Hamad Medjedovic vs Daniel Altmaier Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan

Form
W L W L W W W W L W
Form
L W W L W L L W W LHead-to-head: Medjedovic 1 - 0 Altmaier
They have played 3 sets in total, with Medjedovic winning 2 and Altmaier winning 1. The last match between Medjedovic and Altmaier was at the Open 13 Provence - Marseille, 14-02-2025, Quarterfinals, I.hard with Hamad Medjedovic getting the victory 7-5 6-7(7) 6-4.
Open 13 Provence - Marseille(14-02-2025)
7
5
6
7
6
4
81% (13-3)
YTD Win/Loss
48% (10-11)
1
Head-to-Head
0
72
Ranking
78
71
Highest Rank
47
21
Age
26
-
Plays
R
8
Titles
16
64% (153-87)
Career Total W/L
60% (400-266)
$711,625
Career Prize Money
$1,587,560
1
YTD Titles
0
0
Hard H2H
0
0
Clay H2H
0
1
Indoor H2H
0
0
Grass H2H
0
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Rune VS Draper PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp
17 Mar 2025 / Final
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Joint VS Errani PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
16 Mar 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Medjedovic VS Altmaier H2H Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-5 6-7(7) 6-4 |
![]() ![]()
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Daniel Altmaier
73%
(
74 of
102)
1st Serve %
62%
(
69 of
111)
8
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
58 of
74)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
51 of
69)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
29 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
40 of
111)
113
Total Points Won
100
|
Medjedovic VS Altmaier H2H Stats
Stats
1
H2H Matches
0
2
Sets Won
1
19
Games Won
16
8
Aces (Total)
10
2
Total Double Faults
2
2:42:15
Average Match Time
2:42:15
73% (74/102)
1st Serve %
62% (69/111)
78% (58/74)
1st Serve Win %
74% (51/69)
54% (15/28)
2nd Serve Win %
48% (20/42)
30% (3/10)
Break Points Won % (Total)
25% (1/4)
36% (40/111)
Return Points Win %
28% (29/102)
100% (1/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (1/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Hamad Medjedovic vs Daniel Altmaier Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Hamad Medjedovic 1 - 0 Daniel Altmaier
Predicciones Estelares para el PrĂ³ximo Partido de Tenis
En vista del prĂ³ximo enfrentamiento de tenis, es pertinente analizar una serie de estadĂsticas y datos relevantes que nos ayudarĂ¡n a hacer predicciones acertadas. Comencemos por evaluar el rendimiento del segundo servicio en los Ăºltimos seis meses. Durante este perĂodo, Medjedovic ha exhibido un destacado desempeño al ganar el 52.86% de los puntos con su segundo servicio, lo que demuestra una gran consistencia y dominio. Por otro lado, Altmaier ha obtenido un sĂ³lido 47.93% de puntos ganados con su segundo servicio, aunque ligeramente inferior a su oponente. Es innegable la alta correlaciĂ³n existente entre esta estadĂstica y la precisiĂ³n de las predicciones de partidos.
Otro aspecto crucial a considerar son las estadĂsticas del juego de devoluciĂ³n en la forma mĂ¡s reciente. AquĂ, observamos que Medjedovic ha mostrado un imponente desempeño al ganar el 52.25% de los puntos del segundo servicio de su oponente. Altmaier, por su parte, ha logrado un respetable 47.9% en esta Ă¡rea. Un punto clave a destacar es que en cuanto a las devoluciones del primer servicio, Medjedovic ha mantenido una destacada efectividad del 30.86%, mientras que Altmaier ha registrado un sĂ³lido 29.23%. Estas estadĂsticas son altamente correlacionadas en la elecciĂ³n del favorito en este enfrentamiento cara a cara.
Durante situaciones de presiĂ³n, analizar el desempeño bajo circunstancias cruciales se convierte en una herramienta esencial para realizar predicciones acertadas. En este sentido, Medjedovic ha demostrado una gran resistencia al salvar el 67.08% de los puntos de quiebre en su forma reciente. Por otro lado, Altmaier ha mostrado habilidad al salvar el 63.11% de estos puntos. Estos datos son de vital importancia para realizar pronĂ³sticos de apuestas durante el partido.
