Hamad Medjedovic vs Felix Auger Aliassime Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L W W W W L W
Form
L W W L W W W W L LHead-to-head: Medjedovic 0 - 0 Aliassime
They have played 0 sets in total, with Medjedovic winning 0 and Aliassime winning 0. The last match between Medjedovic and Aliassime was at the Qatar ExxonMobil Open - Doha, 19-02-2025, Second, Hard with Felix Auger Aliassime getting the victory w/o.
Qatar ExxonMobil Open - Doha(19-02-2025)
81% (13-3)
YTD Win/Loss
73% (16-6)
0
Head-to-Head
0
72
Ranking
18
71
Highest Rank
6
21
Age
24
-
Plays
R
8
Titles
13
64% (153-87)
Career Total W/L
63% (355-209)
$711,625
Career Prize Money
$9,146,530
1
YTD Titles
2
0
Hard H2H
0
0
Clay H2H
0
0
Indoor H2H
0
0
Grass H2H
0
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Rune VS Medvedev PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp
14 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Sabalenka VS Andreeva PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells wta
15 Mar 2025 / Final
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Medjedovic VS Aliassime H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| w/o | |||||
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Hamad Medjedovic vs Felix Auger Aliassime Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Hamad Medjedovic 0 - 0 Felix Auger Aliassime
Predictions Insights for the Upcoming Tennis Match
Performance Analysis
In the realm of recent form, both Medjedovic and Aliassime have displayed remarkable second serve performance. Over the past six months, Medjedovic, with a prowess of 52%, has marginally surpassed Aliassime's proficiency of 51.78%. The uncanny correlation between their second serve statistics and the accuracy of match predictions should not be overlooked.
Return Game Evaluation
When examining the return game statistics, noteworthy disparities emerge between Medjedovic and Aliassime. In their recent form, Medjedovic has prevailed in 51.44% of their opponent's second serve points, while Aliassime's success rate stands at 49.08%. For first serve returns, the numbers reveal further divergence, with Medjedovic at 30.07% and Aliassime at 30.49%. These figures bear high relevance in determining the favored contender in their head-to-head (H2H) matchup.
Under Pressure Assessment
Amidst moments of pressure, Medjedovic has demonstrated their ability to save 66.48% of breakpoints in recent form, closely trailing behind Aliassime's commendable figure of 67.35%. This valuable statistic holds significance when utilizing in-game betting for predictive purposes.
Overview of Performance
Over the past year, Medjedovic has showcased superiority by capturing victory in 67.14% of matches played (W/L 47/23), with Aliassime maintaining a commendable 61.67% win rate (W/L 37/23). These significant accomplishments provide an all-encompassing prediction overview for their head-to-head encounter.
Best Surface
Examining the valiance of Medjedovic and Aliassime on different surfaces, it is evident that Medjedovic excels on clay courts, attaining a 68% win rate (W/L 79/37). However, their aptitude falters on indoor hard courts, where they secure victory in only 59% of matches (W/L 33/23). In contrast, Aliassime thrives on indoor hard courts, boasting a 69% win rate (W/L 90/41), while exhibiting a modest performance on hard courts, with a win rate of 57% (W/L 114/85).
Player Level
Over the past year, Medjedovic has predominantly participated in Challenger and ITF tournaments exceeding $10,000, prevailing in an impressive 67.86% of matches (W/L 19/9). In contrast, Aliassime has predominantly competed at the main tour level, winning 62.5% of matches (W/L 15/9). When considering player statistics to determine the favorite, it is crucial to account for the disparity in event levels at which they have competed.
Opponent Quality Assessment
In the preceding 12 months, Medjedovic has encountered opponents with an average rank of 186.44, while Aliassime has faced players with an average rank of 62.65.
Deciding Set Performance
For those intrigued by live predictions and betting opportunities, it is noteworthy that Medjedovic has emerged victorious in 64% of deciding sets over the past year. In contrast, Aliassime has achieved success in 48% of all matches played on the professional tour, highlighting variations in their performances during decisive sets.
Current Event H2H Statistics
Recognizing the value of past player performance in predicting tennis matches, it is equally vital to examine current event statistics to gauge a player's current form. To access these relevant indicators, please refer to the section below (if the players have already participated in the ongoing event). Moreover, it is crucial to consider individual players' varying levels of performance at specific events when making outcome predictions.
Break Point Conversion
Within the realm of recent form, Medjedovic possesses a break point conversion rate of 43.5%, while Aliassime stands at 34.24% when capitalizing on opportunities to break their opponents' serves. These statistics hold significant implications for in-game live betting tips, particularly when either player faces a breakpoint opportunity.
