Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Govind Nanda vs Evan Song Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nanda vs Song analysis and find out who is favored!
Govind Nanda vs Evan Song Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nanda has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Song has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nanda, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Song has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nanda has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Song has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nanda has won 50% of matches played (W/L 3/ 3), with Song winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nanda has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 28/ 17), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 8). Song has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 54% (W/L 19/ 16), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 31% (W/L 11/ 24).
- Player level: In the last year, Nanda has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 2/ 2), where as Song has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nanda winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Nanda winning 1 and Song winning 2. The last match between Nanda and Song was at the M25 Claremont, 11-10-2019, Second, Hard with Evan Song getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nanda and Song have played a deciding set 1 times, with Nanda winning 0 times and Song 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Nanda winning 0, and Song 2.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nanda has played against opponents with an average rank of 101.67 while Song has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nanda has won 100% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Song has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nanda has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Song has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nanda 0 - 1 Song
835
Rank
339
High
23
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
314
High
31
Age
L
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
58% (112-80)
Career Total W/L
52% (219-203)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$56,390
Career Prize Money
$7,140
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Govind Nanda | Evan Song |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
| Games Won | 18 | 16 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(3) 2-6 7-6(3) | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Govind Nanda | Evan Song |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Govind Nanda Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Alexander Kotzen
Player
Govind Nanda
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Govind Nanda
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
57%
(
20 of
35)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
45%
(
24 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
69)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Govind Nanda
Player
Huzaifa Abdul Rehman
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
27 of
48)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Govind Nanda
Player
Thomas Brown
61%
(
61 of
100)
1st Serve %
76%
(
64 of
84)
10
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
37 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
28 of
84)
91
Total Points Won
93
|
7-6(4) 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kyrian Jacquet
Player
Govind Nanda
51%
(
30 of
59)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Govind Nanda
Player
Isaiah Strode
64%
(
64 of
100)
1st Serve %
49%
(
43 of
88)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
41%
(
41 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
95
Total Points Won
93
|
2-6 7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federico Agustin Gomez
Player
Govind Nanda
47%
(
29 of
62)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
4
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Govind Nanda
Player
Aidan Kim
59%
(
43 of
73)
1st Serve %
45%
(
37 of
83)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
9
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matthew Segura
Player
Govind Nanda
63%
(
57 of
90)
1st Serve %
62%
(
56 of
90)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
40 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
45 of
90)
95
Total Points Won
85
|
2-6 7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Govind Nanda
Player
Huzaifa Abdul Rehman
65%
(
53 of
82)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
82)
87
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Evan Song Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Aidan Mchugh
Player
Evan Song
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
74%
(
37 of
50)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
18 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Evan King
Player
Evan Song
78%
(
47 of
60)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
6
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Evan Song
Player
Duckhee Lee
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
60%
(
44 of
73)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Evan Song
54%
(
39 of
72)
1st Serve %
72%
(
42 of
58)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Evan Song
Player
Yusuke Takahashi
60%
(
54 of
90)
1st Serve %
60%
(
65 of
108)
11
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
3
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
37 of
65)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
35 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
48 of
108)
103
Total Points Won
95
|
4-6 7-5 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matias Soto
Player
Evan Song
49%
(
36 of
74)
1st Serve %
77%
(
81 of
105)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
47 of
81)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
105)
92
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Evan Song
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolas Mejia
Player
Evan Song
52%
(
44 of
85)
1st Serve %
58%
(
44 of
76)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
32 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
76)
82
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Evan Song
Player
Dennis Novikov
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve %
46%
(
31 of
67)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Evan Song
Player
James Hopper
67%
(
60 of
89)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
79)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
79)
94
Total Points Won
74
|
6-1 6-7(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Nanda Vs Song Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
