Greg Rusedski vs Jan Siemerink Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L W L L W W L L
Form
L L W L W W L W L LHead-To-Head: Rusedski 3 - 6 Siemerink
They have played 25 sets in total, with Rusedski winning 11 and Siemerink winning 14. The last match between Rusedski and Siemerink was at the Grand Prix de Tennis de Toulouse - Toulouse, 28-09-1998, Final, Hard with Jan Siemerink getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Greg Rusedski | 3 |
| Jan Siemerink | 6 |
Grand Prix de Tennis de Toulouse - Toulouse(28-09-1998)
6
4
6
4
| Rusedski | Stats | Siemerink |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 3 | Head-to-Head | 6 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 29 | Highest Rank | 435 |
| 51 | Age | 55 |
| L | Plays | L |
| 15 | Titles | 5 |
| 60% (438-294) | Career Total W/L | 51% (303-292) |
| $397,980 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 4 |
| 2 | Indoor H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sabalenka VS Stearns PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
28 Apr 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Kostyuk VS Potapova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
28 Apr 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 | |||||
| 4-6 6-4 5-7 6-2 6-4 | |||||
| 4-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | |||||
| 6-4 6-3 | |||||
| 4-6 6-3 6-2 | |||||
| 7-6(4) 6-3 | |||||
| 2-6 6-4 6-4 | |||||
| 6-4 6-7(5) 6-3 | |||||
| 6-4 6-1 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | H2H Matches | 6 |
| 11 | Sets Won | 14 |
| 124 | Games Won | 124 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 38% (3/8) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (5/8) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 33% (1/3) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 67% (2/3) |
| 20% (1/5) | Deciding Set Win % | 80% (4/5) |
| 40% (5/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 75% (4/3) |
| 60% (5/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 25% (4/1) |
| 25% (4/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 60% (5/3) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Greg Rusedski Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 2-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 1 | 1-6 6-3 5-7 6-4 9-7 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats 
Tim Henman
Player
Greg Rusedski
65%
(
55 of
85)
1st Serve %
62%
(
57 of
92)
8
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
5
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
37 of
57)
70%
(
21 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
23 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
92)
100
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(4) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-6(2) 6-7(7) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Ivan Ljubicic
Player
Greg Rusedski
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
71%
(
36 of
51)
6
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
94%
(
30 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
10 of
15)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
8 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
19 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mikhail Youzhny
Player
Greg Rusedski
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marat Safin
Player
Greg Rusedski
61%
(
48 of
79)
1st Serve %
63%
(
60 of
96)
13
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
5
81%
(
39 of
48)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
45 of
60)
74%
(
23 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
17 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
35 of
96)
97
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Jan Siemerink Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 7-6(1) | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-6(2) 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (438/294) | Win/Loss | 51% (303/292) |
| 57% (1097/825) | Sets Win/Loss | 51% (775/754) |
| 52% (10250/9457) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (7639/7607) |
| 58% (164/121) | Hard Win/Loss | 54% (120/104) |
| 36% (29/52) | Clay Win/Loss | 39% (39/60) |
| 66% (159/83) | Indoor Hard W/L | 54% (116/98) |
| 69% (86/38) | Grass Win/Loss | 48% (28/30) |
| 0.04 | Aces Per Game | 0 |
| 374 | Aces Total | 0 |
| 0.02 | Double Faults Per Game | 0 |
| 227 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 374.78 | Average Opponent Rank | 303.3 |
| 60% (2107/3532) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 73% (1528/2096) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (702/1417) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 38% (85/223) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 33% (1079/3318) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 53% (55/48) | Slam W/L | 46% (37/44) |
| 47% (64/73) | Masters W/L | 46% (47/56) |
| 58% (14/10) | Cups W/L | 64% (9/5) |
| 66% (288/148) | Main Tour W/L | 53% (185/165) |
| 50% (2/2) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 41% (7/10) | Challenger W/L | 56% (25/20) |
| 61% (366/596) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (264/500) |
| 54% (72/134) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 42% (37/89) |
| 56% (260/466) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (156/288) |
| 57% (143/252) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (99/199) |
| 83% (427/354) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (302/242) |
| 17% (427/72) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 20% (302/60) |
| 28% (305/84) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (293/63) |
Rusedski vs. Siemerink Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
