Prediction of Han Shi [210th] vs Su Jeong Jang [257th] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W L W L W W L
Form
L L W L W L L W L LHead-2-Head: Shi 0 - 0 Jang
| Shi | Stats | Jang |
|---|---|---|
| 50% (7-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 33% (3-6) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 210 | Ranking | 257 |
| 200 | Highest Rank | 114 |
| 19 | Age | 30 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 3 | Titles | 13 |
| 61% (106-67) | Career Total W/L | 59% (435-299) |
| $8,080 | Career Prize Money | $355,985 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Han Shi vs Su Jeong Jang Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Shi 0 - 0 Jang
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Shi has won 37.81% of points on their second serve, while Jang has won 41.35%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Shi, in recent form, has won 53.58% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jang has won 48.04%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.95% and 32.12% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Shi has saved 49.77% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jang has saved 43.55% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Shi has won 61.97% of matches played (W/L 44/ 27), with Jang winning 53.19% (W/L 25/ 22) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Shi has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 78% (W/L 7/ 2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 99/ 65). Jang has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 68% (W/L 77/ 37), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 56% (W/L 18/ 14).
- Player level: In the last year, Shi has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 65.57% of matches (W/L 40/ 21), where as Jang has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.26% of matches (W/L 21/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Shi has played against opponents with an average rank of 359.82 while Jang has played against players with an average rank of 240.49.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Shi has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jang has won 53% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Shi has converted 33.57% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jang has converted 40.51% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Han Shi vs Su Jeong Jang Best Odds For The Match
Han Shi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Zongyu Li
Player
Han Shi
57%
(
41 of
72)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
78)
0
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
2
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
29 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Han Shi
Player
Fangzhou Liu
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve %
66%
(
21 of
32)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
30%
(
3 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
11 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
39
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Han Shi
Player
Yidi Yang
52%
(
57 of
110)
1st Serve %
64%
(
66 of
103)
2
Aces
0
12
Double Faults
2
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
37 of
66)
43%
(
23 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
49%
(
54 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
48 of
103)
104
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(9) 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Xiaodi You
Player
Han Shi
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
39%
(
30 of
77)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
12
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
18 of
47)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
28 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
44 of
77)
82
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(7) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Han Shi
Player
Aleksandra Krunic
34%
(
19 of
56)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
69)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
41 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chengyiyi Yuan
Player
Han Shi
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
29%
(
6 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Han Shi
Player
Gabriella Da Silva Fick
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
66
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Naiktha Bains
Player
Han Shi
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
48%
(
28 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
63
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Han Shi
Player
On Yu Choi
61%
(
54 of
89)
1st Serve %
77%
(
53 of
69)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
7
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
37 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
85
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Han Shi
Player
Valentina Ivanov
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
2
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
46%
(
23 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Su Jeong Jang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Eri Shimizu
Player
Su Jeong Jang
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
7
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
44%
(
23 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Zongyu Li
Player
Su Jeong Jang
100%
(
2 of
2)
1st Serve %
33%
(
2 of
6)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
50%
(
1 of
2)
1st Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
0%
(
0 of
0)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
5
Total Points Won
3
|
1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Hanyu Guo
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jia-Jing Lu
Player
Su Jeong Jang
50%
(
21 of
42)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
7
67%
(
14 of
21)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
43%
(
18 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Su Jeong Jang
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
76%
(
66 of
87)
1
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
3
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
42 of
66)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
29 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
87)
94
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(1) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Gabriella Da Silva Fick
72%
(
53 of
74)
1st Serve %
57%
(
37 of
65)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
2-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Xinxin Yao
69%
(
57 of
83)
1st Serve %
75%
(
39 of
52)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
31%
(
8 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
49%
(
41 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
71
Total Points Won
64
|
4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hong Yi Cody Wong
Player
Su Jeong Jang
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
96)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
30 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
96)
91
Total Points Won
84
|
6-2 3-6 5-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lanlana Tararudee
Player
Su Jeong Jang
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve %
75%
(
65 of
87)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
65)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
87)
84
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Shi vs Jang?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Shi Vs Jang is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (106/67) | Win/Loss | 59% (435/299) |
| 59% (229/162) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (969/723) |
| 54% (1904/1627) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (8248/7157) |
| 0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 223 | Aces Total | 607 |
| 0.31 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 540 | Total Double Faults | 1437 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:12:45 |
| 248.69 | Average Opponent Rank | 532.86 |
| 60% (5808/9716) | 1st Serve % | 69% (22102/31968) |
| 60% (3510/5808) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (13477/22102) |
| 46% (1795/3908) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (4408/9866) |
| 48% (639/1331) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (2086/4297) |
| 48% (4706/9888) | Return Points Win % | 47% (15456/32939) |
| 60% (101/168) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (431/728) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 52% (15/29) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (70/129) |
| 57% (26/46) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (123/224) |
| 90% (101/91) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (404/357) |
| 10% (101/10) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (404/47) |
| 21% (72/15) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (330/77) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
