Gustavo Heide vs Francisco Comesana Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
G. Heide vs F. Comesana

Gustavo Heide

BRA

0

Win

Played

2

Win

Age

Height

244

C. Rank

142

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$88.0K

Career Money

$1.0M

Plays

Francisco Comesana

ARG

0

Win

Played

2

Win

Age

Height

244

C. Rank

142

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$88.0K

Career Money

$1.0M

Plays

Head-to-head: Heide 0 - 2 Comesana

They have played 5 sets in total, with Gustavo Heide winning 1 and Francisco Comesana winning 4. The last match between Francisco Comesana and Gustavo Heide was at the Rio Open - Rio de Janeiro, 17-02-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Francisco Comesana getting the victory 7-6(2) 6-7(7) 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Heide	0
Comesana	2

Last 2 H2H Matches:

(R1) Rio Open - Rio de Janeiro(02-17-25)

Stats

Francisco Comesana

Gustavo Heide

(R2) Santa Cruz de la Sierra Challenger(09-13-23)

Stats

Francisco Comesana

Gustavo Heide

G. Heide vs F. Comesana H2H Profile

G. Heide	Stats	F. Comesana
$88,040	Career Prize Money	$1,039,600
64.50% (169-93)	Career Total W/L	62.92% (297-175)
0	Clay	2
9	Titles	10
0	Total H2H Matches	2
33.33% (1-2)	YTD Win/Loss	45.24% (19-23)

G. Heide vs F. Comesana Match Preview:

Recent form analysis of second serve performance: A comprehensive examination of recent form reveals that Comesana has displayed an impressive success rate of 49.32% in winning points on their second serve over the past six months. In contrast, Heide has exhibited even more remarkable proficiency, winning a remarkable 55.66% of points on their second serve. It is worth noting that there exists a noteworthy correlation between this statistic and the accuracy of predictions made for tennis matches.
Evaluation of return game statistics in recent form: Diligent analysis of return game statistics demonstrates that Comesana, in their recent form, has showcased their prowess by triumphing in 48.78% of their opponent's second serve points. Conversely, Heide has exhibited commendable proficiency by winning 50.4% of such points. For first serve returns, Comesana has achieved a respectable success rate of 30.63%, compared to Heide's 29.68%. Consequently, this salient data exhibits profound correlation and provides valuable insights into determining the favored player in this head-to-head matchup.
Under pressure analysis: A meticulous examination of the players' performance under pressure reveals that Comesana has demonstrated remarkable resilience by saving an impressive 59.9% of breakpoints in their recent form. On the other hand, Heide has displayed a commendable ability to salvage challenging situations by saving 58.54% of breakpoints. This particular statistic is particularly significant in making informed predictions for in-game betting.
Performance overview: Over the course of the past year, Comesana has emerged victorious in 58.82% of their matches, with a win-loss record of 40 wins and 28 losses. Similarly, Heide has achieved commendable success, winning 57.81% of their matches, signifying 37 victories and 27 defeats. By considering the comprehensive overview of their head-to-head encounters, a holistic prediction can be inferred.
Assessment of players' proficiency across different surfaces: Comesana boasts a remarkable career surface win rate of 66% on clay courts, achieving an impressive win-loss record of 248 wins and 130 losses. In contrast, their performance on indoor hard courts has been less promising, with a win rate of 0% and a sole loss. Conversely, Heide has demonstrated exceptional proficiency on clay courts, amassing a career win rate of 64% based on 123 victories and 68 losses. Notably, performing on indoor hard courts has been challenging for Heide as well, with a win rate of 0% and a single loss.
Player level analysis: Comparative analysis between Comesana and Heide reveals that Comesana has predominantly competed in the Challengers/ITF tournaments exceeding $10K, successfully winning 68.89% of their matches, translating to 31 wins and 14 losses. Heide, on the other hand, has largely participated in the Challengers/ITF tournaments surpassing $10K, achieving a commendable success rate of 61.7% with 29 victories and 18 defeats. Notably, when predicting the favored player, it is crucial to consider the level of events at which they have been competing.
Head-to-Head matchups: The two players have previously clashed on one occasion, with Comesana triumphing in all encounters, while Heide has yet to emerge victorious. Notably, they have competed across two sets, with Comesana sweeping both sets, showcasing their dominance. The most recent encounter took place at the Santa Cruz de la Sierra Challenger on September 13, 2023, on a clay surface. Comesana secured an impressive victory with sets concluding at 6-3 and 7-5.
Average duration of head-to-head matches: Historical data demonstrates that the average match time between Comesana and Heide in their previous encounters amounts to 1 hour, 33 minutes, and 8 seconds. This information provides valuable insights into the potential length of matches between these players.
Predicting results in deciding sets: Comesana and Heide have engaged in no deciding sets thus far. In hypothetical scenarios where the match extends to a deciding set, Comesana has showcased their prowess by emerging victorious in all instances, while Heide has yet to secure a triumph. This crucial statistic assists in forecasting the outcome of matches that reach the final set.
Extreme pressure situations in head-to-head matchups: Extraordinary circumstances involving tiebreaks have yet to arise in the matches contested between Comesana and Heide. Thus, no tiebreaks have been played, and consequently, Comesana has been unable to claim victory, with Heide mirroring this outcome.
Assessment of opponent quality: In the past 12 months, Comesana has consistently competed against opponents boasting an average rank of 209.01. Conversely, Heide has confronted adversaries with an average rank of 233.03. These statistics highlight the caliber of opponents faced by both players, providing additional context for performance evaluations.
Deciding set performance against all players: When assessing players' ability to perform in deciding sets, it is evident that Comesana has maintained a commendable success rate of 71% throughout the past year. In contrast, Heide has achieved a favorable win percentage of 52% in all matches played on the tour. These figures hold paramount importance, particularly for live predictions and betting, particularly in matches extending to a decisive set.
Current event head-to-head statistics: While analyzing tennis matches, it is imperative to consider not only past performance but also current event performance. Consequently, a comprehensive evaluation should incorporate current event statistics for an accurate assessment of players' current form. To acquire in-depth insights into in-form players, refer to the section below (if available), highlighting their performance in the ongoing event. Furthermore, certain players exhibit superior performance and success rates in specific events, a factor that must be diligently considered when making predictions.
Break point conversion: When scrutinizing recent form, Comesana has showcased their expertise by converting 44.02% of breakpoint opportunities received. In comparison, Heide has exhibited a slightly lower conversion rate of 40.44% when capitalizing on their chances to break their opponents' serve. This fundamental statistic undoubtedly provides valuable information for astute in-game live betting decisions, especially when a player finds themselves in a pivotal breakpoint situation.
If you have a keen interest in statistical models that effectively predict tennis match outcomes, refer to this enlightening article (Warning: Intended for those with a penchant for statistical analysis).

