Hanwen Li vs Ray Ho Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Li vs Ho analysis and find out who is favored!
Hanwen Li vs Ray Ho Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Li has won 35.83% of points on his second serve, while Ho has won 42.27%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Li, in recent form, has won 50% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ho has won 52.38%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.1% and 27.18% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Li has saved 50% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ho has saved 58.57% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Li has won 52.38% of matches played (W/L 22/ 20), with Ho winning 51.11% (W/L 23/ 22) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Li has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 59/ 51), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 19/ 25). Ho has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 31/ 26), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Li has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 57.58% of matches (W/L 19/ 14), where as Ho has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 57.58% of matches (W/L 19/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Li winning 2 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Li winning 4 and Ho winning 0. The last match between Li and Ho was at the M15 Monastir, 09-06-2022, Second, Hard with Hanwen Li getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:32:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Li and Ho have played a deciding set 0 times, with Li winning 0 times and Ho 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Li winning 0, and Ho 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Li has played against opponents with an average rank of 178.19 while Ho has played against players with an average rank of 183.49.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Li has won 54% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ho has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Li has converted 55% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ho has converted 30.77% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Li 2 - 0 Ho
3
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
3
Minor
542
Rank
524
High
21
Age
Plays
2
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
783
Rank
715
High
24
Age
L
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
51% (78-76)
Career Total W/L
52% (127-115)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
57% (4-3)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Hanwen Li | Ray Ho |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
Games Won | 24 | 14 |
Aces (Total) | 9 | 9 |
DFs (Total) | 4 | 7 |
Avg Match Time | 1:32:0 | 1:32:0 |
1st Serve % | 58% (59/102) | 55% (72/132) |
1st Serve Win% | 83% (49/59) | 71% (51/72) |
2nd Serve Win% | 53% (23/43) | 35% (21/60) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 58% (7/12) | 40% (2/5) |
Return Points W% | 45% (60/132) | 29% (30/102) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-3 |
Hanwen Li
Player
Ray Ho
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
55%
(
39 of
71)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
6-4 6-4 |
Hanwen Li
Player
Ray Ho
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Hanwen Li | Ray Ho |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 57% (4/3) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 53% (8/7) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 51% (66/63) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 57% (4/3) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.19 |
Aces Total | 0 | 12 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.06 |
DFs Total | 0 | 4 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 240.43 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 66% (183/277) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 61% (112/183) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 35% (33/94) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 35% (7/20) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 36% (94/261) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (4/2) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 57% (4/7) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (4/4) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (4/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (3/0) |
Hanwen Li Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Wishaya Trongcharoenchaikul
Player
Hanwen Li
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
6 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Hanwen Li
Player
Thanapet Chanta
53%
(
31 of
58)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
7
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Xiaofei Wang
Player
Hanwen Li
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
42%
(
22 of
53)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
70
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Dane Sweeny
Player
Hanwen Li
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
49%
(
35 of
72)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
11
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
9 of
37)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
46%
(
35 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
42 of
72)
83
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Max Purcell
Player
Hanwen Li
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
36%
(
28 of
78)
11
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
70
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Nam Hoang Ly
Player
Hanwen Li
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
55%
(
45 of
82)
13
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
40 of
48)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
33 of
45)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
26%
(
18 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
87
Total Points Won
65
|
5-7 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Hanwen Li
Player
Markos Kalovelonis
58%
(
42 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
55 of
90)
7
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
5
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
29%
(
21 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
90)
91
Total Points Won
71
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jose Statham
Player
Hanwen Li
56%
(
48 of
86)
1st Serve %
57%
(
45 of
79)
16
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
40 of
48)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
37 of
45)
68%
(
26 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
23%
(
20 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
23%
(
18 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Zhe Li
Player
Hanwen Li
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
51%
(
39 of
77)
13
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
5
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
33%
(
27 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
89
Total Points Won
70
|
4-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Hanwen Li
Player
James McCabe
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
1
Aces
14
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
23 of
30)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Ray Ho Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Ryotaro Matsumura
Player
Ray Ho
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
67%
(
24 of
36)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
49
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ray Ho
Player
Yuki Mochizuki
71%
(
79 of
112)
1st Serve %
78%
(
83 of
107)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
61%
(
48 of
79)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
53 of
83)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
45%
(
50 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
44 of
107)
106
Total Points Won
113
|
7-6(7) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Renta Tokuda
Player
Ray Ho
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
75)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Eric Vanshelboim
Player
Ray Ho
77%
(
47 of
61)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
1
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Tatsuma Ito
Player
Ray Ho
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve %
50%
(
38 of
76)
1
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
4
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Ray Ho
Player
Colin Sinclair
61%
(
51 of
83)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
8
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
26 of
34)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
17 of
53)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Tsung-Hao Huang
Player
Ray Ho
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more