Guy Den Ouden vs Raul Brancaccio Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W W W W W W L L
Form
W W L L L L W L W LHead-2-Head: Ouden 1 - 0 Brancaccio
They have played 2 sets in total, with Ouden winning 2 and Brancaccio winning 0. The last match between Ouden and Brancaccio was at the M25 Santa Margherita di Pula, 10-04-2025, Round: Quarterfinals, Surface: Clay, with Guy Den Ouden getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Guy Den Ouden | 1 |
| Raul Brancaccio | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: M25 Santa Margherita di Pula(10-04-2025)
Guy Den Ouden
Raul Brancaccio
6
3
6
2
| Ouden | Stats | Brancaccio |
|---|---|---|
| 73% (29-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 62% (21-13) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 187 | Ranking | 381 |
| 187 | Highest Rank | 121 |
| 23 | Age | 28 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 12 | Titles | 9 |
| 67% (168-83) | Career Total W/L | 58% (365-264) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $119,520 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Fearnley VS Wawrinka PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris atp
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Paolini VS Yuan PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Ouden VS Brancaccio H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Guy Den Ouden
Player
Raul Brancaccio
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
50%
(
26 of
52)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
||||
Ouden VS Brancaccio H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:31:57 | Average Match Time | 1:31:57 |
| 58% (35/60) | 1st Serve % | 50% (26/52) |
| 66% (23/35) | 1st Serve Win % | 50% (13/26) |
| 60% (15/25) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (13/26) |
| 57% (4/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (1/3) |
| 50% (26/52) | Return Points Win % | 37% (22/60) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Ouden vs Brancaccio Match Preview :
In evaluating the players' performances based on their recent form, Ouden's ability to capture 45.15% of points on their second serve is slightly better than Brancaccio's 44.35%. This marginal difference in second serve performance, which is significantly linked to match prediction accuracy, indicates Ouden's slight edge in this aspect of play.
In terms of return game effectiveness, Brancaccio holds an advantage by claiming 48.07% of their opponent's second serve points compared to Ouden's 45.61%. When looking at first serve returns, Ouden prevails by securing 29.3% compared to Brancaccio's 26.61%, giving both players reason for confidence in different areas of their return game.
Looking at performance under pressure, Brancaccio succeeds in saving 51.67% of breakpoints as opposed to Ouden's 49.42%. This can be pivotal for live match predictions, where maintaining composure under the breakpoint can determine the match dynamics.
Ouden boasts a superior match-winning percentage over the past year with 66.67% (48 wins and 24 losses), while Brancaccio has achieved 61.67% (37 wins and 23 losses). This record, along with their respective win-loss figures, provides a thorough overview of their competitive performances.
Each player's proficiency on particular surfaces also bears consideration. For Ouden, clay courts offer the best success with a 70% win rate (85 wins and 37 losses), whereas Brancaccio favors hard courts, achieving a 62% win rate (61 wins and 38 losses). Their challenges lie on I.hard for Ouden and grass for Brancaccio, where each maintains a win percentage of only 33%.
When weighing the caliber of opponents they've faced in the past year, both Ouden and Brancaccio reveal a similar competitive level. Ouden has tackled players averaging a 415.42 world rank, slightly behind Brancaccio's opponents averaging a rank of 414.42, suggesting parallel challenges faced in competition.
Ouden's success rate in deciding sets over the past 12 months stands at 54%, compared to Brancaccio's 50%, which is crucial information for live match updates and betting scenarios that might predict outcomes in closely contested matches.
Moreover, analyzing break point conversion rates provides further insight. Ouden capitalizes on 39.86% of such opportunities, outpacing Brancaccio's 34.25%, which can be quite informative for in-game strategies focusing on pivotal breakpoint moments.
Comparing their participation at different levels, Ouden excels at Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, winning 75% of matches (27 wins and 9 losses), whereas Brancaccio engages more frequently in Challengers/ITF tournaments, securing 53.13% of victories (17 wins and 15 losses), reflecting varying levels of competitive exposure.
