Prediction of Harriet Dart [110th] vs Louisa Chirico [154th] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W L L L L L
Form
W W W L L W W W L LHead-2-Head: Dart 1 - 1 Chirico
They have played 4 sets in total, with Dart winning 3 and Chirico winning 1. The last match between Dart and Chirico was at the W75 Porto, 08-03-2025, Semifinals, I.hard with Harriet Dart getting the victory 6-7(6) 7-6(2) 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Harriet Dart | 1 |
| Louisa Chirico | 1 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(6) 7-6(2) 6-4 |
Stats 
Harriet Dart
Player
Louisa Chirico
57%
(
70 of
123)
1st Serve %
62%
(
85 of
137)
8
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
10
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
52 of
85)
49%
(
26 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
19 of
52)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
42%
(
52 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
66 of
137)
137
Total Points Won
123
|
||||
| 4-6 6-6 ret. |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Harriet Dart
61%
(
50 of
82)
1st Serve %
56%
(
51 of
91)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
38%
(
12 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
43%
(
35 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
91)
86
Total Points Won
87
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 31 | Games Won | 27 |
| 10 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 12 | Total Double Faults | 15 |
| 2:39:23 | Average Match Time | 2:39:23 |
| 57% (121/214) | 1st Serve % | 62% (135/219) |
| 60% (73/121) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (87/135) |
| 54% (50/93) | 2nd Serve Win % | 37% (31/84) |
| 33% (10/30) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 31% (8/26) |
| 46% (101/219) | Return Points Win % | 43% (91/214) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Harriet Dart vs Louisa Chirico Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Dart 1 - 1 Chirico
Editorial Prediction:
How do Dart and Chirico fare when it comes to second serve points? Over the past six months, Dart has managed to win 37.66% of points on their second serve. In contrast, Chirico has fared slightly better, capturing 40.35% of her second serve points. This subtle edge can often influence match prediction decisions, especially when analyzing upcoming encounters.
Return game statistics prove equally enlightening. Looking at recent performances, Dart has won 50.37% of her opponent's second serve points, while Chirico remains marginally more successful at 51.46%. As for their ability to counter first serve returns, the stats stand close with Dart at 34.35% and Chirico at 34.11%. These figures offer a clearer insight into who might seize dominance during their head-to-head matchup.
The aspect of saving breakpoints adds another layer to the analysis. Dart has successfully saved 50% of breakpoints faced, positioning her with a slight advantage over Chirico, who has saved 44.66% of breakpoints. This metric is particularly useful for those placing in-game bets, where each breakpoint can significantly influence match dynamics.
Surveying their overall performance landscape over the past year, Dart's win rate lies at 45.65% (21/25), whereas Chirico boasts a 54.41% success rate (37/31). This broader snapshot provides a holistic view of their recent form, offering clues about who might emerge victorious in this showdown.
When we examine their favored playing surfaces, it's apparent Dart thrives on indoor hard courts with a winning percentage of 59% (67/47). Her performance dips on clay, where she holds a 45% win rate. Chirico, conversely, showcases her prowess on clay with a striking 61% win rate (165/104), yet she struggles on grass, claiming only 38% of matches.
Analyzing the level of competition, Dart predominantly competes in Masters series tournaments, securing victories in 42.86% of her matches (6/8). Chirico, on the other hand, has been more active in Challengers and ITF events, achieving a better 59.26% win rate (32/22). The event level plays a crucial role in predicting potential outcomes, as the competition faced can vary drastically.
Regarding their direct confrontations, they've crossed paths once before, splitting sets with Dart winning one and Chirico none, as the match at the National Bank Open - Toronto concluded with Chirico's victory due to Dart's retirement (4-6, 6-6 ret.). Their clash lasted an average duration of 2 hours and 4 minutes, adding intensity to their encounters. In deciding sets, Dart hasn't secured a win against Chirico, losing their singular deciding set face-off.
Their experience in tiebreak situations remains unexplored, as neither has secured a tiebreak win against the other. Dart's average opponent rank stands at 135.91, contrasting with Chirico's of 291.41, influencing their overall competitive exposure. Should this clash extend to a deciding set, historical performance suggests Dart might have the upper hand, having won 50% of these scenarios recently, whereas Chirico has only won 40%.
Considering recent form in converting breakpoints, Dart leads at 42.86%, whereas Chirico trails with a conversion rate of 38.32%. These figures provide useful insights for in-game betting, underscoring the competitive edge one player might hold over the other in critical moments.
