M. Hurrion
To Win
M. Summers
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W L L W L L LForm
L L L W W W L W W WThey have played 2 sets in total, with Nanda winning 2 and Hurrion winning 0. The last match between Nanda and Hurrion was at the Cuernavaca Challenger, 30-03-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Hard, with Govind Nanda getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Govind Nanda | 1 |
Millen Hurrion | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Cuernavaca Challenger(30-03-2025)
Nanda | Stats | Hurrion |
---|---|---|
46% (12-14) | YTD Win/Loss | 65% (20-11) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
369 | Ranking | 806 |
339 | Highest Rank | 681 |
24 | Age | 25 |
R | Plays | - |
5 | Titles | 0 |
58% (150-110) | Career Total W/L | 63% (104-60) |
$56,390 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
14 Jun 2025 / Semifinals
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
14 Jun 2025 / Q1 round
Boss Open - Stuttgart atp
14 Jun 2025 / Semifinals
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-4 |
![]() ![]()
Govind Nanda
Player
Millen Hurrion
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
54%
(
40 of
74)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
74)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 7 |
0 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
1 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
1:29:42 | Average Match Time | 1:29:42 |
56% (32/57) | 1st Serve % | 54% (40/74) |
78% (25/32) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (26/40) |
60% (15/25) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (17/34) |
75% (3/4) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
42% (31/74) | Return Points Win % | 30% (17/57) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Welcome, dear tennis enthusiasts, to a showdown so grand, it’s practically Wimbledon on a Tuesday! Our contenders: Nanda and Hurrion, who are ready to dance around the court like two cats on a hot tin roof. Let's dive into their stats with the hope of predicting who’ll waltz away with victory.
First, the second serve, that sneaky giant in tennis stat land. In recent outings, Nanda has pocketed a solid 44.35% of points on their second serve, playing it cool. Not to be outdone, Hurrion holds his own at 43.85%, just a whisker behind. If these percentages were slices of pie, Nanda would have a slightly bigger bite.
On the flip side, return game stats paint another picture. Both players are like hungry dogs chasing a ball, but Nanda nibbles 44.09% of their opponent’s second serve points right off the board, whereas Hurrion crunches on 44.12%. In the land of first serves, Nanda returns 29.45% while Hurrion manages 25.31%. These numbers suggest Nanda might just have the upper paw in this feline face-off.
Moving on to pressure, where the game's afoot and so are the nerves. Nanda saves 52.17% of breakpoints like a pro swatting away flies. Meanwhile, Hurrion tips his hat with a slightly superior 53.37%. When the stakes are high, both players show they aren’t too shabby under fire.
Performance-wise, over the past year, both competitors have pranced along with nearly identical win rates: Nanda at 59.65% and Hurrion at 59.26%. It's a close call, but these numbers leave us biting our nails!
Surface preferences add another twist. Nanda claims the clay with a 61% win rate, as if hoping to plant a garden there. On the flip side, he isn’t too jazzed about indoor hard courts, claiming only 39%. Meanwhile, Hurrion loves indoor hard surfaces with a solid 67% win rate, though he frolics less confidently on the grass with an even-steven 50%.
Now, a quick peek at the quality of foes faced – Nanda has been dueling dragons with an average opponent rank of 316.65, while Hurrion battles slightly less intimidating goblins ranked at 363.19. Meanwhile, both are gladiators in grand arenas, but Nanda more on the Challenger tours, fighting valiantly with a 50% win rate, while Hurrion smashes it in the lower echelons with 59.26% wins.
If this match hits a deciding set, Nanda becomes a man possessed, winning 71% of such battles – the hero Gotham deserves. Hurrion isn’t far behind, clinching 57% of final set showdowns. In this narrative, when the chips are down, Nanda seems to strut with confidence.
Finally, it's all about the break point conversion – where games can be won and lost in the blink of an eye. Recent form suggests Nanda converts 31.06% of opportunities into a roaring success, which is notably more than Hurrion’s 25%.
So, with all these numbers jostling and juggling in the statistical circus, it appears that Nanda just might prod the ball a little harder across the net. The grass whispers his name, and so does my prediction for the crowned prince of this tennis tussle: Advantage, Nanda!
Nanda vs Hurrion Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Alex Rybakov
Player
Govind Nanda
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
76%
(
47 of
62)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Alexis Galarneau
Player
Govind Nanda
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Arda Azkara
Player
Govind Nanda
50%
(
31 of
62)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Govind Nanda
Player
Unknown Player
95%
(
42 of
44)
1st Serve %
89%
(
41 of
46)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
50%
(
1 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
60
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Bruno Kuzuhara
Player
Govind Nanda
78%
(
58 of
74)
1st Serve %
74%
(
55 of
74)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
13 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(7) 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Juan Carlos Prado Angelo
Player
Govind Nanda
66%
(
60 of
91)
1st Serve %
72%
(
61 of
85)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
55%
(
33 of
60)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
40 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
43 of
85)
94
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Govind Nanda
Player
Azariah Rusher
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Vladyslav Orlov
Player
Govind Nanda
62%
(
53 of
85)
1st Serve %
49%
(
43 of
87)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
69%
(
22 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
27 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
87)
96
Total Points Won
76
|
6-1 5-7 6-3 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
![]() ![]()
Millen Hurrion
Player
Andrea Fiorentini
70%
(
62 of
89)
1st Serve %
66%
(
61 of
93)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
37 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
94
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Millen Hurrion
Player
Leevi Saatela
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
49%
(
25 of
51)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Millen Hurrion
Player
Tom Zeuch
74%
(
53 of
72)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Tuncay Duran
Player
Millen Hurrion
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Millen Hurrion
Player
Amr Elsayed
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
31%
(
11 of
35)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
14 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
46
Total Points Won
29
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Millen Hurrion
Player
Nino Ehrenschneider
68%
(
86 of
127)
1st Serve %
72%
(
69 of
96)
1
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
49 of
69)
56%
(
23 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
38%
(
48 of
127)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
31 of
96)
110
Total Points Won
113
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Millen Hurrion
Player
Miles Jones
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve %
62%
(
47 of
76)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
35%
(
9 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Ewen Lumsden
Player
Millen Hurrion
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
58% (150/110) | Win/Loss | 63% (104/60) |
56% (340/270) | Sets Win/Loss | 61% (220/142) |
52% (2973/2761) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (1883/1563) |
60% (112/75) | Hard Win/Loss | 62% (60/37) |
58% (29/21) | Clay Win/Loss | 63% (5/3) |
39% (9/14) | Indoor Hard W/L | 69% (35/16) |
0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) |
0.21 | Aces Per Game | 0.3 |
591 | Aces Total | 506 |
0.12 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
349 | Total Double Faults | 412 |
1:26:41 | Average Match Time | 1:27:12 |
413.46 | Average Opponent Rank | 406.17 |
62% (9019/14563) | 1st Serve % | 64% (6009/9362) |
65% (5899/9019) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (4148/6009) |
49% (2723/5544) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (1732/3353) |
43% (688/1602) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (403/941) |
42% (6236/14853) | Return Points Win % | 40% (3719/9280) |
25% (1/3) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
50% (1/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
50% (1/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
44% (42/53) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/2) |
67% (105/52) | Futures W/L | 64% (104/58) |
57% (145/253) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 64% (103/160) |
75% (3/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
59% (41/69) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 44% (16/36) |
54% (48/89) | Deciding Set Win % | 68% (23/34) |
87% (129/112) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 94% (95/89) |
13% (129/17) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 5% (95/5) |
28% (131/37) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (69/15) |