantage in several categories, suggesting he could have a higher chance of securing a win in their upcoming match.