Si nos detenemos a evaluar el rendimiento general de ambos jugadores durante el Ăºltimo año, encontramos que Medjedovic ha ganado el 66.67% de los partidos jugados, con un impresionante registro de 44 victorias y 22 derrotas. Por otro lado, Altmaier ha obtenido un 48.57% de triunfos, con 34 victorias y 36 derrotas. Estas cifras brindan un panorama general sobre las predicciones cara a cara.
Asimismo, es interesante explorar las preferencias de superficie de cada jugador. En este sentido, Medjedovic ha demostrado tener su mejor porcentaje de victorias en Clay, con un impresionante 68% de triunfos, y su peor rendimiento en I.hard, con un 58% de victorias. Por otro lado, Altmaier ha destacado en Hard, registrando un sĂ³lido 62% de triunfos, mientras que en pista dura Grass ha obtenido un 36% de victorias. Estas estadĂsticas revelan patrones que deben tenerse en cuenta al elegir el resultado.
El nivel de cada jugador tambiĂ©n es un factor a considerar. Durante el Ăºltimo año, Medjedovic ha participado en la mayorĂa de sus partidos en los torneos Challenger/ITF con mĂ¡s de $10,000 en premios, obteniendo un 67.86% de victorias. Por su parte, Altmaier ha disputado la mayorĂa de sus encuentros en el circuito principal, alcanzando un 44.44% de triunfos. Es importante destacar que al comparar las estadĂsticas entre jugadores para predecir al favorito, todo debe ser ponderado en relaciĂ³n al nivel del evento en el cual han competido.
En lo que respecta a la calidad de los oponentes, Medjedovic ha enfrentado a jugadores con un ranking promedio de 208.61 en los Ăºltimos 12 meses. Altmaier, por su parte, ha jugado contra oponentes con una clasificaciĂ³n promedio de 248.1. Esta informaciĂ³n proporciona una perspectiva valiosa al analizar las capacidades y fortalezas de cada jugador.
En caso de que el partido llegue a un set decisivo, es crucial tener en cuenta el rendimiento en estas situaciones. Durante los Ăºltimos 12 meses, Medjedovic ha demostrado fortaleza al ganar el 61% de los sets decisivos, mientras que Altmaier ha obtenido un sĂ³lido 59% en todos sus partidos del circuito. Esta estadĂstica ofrece informaciĂ³n relevante para aquellos interesados en realizar apuestas en vivo durante el juego.
No podemos dejar de lado las estadĂsticas actuales del evento en curso. Si bien el rendimiento pasado es crucial para predecir partidos de tenis, resulta igualmente importante observar las estadĂsticas actuales del evento para detectar al jugador en mejor forma. Es recomendable echar un vistazo a la secciĂ³n a continuaciĂ³n para obtener informaciĂ³n actualizada y asĂ determinar el rendimiento de cada competidor en este evento en particular. Algunos jugadores incluso despliegan un mejor desempeño en eventos especĂficos, lo cual se debe tener en cuenta al seleccionar el resultado.
El anĂ¡lisis de la conversiĂ³n de puntos de quiebre tambiĂ©n ofrece una perspectiva valiosa en las apuestas durante el juego. Durante los Ăºltimos meses, Medjedovic ha convertido el 43.69% de las oportunidades de quiebre que se le han presentado, mientras que Altmaier ha aprovechado el 33.49% de las ocasiones para romper el servicio de sus oponentes. Esta estadĂstica resulta reveladora para aquellos que deseen realizar apuestas en vivo cuando alguno de los jugadores tenga la oportunidad de realizar un quiebre.
Finalmente, si te interesa adentrarte en el fascinante mundo de los modelos de predicciĂ³n en el tenis, este artĂculo es una excelente opciĂ³n para comenzar tu exploraciĂ³n. Ofrece interesantes anĂ¡lisis y enfoques sobre la predicciĂ³n del resultado de un torneo de tenis, basĂ¡ndose tanto en datos como en juicios expertos. Advertencia: ¡Solo para fanĂ¡ticos de las estadĂsticas!
