Harry Roberts vs Ethan Cook Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W L L L L L
Form
L L W L W W L L W LHead-To-Head: Roberts 0 - 1 Cook
They have played 2 sets in total, with Roberts winning 0 and Cook winning 2. The last match between Roberts and Cook was at the M25 Burnie, 16-02-2025, Q1 round, Hard with Ethan Cook getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Harry Roberts | 0 |
| Ethan Cook | 1 |
M25 Burnie(16-02-2025)
6
2
6
1
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Eala VS Swiatek PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
26 Mar 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-1 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 3 | Games Won | 12 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Harry Roberts Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 4-6 7-6(3) 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 2-6 6-1 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats 
Moerani Bouzige
Player
Harry Roberts
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Harry Roberts
Player
Charlie Pade
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
3
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
46%
(
32 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
68
|
2-6 6-4 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Harry Roberts
Player
Adrian Arcon
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
54%
(
34 of
63)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
76
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 3-6 6-1 10-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Joshua Charlton
Player
Harry Roberts
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
56%
(
23 of
41)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 3-6 7-6(3) 10-7 | H2H | |||
view more
Ethan Cook Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Ethan Cook
74%
(
48 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ethan Cook
Player
Seongbin Sim
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
83%
(
43 of
52)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thomas Braithwaite
Player
Ethan Cook
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
49%
(
34 of
70)
10
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
8
85%
(
39 of
46)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
26 of
34)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
28%
(
18 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cruz Hewitt
Player
Ethan Cook
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
48 of
76)
4
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
70
|
2-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ethan Cook
Player
Yuichiro Inui
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
39%
(
21 of
54)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Sam Young-Mathers
Player
Ethan Cook
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
27 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 4-6 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Mikal Statham
Player
Ethan Cook
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
53 of
80)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
42%
(
24 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
80)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matt Kuhar
Player
Ethan Cook
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
31 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
70
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 41% (7/10) | Win/Loss | 46% (58/69) |
| 41% (17/24) | Sets Win/Loss | 47% (137/154) |
| 47% (186/208) | Games Win/Loss | 49% (1404/1433) |
| 50% (7/7) | Hard Win/Loss | 49% (51/53) |
| 0% (0/1) | Clay Win/Loss | 33% (5/10) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 25% (2/6) |
| 0 | Aces Per Game | 0.17 |
| 0 | Aces Total | 232 |
| 0.1 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.12 |
| 19 | Total Double Faults | 169 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 75.94 | Average Opponent Rank | 199.71 |
| 63% (186/294) | 1st Serve % | 64% (3013/4681) |
| 58% (108/186) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (1978/3013) |
| 41% (44/108) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (833/1668) |
| 36% (12/33) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (156/397) |
| 43% (120/282) | Return Points Win % | 37% (1660/4546) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 41% (7/10) | Futures W/L | 46% (58/68) |
| 41% (7/17) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 46% (58/127) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (2/4) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 39% (13/33) |
| 57% (4/7) | Deciding Set Win % | 43% (16/37) |
| 50% (6/3) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (62/50) |
| 50% (6/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (62/12) |
| 36% (11/4) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 12% (65/8) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