Considering all these statistical elements, from surface performance to break point conversions and competitive histories, Ouden's consistent form on favored surfaces and higher break point conversion rate, alongside their better first serve return stats and winning record, may well tilt the scales in their favor for this matchup against Brancaccio.
Ouden vs Brancaccio Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Guy Den Ouden Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Lukas Klein
Player
Guy Den Ouden
62%
(
66 of
106)
1st Serve %
62%
(
69 of
112)
3
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
44 of
69)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
38%
(
40 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
44 of
112)
110
Total Points Won
108
|
7-6(3) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Guy Den Ouden
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Guy Den Ouden
Player
Martin Landaluce
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Guy Den Ouden
Player
Alexander Blockx
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
55%
(
52 of
94)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
94)
89
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Guy Den Ouden
Player
Hynek Barton
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
33%
(
8 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
42%
(
28 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Guy Den Ouden
Player
Sumit Nagal
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
17 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Guy Den Ouden
Player
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
27 of
49)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
40%
(
19 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Guy Den Ouden
Player
Remy Bertola
45%
(
20 of
44)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Raul Brancaccio Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Alejo Sanchez Quilez
Player
Raul Brancaccio
57%
(
45 of
79)
1st Serve %
59%
(
65 of
110)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
31 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
52 of
110)
100
Total Points Won
89
|
6-3 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Toprak Avcibasi
50%
(
19 of
38)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
9
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
54
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Vitaliy Sachko
Player
Raul Brancaccio
70%
(
59 of
84)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
36%
(
30 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
70)
83
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Marco Cecchinato
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
53%
(
21 of
40)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
7
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
5%
(
1 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
14 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jelle Sels
Player
Raul Brancaccio
52%
(
40 of
77)
1st Serve %
45%
(
41 of
92)
1
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
36%
(
28 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
46 of
92)
95
Total Points Won
74
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jiri Vesely
Player
Raul Brancaccio
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
78)
9
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
7
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
78)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Manas Manoj Dhamne
Player
Raul Brancaccio
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
80)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
7
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
35 of
43)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
11 of
37)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
80)
77
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Guy Den Ouden
Player
Raul Brancaccio
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
50%
(
26 of
52)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 67% (168/83) | Win/Loss | 58% (365/264) |
| 63% (361/208) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (824/616) |
| 56% (2987/2358) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (7024/6102) |
| 68% (67/31) | Hard Win/Loss | 62% (61/38) |
| 70% (96/42) | Clay Win/Loss | 59% (275/190) |
| 33% (5/10) | Indoor Hard W/L | 45% (28/34) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) |
| 0.24 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
| 633 | Aces Total | 996 |
| 0.31 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.28 |
| 822 | Total Double Faults | 1776 |
| 1:42:29 | Average Match Time | 1:23:43 |
| 459.09 | Average Opponent Rank | 467.76 |
| 61% (10063/16628) | 1st Serve % | 62% (23078/37241) |
| 68% (6861/10063) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (15112/23078) |
| 51% (3349/6565) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (6807/14163) |
| 45% (919/2053) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (1980/4335) |
| 44% (7465/17029) | Return Points Win % | 43% (16499/38109) |
| 0% (0/1) | Slam W/L | 40% (4/6) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 25% (1/3) |
| 0% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 31% (4/9) |
| 59% (39/27) | Challenger W/L | 51% (135/128) |
| 70% (129/54) | Futures W/L | 65% (221/118) |
| 67% (164/246) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (357/618) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 40% (2/5) |
| 43% (30/70) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (84/153) |
| 60% (42/70) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (86/183) |
| 91% (154/140) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (363/319) |
| 8% (154/12) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (363/43) |
| 28% (97/27) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (266/45) |
Ouden vs. Brancaccio Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
