Harmony Tan vs Tatiana Pieri Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W L L W W L L
Form
W W L W W W L L L LHead-2-Head: Tan 0 - 1 Pieri
They have played 3 sets in total, with Tan winning 1 and Pieri winning 2. The last match between Tan and Pieri was at the Grand Prix De SAR La Princesse Lalla Meryem - Rabat, 17-05-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Clay, with Tatiana Pieri getting the victory 4-6 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Harmony Tan | 0 |
| Tatiana Pieri | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Grand Prix De SAR La Princesse Lalla Meryem - Rabat(17-05-2025)
Tatiana Pieri
Harmony Tan
4
6
6
4
6
2
| Tan | Stats | Pieri |
|---|---|---|
| 64% (27-15) | YTD Win/Loss | 56% (22-17) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 304 | Ranking | 370 |
| 90 | Highest Rank | 322 |
| 27 | Age | 26 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 11 | Titles | 2 |
| 55% (368-300) | Career Total W/L | 55% (279-224) |
| $638,698 | Career Prize Money | $4,470 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Alcaraz VS Clar PREDICTION Grass
cinch Championships - London atp
19 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Shapovalov VS Cobolli PREDICTION Grass
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
18 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Tatiana Pieri
Player
Harmony Tan
69%
(
63 of
91)
1st Serve %
56%
(
61 of
109)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
46%
(
42 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
59 of
109)
108
Total Points Won
92
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 1 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 12 | Games Won | 16 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 2:18:31 | Average Match Time | 2:18:31 |
| 56% (61/109) | 1st Serve % | 69% (63/91) |
| 48% (29/61) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (36/63) |
| 44% (21/48) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (13/28) |
| 46% (6/13) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (8/16) |
| 46% (42/91) | Return Points Win % | 54% (59/109) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Tan vs Pieri Match Preview :
- Can consistent second serve success be a predictor of match outcomes? Tan has a slight edge, winning 41.04% of points vs. Pieri's 38.9%.
- In return games, Pieri excels in winning 52.12% of points on opponents' second serves, surpassing Tan's 48.78%.
- How do they fare under pressure? Tan saves 45.3% of breakpoints, slightly more than Pieri's 42.65%.
- Comparing overall performance, Tan has a 60% match win rate in the past year, while Pieri holds a 52.38% rate.
- Surface strengths show Tan prefers Grass with a 68% win rate, whereas Pieri thrives on Clay at 57%.
- Both players compete in similar tournaments, yet Tan slightly outperforms Pieri with a 61.67% win rate in Challengers/ITF.
- Average opponent quality is similar, with Tan playing against slightly higher-ranked players (average rank 371.08) than Pieri (397.57).
- In deciding sets, Tan shows strength, winning 67%, compared to Pieri’s 48% success rate.
- Pieri converts breakpoints more efficiently, achieving a 48.77% conversion rate over Tan's 33%.
Editorial Prediction (May 17, 2025, UTC):
Considering the performance patterns of both players, Tan shows a stronger overall match win percentage and performs well in high-pressure situations, evidenced by a higher breakpoint save percentage and a superior deciding set record.
However, Pieri's impressive return statistics and breakpoint conversion efficiency suggest she has the capability to challenge Tan's serve consistently, potentially turning the tide of the match in her favor.
Despite Tan's slight advantage in overall win percentage, the combination of Pieri's stronger return game and effective breakpoint conversion gives her the potential to outperform. Based on these factors, Pieri is the favored player to win this upcoming match.