Gustavo Heide vs Francisco Comesana Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

G. Heide vs F. Comesana H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

G. Heide	Stats	F. Comesana
0	H2H Matches Won	2
1	Sets Won	4
24	Games Won	32
12	Aces (Total)	26
16	Total Double Faults	6
2:27:16	Average Match Time	2:27:16
60% (122/205)	1st Serve %	67% (110/163)
70% (86/122)	1st Serve Win %	85% (94/110)
51% (42/83)	2nd Serve Win %	55% (29/53)
13% (1/8)	Break Pts Won %	17% (4/23)
25% (40/163)	Return Points Win %	38% (77/205)
0% (0/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	100% (2/2)
0% (0/1)	Deciding Set Win %	100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (2/2)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/2)
0% (0/2)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/0)

Recent Performance Stats

G. Heide Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Florianopolis Challenger - 17-11-2025
F Andrea CollariniA. Collarini	W	6-2 6-3	Stats
SF Daniel Dutra Da SilvaD. Dutra	W	6-2 6-2	Stats
QF Nicolas KickerN. Kicker	W	6-2 5-1 ret.	Stats
R2 Mateus AlvesM. Alves	W	7-5 6-2	Stats
R1 Leonardo Storck FrancaL. Storck	W	6-1 6-2	Stats

View All

F. Comesana Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Rolex Paris Masters - Paris - 27-10-2025
R1 Felix Auger AliassimeF. Auger	L	6-7(2) 6-3 6-3	Stats
Q3 David GoffinD. Goffin	W	6-1 ret.	Stats
Q1 Luca Van AsscheL. Van	W	7-5 6-1	Stats
Swiss Indoors Basel - Basel - 20-10-2025
Q1 David GoffinD. Goffin	L	6-2 7-6(4)	Stats
European Open - Brussels - 13-10-2025
R2 Raphael CollignonR. Collignon	L	7-5 3-6 7-6(10)	Stats

View All

G. Heide vs F. Comesana Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

G. Heide	Stats	F. Comesana
64.50% (169/93)	YTD Win/Loss	62.92% (297/175)
62.86% (374/221)	Sets Win/Loss	60.15% (652/432)
54.29% (3047/2565)	Games Win/Loss	53.61% (5466/4729)
57.89% (22/16)	Hard Win/Loss	52.83% (28/25)
66.22% (147/75)	Clay Win/Loss	65.19% (264/141)
0.00% (0/1)	Indoor Hard W/L	37.50% (3/5)
0.00% (0/1)	Grass Win/Loss	33.33% (2/4)
0.42	Aces Per Game	0.3
1160	Aces Total	1503
0.31	Double Faults Per Game	0.16
838	Total Double Faults	816
1:41:34	Average Match Time	1:32:35
371.78	Average Opponent Rank	347.15
56% (9365/16697)	1st Serve %	66% (18227/27507)
72% (6750/9365)	1st Serve Win %	67% (12231/18227)
53% (3886/7331)	2nd Serve Win %	50% (4632/9280)
41% (741/1791)	Break Points Won % (Total)	44% (1334/3057)
40% (6967/17276)	Return Points Win %	42% (11843/28222)
42.86% (3/4)	Slam W/L	47.06% (8/9)
0.00% (0/1)	Masters W/L	59.09% (13/9)
50.00% (1/1)	Cups W/L	0.00% (0/1)
50.00% (8/8)	Main Tour W/L	41.03% (16/23)
57.36% (74/55)	Challenger W/L	66.25% (106/54)
77.57% (83/24)	Futures W/L	66.09% (154/79)
65% (168/260)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	64% (285/448)
0% (0/1)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	50% (7/14)
59% (46/78)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	51% (69/135)
49% (34/70)	Deciding Set Win %	59% (75/128)
89% (175/155)	1st Set Won, Won Match	90% (284/256)
11% (175/20)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	10% (284/28)
16% (87/14)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	22% (188/42)