Hamad Medjedovic vs Liam Draxl Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W W W W L W L
Form
W W L W W L W W L LHead-to-head: Medjedovic 1 - 0 Draxl
They have played 2 sets in total, with Medjedovic winning 2 and Draxl winning 0. The last match between Medjedovic and Draxl was at the Oeiras 1 Challenger, 11-01-2025, Final, I.hard with Hamad Medjedovic getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
Oeiras 1 Challenger(11-01-2025)
6
1
6
3
76% (13-4)
YTD Win/Loss
65% (15-8)
1
Head-to-Head
0
73
Ranking
179
71
Highest Rank
171
21
Age
23
-
Plays
R
8
Titles
8
63% (153-88)
Career Total W/L
65% (180-97)
$711,625
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
0
Hard H2H
0
0
Clay H2H
0
1
Indoor H2H
0
0
Grass H2H
0
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Goffin VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
21 Mar 2025 / Second
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Monfils VS Lehecka PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
21 Mar 2025 / Second
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Medjedovic VS Draxl H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-3 |
Stats 
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Liam Draxl
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
21%
(
8 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
||||
Medjedovic VS Draxl H2H Stats
Stats
1
H2H Matches
0
2
Sets Won
0
12
Games Won
4
7
Aces (Total)
5
1
Total Double Faults
1
1:9:0
Average Match Time
1:9:0
56% (22/39)
1st Serve %
54% (28/52)
91% (20/22)
1st Serve Win %
57% (16/28)
65% (11/17)
2nd Serve Win %
42% (10/24)
71% (5/7)
Break Points Won % (Total)
25% (1/4)
50% (26/52)
Return Points Win %
21% (8/39)
100% (1/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (1/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Hamad Medjedovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Rinky Hijikata
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
71%
(
67 of
95)
1st Serve %
65%
(
70 of
107)
4
Aces
14
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
44 of
70)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
40%
(
38 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
107)
102
Total Points Won
100
|
7-5 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Stefanos Tsitsipas
66%
(
74 of
112)
1st Serve %
65%
(
69 of
106)
9
Aces
12
3
Double Faults
2
80%
(
59 of
74)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
56 of
69)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
29%
(
33 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
26 of
106)
105
Total Points Won
113
|
7-6(6) 5-7 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Ugo Humbert
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
50%
(
33 of
66)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
13
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
35 of
44)
67%
(
22 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
17 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
26 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Daniil Medvedev
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
63%
(
29 of
46)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Daniel Altmaier
73%
(
74 of
102)
1st Serve %
62%
(
69 of
111)
8
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
58 of
74)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
51 of
69)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
29 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
40 of
111)
113
Total Points Won
100
|
7-5 6-7(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Karen Khachanov
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
46%
(
22 of
48)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Raphael Collignon
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
71%
(
54 of
76)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
6
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
24%
(
14 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 5 | 1-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 2-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Liam Draxl Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Liam Draxl
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
68%
(
44 of
65)
6
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
12 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
43
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alibek Kachmazov
Player
Liam Draxl
62%
(
67 of
108)
1st Serve %
66%
(
79 of
119)
14
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
51 of
79)
61%
(
25 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
36%
(
39 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
51 of
119)
120
Total Points Won
107
|
7-6(6) 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Beibit Zhukayev
76%
(
65 of
86)
1st Serve %
52%
(
49 of
94)
4
Aces
12
3
Double Faults
4
77%
(
50 of
65)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
94)
96
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
71%
(
85 of
119)
1st Serve %
56%
(
57 of
101)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
73%
(
62 of
85)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
37 of
57)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
41 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
38 of
101)
116
Total Points Won
104
|
6-4 6-7(10) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Raphael Collignon
Player
Liam Draxl
76%
(
55 of
72)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
77)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
24 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
77)
78
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
75)
72
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Rei Sakamoto
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
71)
1
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
29 of
38)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Liam Draxl
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
78%
(
59 of
76)
10
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Adrian Andreev
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
11
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
63% (153/88)
Win/Loss
65% (180/97)
61% (334/218)
Sets Win/Loss
63% (392/229)
54% (2859/2425)
Games Win/Loss
55% (3201/2572)
59% (34/24)
Hard Win/Loss
65% (88/47)
68% (79/37)
Clay Win/Loss
60% (42/28)
59% (33/23)
Indoor Hard W/L
69% (50/22)
64% (7/4)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
0.6
Aces Per Game
0.32
1556
Aces Total
906
0.31
Double Faults Per Game
0.27
806
Total Double Faults
756
1:36:46
Average Match Time
1:39:44
316.43
Average Opponent Rank
417.87
62% (9992/16123)
1st Serve %
65% (11126/17064)
72% (7195/9992)
1st Serve Win %
70% (7742/11126)
51% (3129/6131)
2nd Serve Win %
50% (2979/5938)
44% (673/1522)
Break Points Won % (Total)
47% (886/1885)
39% (6315/16109)
Return Points Win %
42% (7301/17220)
67% (14/7)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
64% (7/4)
Masters W/L
0% (0/5)
67% (2/1)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
53% (24/21)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/2)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
63% (63/37)
Challenger W/L
57% (60/45)
70% (43/18)
Futures W/L
73% (120/45)
64% (147/230)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
66% (175/267)
20% (1/5)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
100% (3/3)
48% (43/90)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
59% (41/70)
57% (39/68)
Deciding Set Win %
54% (38/70)
89% (152/135)
1st Set Won, Won Match
91% (180/164)
11% (152/17)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
8% (180/14)
19% (88/17)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
18% (97/17)
See recent tennis photos of Medjedovic and Draxl
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