Tan vs Pieri Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Harmony Tan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Ajla Tomljanovic
Player
Harmony Tan
66%
(
60 of
91)
1st Serve %
57%
(
46 of
81)
5
Aces
15
13
Double Faults
1
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
36 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
38 of
81)
93
Total Points Won
79
|
4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Viktorija Golubic
Player
Harmony Tan
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Harmony Tan
Player
Mariam Bolkvadze
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
69%
(
49 of
71)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
10
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
79
Total Points Won
58
|
6-0 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Harmony Tan
Player
Manon Leonard
54%
(
45 of
84)
1st Serve %
62%
(
50 of
81)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
38%
(
15 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
35 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
83
Total Points Won
82
|
6-1 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tatiana Pieri
Player
Harmony Tan
69%
(
63 of
91)
1st Serve %
56%
(
61 of
109)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
46%
(
42 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
59 of
109)
108
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alice Rame
Player
Harmony Tan
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
52
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Harmony Tan
Player
Daria Snigur
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
72%
(
48 of
67)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
49%
(
34 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
68
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Harmony Tan
Player
Viktoria Hruncakova
46%
(
24 of
52)
1st Serve %
51%
(
21 of
41)
6
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Tatiana Pieri Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Alisa Oktiabreva
Player
Tatiana Pieri
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve %
63%
(
15 of
24)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
88%
(
15 of
17)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
27%
(
3 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
36%
(
10 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
32
Total Points Won
20
|
6-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jana Fett
Player
Tatiana Pieri
51%
(
46 of
91)
1st Serve %
67%
(
58 of
87)
3
Aces
1
14
Double Faults
1
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
31%
(
14 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
51%
(
46 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
47 of
87)
92
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Radka Zelnickova
Player
Tatiana Pieri
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ajla Tomljanovic
Player
Tatiana Pieri
69%
(
68 of
98)
1st Serve %
72%
(
91 of
127)
2
Aces
0
11
Double Faults
4
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
51 of
91)
33%
(
10 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
26%
(
7 of
27)
Break Points Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
46%
(
45 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
62 of
127)
115
Total Points Won
110
|
4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tatiana Pieri
Player
Carlota Martinez Cirez
74%
(
50 of
68)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
44%
(
30 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
74
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tatiana Pieri
Player
Nicole Fossa Huergo
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
66%
(
58 of
88)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
52%
(
16 of
31)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
52%
(
23 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
53 of
88)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tatiana Pieri
Player
Harmony Tan
69%
(
63 of
91)
1st Serve %
56%
(
61 of
109)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
46%
(
42 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
59 of
109)
108
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Oleksandra Oliynykova
Player
Tatiana Pieri
79%
(
53 of
67)
1st Serve %
72%
(
47 of
65)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
43%
(
29 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
37 of
65)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (368/300) | Win/Loss | 55% (279/224) |
| 55% (823/672) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (628/513) |
| 53% (6907/6248) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (5383/4781) |
| 56% (113/90) | Hard Win/Loss | 41% (15/22) |
| 50% (130/128) | Clay Win/Loss | 57% (246/188) |
| 60% (106/72) | Indoor Hard W/L | 56% (18/14) |
| 66% (19/10) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
| 1028 | Aces Total | 219 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
| 1145 | Total Double Faults | 747 |
| 1:12:29 | Average Match Time | 1:15:20 |
| 482.13 | Average Opponent Rank | 513.58 |
| 58% (19845/34161) | 1st Serve % | 66% (16121/24600) |
| 63% (12430/19845) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (8930/16121) |
| 45% (6506/14316) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (3880/8479) |
| 50% (2116/4227) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (1768/3487) |
| 46% (15377/33132) | Return Points Win % | 49% (12154/24852) |
| 39% (14/22) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 44% (4/5) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 43% (26/34) | Main Tour W/L | 75% (3/1) |
| 55% (228/186) | Challenger W/L | 55% (205/166) |
| 65% (96/52) | Futures W/L | 55% (71/57) |
| 56% (361/642) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (273/493) |
| 10% (1/10) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 51% (57/111) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 45% (30/66) |
| 49% (82/167) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (68/143) |
| 86% (372/320) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (283/244) |
| 13% (372/50) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (283/39) |
| 16% (295/47) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (220/35) |
Tan vs. Pieri Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