Hamad Medjedovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Stefanos Tsitsipas
66%
(
74 of
112)
1st Serve %
65%
(
69 of
106)
9
Aces
12
3
Double Faults
2
80%
(
59 of
74)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
56 of
69)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
29%
(
33 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
26 of
106)
105
Total Points Won
113
|
7-6(6) 5-7 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Ugo Humbert
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
50%
(
33 of
66)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
13
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
35 of
44)
67%
(
22 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
17 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
26 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Daniil Medvedev
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
63%
(
29 of
46)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Daniel Altmaier
73%
(
74 of
102)
1st Serve %
62%
(
69 of
111)
8
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
58 of
74)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
51 of
69)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
29 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
40 of
111)
113
Total Points Won
100
|
7-5 6-7(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Karen Khachanov
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
46%
(
22 of
48)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Raphael Collignon
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
71%
(
54 of
76)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
6
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
24%
(
14 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Rubber 5 | 1-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
Rubber 2 | 2-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Zsombor Piros
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
51%
(
40 of
79)
1st Serve %
71%
(
54 of
76)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
82
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H |
view more
Daniel Altmaier Recent Matches Played
Before:
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
![]() ![]()
Aleksandar Kovacevic
Player
Daniel Altmaier
69%
(
70 of
101)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
90)
5
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
2
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
37 of
52)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
40 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
90)
97
Total Points Won
94
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Daniel Altmaier
Player
David Goffin
63%
(
68 of
108)
1st Serve %
55%
(
53 of
97)
10
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
50 of
68)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
37 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
38 of
97)
109
Total Points Won
96
|
6-2 6-7(12) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Daniel Altmaier
Player
Dusan Lajovic
56%
(
44 of
78)
1st Serve %
64%
(
63 of
98)
14
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
91%
(
40 of
44)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
19 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
38 of
98)
97
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 6-7(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Cristian Garin
Player
Daniel Altmaier
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Tomas Machac
Player
Daniel Altmaier
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
21 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Daniel Altmaier
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
67%
(
60 of
90)
1st Serve %
61%
(
48 of
79)
15
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
79)
87
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Daniel Altmaier
73%
(
74 of
102)
1st Serve %
62%
(
69 of
111)
8
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
58 of
74)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
51 of
69)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
29 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
40 of
111)
113
Total Points Won
100
|
7-5 6-7(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Daniel Altmaier
Player
Otto Virtanen
55%
(
40 of
73)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
9
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Daniel Altmaier
Player
Luca Nardi
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
10
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
7 of
31)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Alex De Minaur
Player
Daniel Altmaier
48%
(
26 of
54)
1st Serve %
50%
(
30 of
60)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H |
view more

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
64% (153/87)
Win/Loss
60% (400/266)
61% (333/216)
Sets Win/Loss
58% (898/649)
54% (2843/2408)
Games Win/Loss
53% (7803/6952)
60% (34/23)
Hard Win/Loss
61% (131/83)
68% (79/37)
Clay Win/Loss
61% (195/125)
59% (33/23)
Indoor Hard W/L
60% (66/44)
64% (7/4)
Grass Win/Loss
36% (8/14)
0.6
Aces Per Game
0.48
1542
Aces Total
3431
0.31
Double Faults Per Game
0.17
803
Total Double Faults
1236
1:36:33
Average Match Time
1:30:21
313.39
Average Opponent Rank
402.22
62% (9922/16016)
1st Serve %
62% (25012/40649)
72% (7151/9922)
1st Serve Win %
72% (17898/25012)
51% (3111/6094)
2nd Serve Win %
50% (7862/15637)
44% (668/1511)
Break Points Won % (Total)
42% (1679/3984)
39% (6277/16014)
Return Points Win %
39% (16117/41086)
67% (14/7)
Slam W/L
46% (13/15)
70% (7/3)
Masters W/L
43% (17/23)
67% (2/1)
Cups W/L
50% (2/2)
53% (24/21)
Main Tour W/L
41% (50/72)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
63% (63/37)
Challenger W/L
66% (138/71)
70% (43/18)
Futures W/L
68% (180/83)
64% (147/229)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
61% (383/625)
20% (1/5)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
42% (11/26)
48% (43/90)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
56% (133/238)
58% (39/67)
Deciding Set Win %
56% (106/190)
89% (152/135)
1st Set Won, Won Match
89% (391/347)
11% (152/17)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
11% (391/44)
20% (87/17)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
19% (275/53)
See recent tennis photos of Medjedovic and Altmaier
Other Predictions
- Loading news...