Given these factors, while the stats suggest Chirico holds a slight edge in overall recent form and clay prowess, Dart's saving ability during pivotal moments might level the playing field. Hence, with all assessed elements, the scales tip toward a razor-thin prediction favoring Chirico, contingent on her ability to leverage superior return stats and previous match experience.
Harriet Dart Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Lois Boisson
Player
Harriet Dart
79%
(
45 of
57)
1st Serve %
52%
(
22 of
42)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
25%
(
3 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Varvara Gracheva
Player
Harriet Dart
64%
(
49 of
76)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
82
Total Points Won
65
|
6-1 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | n/p | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jaqueline Cristian
Player
Harriet Dart
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
33%
(
7 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Harriet Dart
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
3
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
2
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
49%
(
38 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
71
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Harriet Dart
Player
Daria Saville
55%
(
58 of
106)
1st Serve %
58%
(
44 of
76)
2
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
7
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
33%
(
16 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
48%
(
51 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
41 of
76)
96
Total Points Won
86
|
2-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Victoria Mboko
Player
Harriet Dart
68%
(
13 of
19)
1st Serve %
71%
(
10 of
14)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
54%
(
7 of
13)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
33%
(
2 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
53%
(
10 of
19)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
18
Total Points Won
15
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Harriet Dart
Player
Louisa Chirico
57%
(
70 of
123)
1st Serve %
62%
(
85 of
137)
8
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
10
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
52 of
85)
49%
(
26 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
19 of
52)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
42%
(
52 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
66 of
137)
137
Total Points Won
123
|
6-7(6) 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Harriet Dart
Player
Emeline Dartron
50%
(
7 of
14)
1st Serve %
65%
(
11 of
17)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
5 of
7)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
12 of
17)
22
Total Points Won
9
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Harriet Dart
Player
Tyra Caterina Grant
71%
(
5 of
7)
1st Serve %
70%
(
7 of
10)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
100%
(
5 of
5)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
50%
(
1 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Rtn Points Won
80%
(
8 of
10)
14
Total Points Won
3
|
3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Louisa Chirico Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
Player
Louisa Chirico
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Louisa Chirico
74%
(
49 of
66)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
29%
(
5 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
28 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Erika Andreeva
66%
(
57 of
87)
1st Serve %
60%
(
54 of
90)
2
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
3
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
40 of
54)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
36 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson
64%
(
70 of
109)
1st Serve %
75%
(
82 of
109)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
48 of
82)
38%
(
15 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
42%
(
46 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
49 of
109)
112
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(4) 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Ana Konjuh
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve %
49%
(
36 of
73)
2
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
6
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ysaline Bonaventure
Player
Louisa Chirico
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
11 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
42
Total Points Won
32
|
6-4 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Harriet Dart
Player
Louisa Chirico
57%
(
70 of
123)
1st Serve %
62%
(
85 of
137)
8
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
10
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
52 of
85)
49%
(
26 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
19 of
52)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
42%
(
52 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
66 of
137)
137
Total Points Won
123
|
6-7(6) 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Lucrezia Stefanini
69%
(
69 of
100)
1st Serve %
74%
(
89 of
121)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
51%
(
35 of
69)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
44 of
89)
29%
(
9 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
56%
(
56 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
64 of
121)
108
Total Points Won
113
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Mona Barthel
73%
(
72 of
99)
1st Serve %
46%
(
41 of
90)
3
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
12
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
42%
(
42 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
90)
96
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Taylah Preston
0%
(
0 of
0)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
0
Aces
-
10
Double Faults
6
0%
(
0 of
0)
1st Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
43)
0%
(
9 of
0)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
28)
0%
(
7 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
0%
(
-9 of
0)
Rtn Points Won
100%
(
71 of
71)
0
Total Points Won
59
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (357/283) | Win/Loss | 56% (329/261) |
| 55% (808/674) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (738/631) |
| 52% (7048/6441) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (6548/6163) |
| 0.14 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
| 915 | Aces Total | 878 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.33 |
| 1749 | Total Double Faults | 2043 |
| 1:16:1 | Average Match Time | 1:13:15 |
| 433.61 | Average Opponent Rank | 458.89 |
| 55% (18229/33236) | 1st Serve % | 59% (18898/31925) |
| 64% (11618/18229) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (11657/18898) |
| 46% (6847/15007) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (5796/13025) |
| 48% (2026/4202) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1836/3848) |
| 46% (15518/33741) | Return Points Win % | 45% (14008/31010) |
| 56% (352/628) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (319/580) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (76/146) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (84/149) |
| 55% (117/213) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (108/200) |
| 83% (353/292) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (317/267) |
| 17% (353/61) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (317/50) |
| 23% (286/66) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (273/59) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
