Gustavo Heide vs Nerman Fatic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
G. Heide vs N. Fatic

Gustavo Heide
BRA
w
l
w
l
w
w
w
w
w
w
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
23
Age
31
-
Height
6'3" (191 cm)
304
C. Rank
214
142
Best Rank
191
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$88.0K
Career Money
$74.0K
-
Plays
Right-Handed

Nerman Fatic
BIH
w
w
w
l
w
w
l
w
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
23
Age
31
-
Height
6'3" (191 cm)
304
C. Rank
214
142
Best Rank
191
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$88.0K
Career Money
$74.0K
-
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Heide 1 - 0 Fatic
They have played 3 sets in total, with Gustavo Heide winning 2 and Nerman Fatic winning 1. The last match between Gustavo Heide and Nerman Fatic was at the San Marino Challenger, 31-07-2024, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Draw getting the victory 6-2 5-7 7-6(5).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Heide | 1 |
| Fatic | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) San Marino Challenger(07-31-24)
Gustavo Heide
6
5
7
Nerman Fatic
2
7
6
G. Heide vs N. Fatic H2H Profile
G. Heide vs N. Fatic Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gustavo Heide has won 39.93% of points on their second serve, while Nerman Fatic has won 43.74%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gustavo Heide, in recent form, has won 47.42% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nerman Fatic has won 45.45%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.59% and 28.89% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gustavo Heide has saved 48.98% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nerman Fatic has saved 53.75% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gustavo Heide has won 67.44% of matches played (W/L 29/14), with Nerman Fatic winning 75.00% (W/L 51/17) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gustavo Heide has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 141/74), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/1). Nerman Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 341/218), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/2).
- Player level: In the last year, Gustavo Heide has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 83.33% of matches (W/L 15/3), where as Nerman Fatic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 64.86% of matches (W/L 24/13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gustavo Heide winning 1 times and Nerman Fatic being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Gustavo Heide winning 2 and Nerman Fatic winning 1.
- The last match between Gustavo Heide and Nerman Fatic was at the San Marino Challenger, 31-07-2024, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Draw getting the victory 6-2 5-7 7-6(5).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:51:14.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gustavo Heide has played against opponents with an average rank of 250.79 while Nerman Fatic has played against players with an average rank of 345.6.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gustavo Heide has won 36% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nerman Fatic has won 89% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gustavo Heide has converted 30.39% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nerman Fatic has converted 35.08% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Gustavo Heide vs Nerman Fatic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
G. Heide vs N. Fatic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 18 | Games Won | 15 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 2:51:14 | Average Match Time | 2:51:14 |
| 58% (65/112) | 1st Serve % | 63% (67/106) |
| 75% (49/65) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (45/67) |
| 40% (19/47) | 2nd Serve Win % | 36% (14/39) |
| 46% (6/13) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (5/10) |
| 44% (47/106) | Return Points Win % | 39% (44/112) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Heide 54%, Fatic 52%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Heide 56%, Fatic 54%.
Break Points Saved %: Heide 67%, Fatic 61%.
G. Heide Recent Matches Played
N. Fatic Recent Matches Played

G. Heide vs N. Fatic Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63.92% (163/92) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.49% (403/286) |
| 62.41% (362/218) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.51% (888/656) |
| 54.10% (2965/2516) | Games Win/Loss | 53.04% (7574/6706) |
| 57.89% (22/16) | Hard Win/Loss | 51.19% (43/41) |
| 65.58% (141/74) | Clay Win/Loss | 61.00% (341/218) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 43.18% (19/25) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 0.43 | Aces Per Game | 0.23 |
| 1140 | Aces Total | 1568 |
| 0.31 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 819 | Total Double Faults | 1510 |
| 1:41:31 | Average Match Time | 1:19:52 |
| 379.7 | Average Opponent Rank | 509.43 |
| 56% (9127/16294) | 1st Serve % | 66% (23679/35628) |
| 72% (6574/9127) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (15504/23679) |
| 53% (3800/7166) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (5733/11949) |
| 41% (713/1720) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1961/4201) |
| 40% (6733/16785) | Return Points Win % | 43% (15552/35990) |
| 42.86% (3/4) | Slam W/L | 20.00% (1/4) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Cups W/L | 40.00% (4/6) |
| 50.00% (8/8) | Main Tour W/L | 25.00% (3/9) |
| 55.74% (68/54) | Challenger W/L | 52.91% (118/105) |
| 77.57% (83/24) | Futures W/L | 63.24% (277/161) |
| 64% (162/253) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (394/661) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 59% (46/78) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (79/156) |
| 48% (33/69) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (102/188) |
| 88% (170/150) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (393/347) |
| 12% (170/20) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (393/42) |
| 15% (85/13) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (296/57) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
10:20 PM 12/11/25
PredictionW1
1.69
W2
2.02
02:30 AM 13/11/25
PredictionW1
1.069
W2
6.55
06:30 AM 13/11/25
PredictionW1
2.4
W2
1.49
03:00 AM 13/11/25
PredictionW1
1.2
W2
3.94
10:20 PM 12/11/25
PredictionW1
2.03
W2
1.68
05:00 AM 14/11/25
PredictionW1
2.2
W2
1.58
Potential H2H Matches This Week
Heide (Montevideo Challenger)
Heide vs NavoneCould play in The Semifinals
Heide vs CecchinatoCould play in The Semifinals
Heide vs MenaCould play in The Semifinals
Heide vs BurruchagaCould play in The Semifinals
Gaubas vs HeideCould play in The Quarterfinals
Buse vs HeideCould play in The Quarterfinals
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
12 Nov 2025
Jannik Sinner vs Alexander Zverev Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 12th November 2025 Best Bets
12 Nov 2025
Marco Cecchinato vs Mariano Navone Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 12th November 2025 Best Bets
12 Nov 2025
Gustavo Heide vs Emilio Nava Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 12th November 2025 Best Bets
12 Nov 2025
Jan-Lennard Struff vs Mark Lajal Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 12th November 2025 Best Bets
12 Nov 2025
Ben Shelton vs Felix Auger Aliassime Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 12th November 2025 Best Bets
12 Nov 2025
Laslo Djere vs Tom Paris Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 12th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
12:00
H2H 5-5
22:30
H2H 5-4
H2H 7-1
13:30
H2H 6-1
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Lyon Challenger
France
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
M15 Antalya
Turkey
M15 Criciuma
Brazil
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Orlando
United States
M25 Columbus
United States
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico