Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Harriet Dart vs Jamie Loeb Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Dart vs Loeb analysis and find out who is favored!
Harriet Dart vs Jamie Loeb Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Dart has won 47.57% of points on his second serve, while Loeb has won 47.87%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Dart, in recent form, has won 57.39% of his opponent's second serve points, while Loeb has won 55.26%. The same stats for first serve returns are 43.41% and 38.9% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Dart has saved 55.56% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Loeb has saved 54.85% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Dart has won 63.41% of matches played (W/L 52/ 30), with Loeb winning 50% (W/L 30/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Dart has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 199/ 135), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 47% (W/L 39/ 44). Loeb has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 33/ 22), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 8/ 16).
- Player level: In the last year, Dart has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 63.41% of matches (W/L 26/ 15), where as Loeb has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50.88% of matches (W/L 29/ 28). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Dart winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Dart winning 2 and Loeb winning 0. The last match between Dart and Loeb was at the U.S. Open - New York, 20-08-2019, Q1 round, Hard with Harriet Dart getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:34:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Dart and Loeb have played a deciding set 0 times, with Dart winning 0 times and Loeb 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Dart winning 1, and Loeb 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Dart has played against opponents with an average rank of 193.3 while Loeb has played against players with an average rank of 289.1.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Dart has won 58% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Loeb has won 59% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Dart has converted 50.93% of breakpoint opportunities, and Loeb has converted 47.53% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Dart 1 - 0 Loeb
86
Rank
84
High
27
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
289
Rank
132
High
29
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
Form
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
57% (338-256)
Career Total W/L
55% (294-242)
60% (15-10)
YTD W/L
61% (14-9)
$1,192,714
Career Prize Money
$219,866
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Harriet Dart | Jamie Loeb |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:34:0 | 1:34:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 49% (33/68) | 59% (44/75) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 76% (25/33) | 68% (30/44) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 51% (18/35) | 26% (8/31) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 36% (4/11) | 33% (2/6) |
| Return Points W% | 49% (37/75) | 37% (25/68) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 7-6(3) |
Stats 
Harriet Dart
Player
Jamie Loeb
49%
(
33 of
68)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
8 of
31)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
63
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Harriet Dart | Jamie Loeb |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 60% (15/10) | 61% (14/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 57% (34/26) | 59% (32/22) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (296/270) | 55% (272/222) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 58% (7/5) | 80% (8/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 63% (5/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 63% (5/3) | 20% (1/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.15 | 0.3 |
| Aces Total | 42 | 73 |
| DFs per game | 0.52 | 0.29 |
| DFs Total | 143 | 70 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:48:38 | 1:42:18 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 219.32 | 344.04 |
| 1st Serve % | 53% (1002/1878) | 55% (855/1546) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (641/1002) | 68% (579/855) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (397/876) | 50% (343/690) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (118/242) | 48% (93/195) |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (893/1889) | 45% (725/1594) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 71% (5/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (5/5) | 61% (14/9) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (15/25) | 64% (14/22) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 63% (5/8) | 43% (3/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (6/10) | 57% (4/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 79% (14/11) | 92% (13/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 21% (14/3) | 8% (13/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 36% (11/4) | 20% (10/2) |
Harriet Dart Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Harriet Dart
Player
Maria Timofeeva
55%
(
53 of
96)
1st Serve %
56%
(
60 of
108)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
8
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
44%
(
19 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
46%
(
44 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
55 of
108)
107
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Harriet Dart
Player
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
47%
(
39 of
83)
1st Serve %
71%
(
76 of
107)
0
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
10
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
41 of
76)
32%
(
14 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
55%
(
46 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
56 of
107)
93
Total Points Won
97
|
0-6 6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matilde Jorge
Player
Harriet Dart
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
43%
(
23 of
53)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
9
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Harriet Dart
Player
Maria Garcia
29%
(
15 of
52)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
60%
(
9 of
15)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Harriet Dart
61%
(
51 of
83)
1st Serve %
54%
(
44 of
81)
0
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
12
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
51%
(
42 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
38 of
81)
79
Total Points Won
85
|
1-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maria Lourdes Carle
Player
Harriet Dart
67%
(
68 of
101)
1st Serve %
51%
(
48 of
94)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
54%
(
37 of
68)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
50%
(
50 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
94)
96
Total Points Won
99
|
1-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Harriet Dart
Player
Ena Koike
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Harriet Dart
72%
(
66 of
92)
1st Serve %
46%
(
42 of
91)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
9
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
37 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Liv Hovde
Player
Harriet Dart
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
39%
(
19 of
49)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Harriet Dart
Player
Darja Semenistaja
43%
(
20 of
47)
1st Serve %
52%
(
23 of
44)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Jamie Loeb Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Ashton Bowers
Player
Jamie Loeb
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
50%
(
45 of
90)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
49%
(
35 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
90)
79
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-3 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Sophie Chang
51%
(
40 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
41 of
73)
1
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
7
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
72%
(
28 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
25 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
73)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Katrina Scott
Player
Jamie Loeb
57%
(
56 of
98)
1st Serve %
62%
(
69 of
112)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
43 of
69)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
112)
106
Total Points Won
104
|
7-6(9) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Akasha Urhobo
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
68%
(
56 of
82)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
32%
(
10 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
36 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
84
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Adriana Reami
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Kolie Allen
53%
(
32 of
60)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
65
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Bronte Murgett
45%
(
18 of
40)
1st Serve %
73%
(
30 of
41)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
14 of
18)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Valeria Savinykh
Player
Jamie Loeb
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Silvia Ambrosio
Player
Jamie Loeb
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Dart Vs Loeb Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