If you are interested in models that provide predictions for tennis matches, this article serves as an excellent starting point. (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Hamad Medjedovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats 
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Stefanos Tsitsipas
66%
(
74 of
112)
1st Serve %
65%
(
69 of
106)
9
Aces
12
3
Double Faults
2
80%
(
59 of
74)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
56 of
69)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
29%
(
33 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
26 of
106)
105
Total Points Won
113
|
7-6(6) 5-7 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Ugo Humbert
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
50%
(
33 of
66)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
13
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
35 of
44)
67%
(
22 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
17 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
26 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Daniil Medvedev
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
63%
(
29 of
46)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Daniel Altmaier
73%
(
74 of
102)
1st Serve %
62%
(
69 of
111)
8
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
58 of
74)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
51 of
69)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
29 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
40 of
111)
113
Total Points Won
100
|
7-5 6-7(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Karen Khachanov
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
46%
(
22 of
48)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Raphael Collignon
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
71%
(
54 of
76)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
6
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
24%
(
14 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 5 | 1-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 2-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Zsombor Piros
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
51%
(
40 of
79)
1st Serve %
71%
(
54 of
76)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
82
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
view more
Felix Auger Aliassime Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Jenson Brooksby
Player
Felix Auger Aliassime
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
20 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Stefanos Tsitsipas
Player
Felix Auger Aliassime
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
4
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Felix Auger Aliassime
Player
Quentin Halys
65%
(
66 of
101)
1st Serve %
69%
(
61 of
89)
10
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
1
74%
(
49 of
66)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
40 of
61)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
37 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
89)
97
Total Points Won
93
|
5-7 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Felix Auger Aliassime
Player
Marin Cilic
67%
(
53 of
79)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
85)
13
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
32%
(
25 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
29 of
85)
83
Total Points Won
81
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Felix Auger Aliassime
Player
Nuno Borges
73%
(
67 of
92)
1st Serve %
71%
(
67 of
94)
9
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
52 of
67)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
48 of
67)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
28 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
94)
99
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Felix Auger Aliassime
Player
Alexander Bublik
72%
(
81 of
113)
1st Serve %
63%
(
79 of
126)
8
Aces
16
5
Double Faults
7
77%
(
62 of
81)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
52 of
79)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
18%
(
3 of
17)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
30%
(
34 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
47 of
126)
126
Total Points Won
113
|
7-6(7) 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Andrey Rublev
Player
Felix Auger Aliassime
70%
(
73 of
105)
1st Serve %
68%
(
76 of
112)
8
Aces
21
3
Double Faults
2
84%
(
61 of
73)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
57 of
76)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
28 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
33 of
112)
110
Total Points Won
107
|
7-5 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Felix Auger Aliassime
Player
Daniil Medvedev
61%
(
11 of
18)
1st Serve %
74%
(
20 of
27)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
91%
(
10 of
11)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
86%
(
6 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
2 of
18)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
28
Total Points Won
17
|
6-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Felix Auger Aliassime
Player
Quentin Halys
66%
(
62 of
94)
1st Serve %
68%
(
87 of
128)
13
Aces
12
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
49 of
62)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
58 of
87)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
28%
(
26 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
49 of
128)
117
Total Points Won
105
|
4-6 6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
64% (153/87)
Win/Loss
63% (355/209)
61% (333/216)
Sets Win/Loss
59% (819/561)
54% (2843/2408)
Games Win/Loss
53% (7210/6359)
60% (34/23)
Hard Win/Loss
57% (119/88)
68% (79/37)
Clay Win/Loss
65% (124/66)
59% (33/23)
Indoor Hard W/L
68% (90/42)
64% (7/4)
Grass Win/Loss
63% (22/13)
0.6
Aces Per Game
0.66
1542
Aces Total
4392
0.31
Double Faults Per Game
0.32
803
Total Double Faults
2129
1:36:33
Average Match Time
1:50:29
313.39
Average Opponent Rank
324.7
62% (9922/16016)
1st Serve %
63% (26002/41175)
72% (7151/9922)
1st Serve Win %
75% (19392/26002)
51% (3111/6094)
2nd Serve Win %
50% (7554/15164)
44% (668/1511)
Break Points Won % (Total)
40% (1492/3704)
39% (6277/16014)
Return Points Win %
38% (15890/41956)
67% (14/7)
Slam W/L
61% (40/26)
70% (7/3)
Masters W/L
52% (54/49)
67% (2/1)
Cups W/L
60% (15/10)
53% (24/21)
Main Tour W/L
65% (131/72)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
33% (1/2)
63% (63/37)
Challenger W/L
66% (65/33)
70% (43/18)
Futures W/L
76% (45/14)
64% (147/229)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
63% (317/501)
20% (1/5)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
59% (34/58)
48% (43/90)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
58% (153/262)
58% (39/67)
Deciding Set Win %
59% (100/169)
89% (152/135)
1st Set Won, Won Match
87% (332/290)
11% (152/17)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
12% (332/40)
20% (87/17)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
27% (231/62)
See recent tennis photos of Medjedovic and Aliassime
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
