Guy Den Ouden vs Sumit Nagal Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L L W W W W L
Form
L L L W L W L L W LHead To Head: Ouden 1 - 0 Nagal
They have played 2 sets in total, with Ouden winning 2 and Nagal winning 0. The last match between Ouden and Nagal was at the Prague Challenger, 06-05-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Guy Den Ouden getting the victory 6-1 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Guy Den Ouden | 1 |
| Sumit Nagal | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Prague Challenger(06-05-2025)
Guy Den Ouden
Sumit Nagal
6
1
6
1
| Ouden | Stats | Nagal |
|---|---|---|
| 73% (33-12) | YTD Win/Loss | 41% (11-16) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 176 | Ranking | 300 |
| 174 | Highest Rank | 68 |
| 23 | Age | 27 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 12 | Titles | 15 |
| 67% (172-84) | Career Total W/L | 59% (342-239) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $577,520 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Fearnley VS Moutet PREDICTION Grass
cinch Championships - London atp
19 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sonego VS Zverev PREDICTION Grass
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
19 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-1 |
Stats 
Guy Den Ouden
Player
Sumit Nagal
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
17 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
35
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 2 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:11:12 | Average Match Time | 1:11:12 |
| 58% (26/45) | 1st Serve % | 62% (32/52) |
| 65% (17/26) | 1st Serve Win % | 47% (15/32) |
| 58% (11/19) | 2nd Serve Win % | 15% (3/20) |
| 78% (7/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (2/5) |
| 65% (34/52) | Return Points Win % | 38% (17/45) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Ouden vs Nagal Match Preview :
- Recent second serve performance shows Nagal winning 41.36% of points, slightly lower than Ouden's 43.23%. Could this small edge tip predictions in Ouden's favor?
- Both players are closely matched on return stats, with Nagal winning 45.9% and Ouden winning 45.91% of opponent's second serve points.
- First serve return stats are similar, with Ouden having a slight advantage at 30.23% compared to Nagal's 29.63%.
- Under pressure, Nagal has saved 51.15% of breakpoints, slightly outperforming Ouden's 48.48%, a potential edge for in-game predictions.
- Over the past year, Ouden's performance has been notably stronger, winning 67.9% of matches compared to Nagal's 41.18%.
- Both players excel on clay, but Ouden has a better win percentage at 70% compared to Nagal's 62% on this surface.
- At the Challengers/ITF level, Ouden has a marginally higher win rate of 61.9% compared to Nagal's 58.33%.
- In their direct encounter, Ouden decisively won the match against Nagal, 6-1 6-1, on clay, raising questions about Nagal's ability to challenge this time.
- Neither player has faced a tiebreak or deciding set against each other, but Nagal has a stronger record in deciding sets overall.
- Ouden tends to face opponents with lower average rankings (400.69) compared to Nagal's opponents ranked at an average of 207.61.
- Current form shows Ouden with a higher breakpoint conversion rate at 38.55%, compared to Nagal's 34.34%, a crucial detail for potential key moments in the match.
Editorial Prediction (May 6, 2025, UTC):
When comparing the recent performances and head-to-head records of Nagal and Ouden, it's clear that Ouden exhibits a slight edge across several metrics. While Nagal shows resilience under pressure, Ouden's consistency in winning matches and better conversion rates provide a compelling argument for their favorability in this upcoming match.
Additionally, Ouden's prior victory against Nagal on clay underscores their potential advantage when playing on their preferred surface. This aligns with their superior performance statistics over the past year.
Taking into account their current forms and historical context, Ouden is likely to emerge victorious in this match. Nagal will need to significantly elevate their game to alter this prediction.
Ouden vs Nagal Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Guy Den Ouden Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Ignacio Buse
Player
Guy Den Ouden
72%
(
47 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
17 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Guy Den Ouden
Player
Emilio Nava
64%
(
47 of
74)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
7
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
5
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Guy Den Ouden
Player
Marko Topo
53%
(
39 of
74)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Guy Den Ouden
Player
Gauthier Onclin
54%
(
25 of
46)
1st Serve %
64%
(
28 of
44)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Guy Den Ouden
Player
Elmer Moller
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
90)
1
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
7
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
39%
(
31 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
90)
91
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lukas Klein
Player
Guy Den Ouden
62%
(
66 of
106)
1st Serve %
62%
(
69 of
112)
3
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
44 of
69)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
38%
(
40 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
44 of
112)
110
Total Points Won
108
|
7-6(3) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Guy Den Ouden
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Guy Den Ouden
Player
Martin Landaluce
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Sumit Nagal Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Cristian Garin
Player
Sumit Nagal
60%
(
51 of
85)
1st Serve %
70%
(
65 of
93)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
42 of
65)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
42%
(
36 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
93)
87
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Alan Wazny
73%
(
74 of
102)
1st Serve %
63%
(
64 of
101)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
54%
(
40 of
74)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
37)
47%
(
9 of
19)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
50%
(
51 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
56 of
101)
107
Total Points Won
96
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
Player
Sumit Nagal
55%
(
42 of
76)
1st Serve %
68%
(
55 of
81)
4
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
33 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
81)
82
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
Player
Sumit Nagal
49%
(
53 of
108)
1st Serve %
57%
(
58 of
101)
6
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
56%
(
31 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
43%
(
46 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
49 of
101)
111
Total Points Won
98
|
7-5 6-7(2) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Tom Gentzsch
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
40 of
69)
1
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Sumit Nagal
46%
(
25 of
54)
1st Serve %
69%
(
47 of
68)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
18 of
47)
34%
(
10 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
48%
(
26 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Mitchell Krueger
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
70%
(
33 of
47)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hugo Gaston
Player
Sumit Nagal
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 67% (172/84) | Win/Loss | 59% (342/239) |
| 64% (369/210) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (781/574) |
| 56% (3049/2404) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (6628/5850) |
| 68% (67/31) | Hard Win/Loss | 57% (98/75) |
| 70% (100/43) | Clay Win/Loss | 62% (235/146) |
| 33% (5/10) | Indoor Hard W/L | 36% (9/16) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) |
| 0.24 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
| 647 | Aces Total | 795 |
| 0.32 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 846 | Total Double Faults | 1252 |
| 1:42:17 | Average Match Time | 1:33:5 |
| 269.24 | Average Opponent Rank | 475.55 |
| 60% (10267/16974) | 1st Serve % | 68% (24234/35855) |
| 68% (7003/10267) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (15553/24234) |
| 51% (3422/6707) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (5841/11607) |
| 45% (937/2084) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (1882/4269) |
| 44% (7603/17353) | Return Points Win % | 43% (15781/36823) |
| 0% (0/1) | Slam W/L | 34% (10/19) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 36% (5/9) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 50% (4/4) |
| 0% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 43% (25/33) |
| 61% (43/28) | Challenger W/L | 58% (180/133) |
| 70% (129/54) | Futures W/L | 75% (117/39) |
| 67% (168/251) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (333/558) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 25% (4/16) |
| 44% (31/71) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 58% (85/147) |
| 60% (42/70) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (88/181) |
| 91% (158/144) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (357/302) |
| 8% (158/12) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (357/53) |
| 28% (98/27) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (224/40) |
Ouden vs. Nagal Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
