J. Anthrop
To Win
G. Nanda
To Win
Govind Nanda vs Azariah Rusher Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W L L W L L L
Form
L W L W L L W L L LHead-2-Head: Nanda 1 - 0 Rusher
They have played 2 sets in total, with Nanda winning 2 and Rusher winning 0. The last match between Nanda and Rusher was at the Tallahassee Challenger, 13-04-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Clay, with Govind Nanda getting the victory 7-5 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Govind Nanda | 1 |
| Azariah Rusher | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Tallahassee Challenger(13-04-2025)
Govind Nanda
Azariah Rusher
7
5
6
4
| Nanda | Stats | Rusher |
|---|---|---|
| 46% (12-14) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-1) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 367 | Ranking | N/A |
| 339 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 24 | Age | 20 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 5 | Titles | 0 |
| 58% (150-110) | Career Total W/L | 45% (9-11) |
| $56,390 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
25 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Montgomery VS Tig PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London wta
25 Jun 2025 / Q2 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Masarova VS Stojanovic PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London wta
25 Jun 2025 / Q2 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-4 |
Stats 
Govind Nanda
Player
Azariah Rusher
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
61
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 9 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:38:21 | Average Match Time | 1:38:21 |
| 60% (37/62) | 1st Serve % | 57% (39/69) |
| 65% (24/37) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (26/39) |
| 64% (16/25) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (13/30) |
| 67% (4/6) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 100% (2/2) |
| 43% (30/69) | Return Points Win % | 35% (22/62) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Nanda vs Rusher Match Preview :
Analyzing the players' recent performances provides valuable insights into predicting the outcome of the upcoming tennis match. Over the past six months, Nanda has shown superior capability on the second serve, winning 44.27% of points compared to Rusher's 26.32%. This disparity is often a strong indicator in forecasting match results.
The return game statistics highlight Rusher's strength, having won 57.14% of points on their opponent's second serve, surpassing Nanda's 44.66%. For first serve returns, Nanda edges out with a slight advantage, winning 28.93% over Rusher's 27.27%, suggesting a competitive head-to-head matchup.
When under pressure, Rusher appears more resilient, saving 70% of breakpoints, compared to Nanda’s 51.65%. However, in terms of converting breakpoints, Nanda's recent form indicates a higher conversion rate at 31.88%, while Rusher trails with only 11.11%.
Over the last year, Nanda has demonstrated a more consistent performance, winning 59.02% of their matches compared to Rusher's 25%. These figures serve as a critical component in the overall head-to-head outlook. Surface preferences show that both players have excelled on hard courts, with Rusher at a 63% win rate and Nanda at 61%, yet Rusher significantly falters on clay.
The level of competition each player faces also plays a role in predictions. While Rusher mainly competes at Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a 25% win rate, Nanda frequently competes at the Challengers/ITF level with a 50% win rate. Nanda has faced opponents with an average rank of 332.85, while Rusher's opponents' average rank remains inexplicably low.
If this match progresses to a deciding set, Nanda's decisive edge becomes apparent, having won 63% of such sets versus Rusher's 0% success rate over the last year. The aggregated performance metrics clearly favor Nanda, suggesting they are poised to emerge victorious in the upcoming contest based on current statistics and recent form.
Nanda vs Rusher Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Govind Nanda Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Rybakov
Player
Govind Nanda
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
76%
(
47 of
62)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexis Galarneau
Player
Govind Nanda
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Arda Azkara
Player
Govind Nanda
50%
(
31 of
62)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Govind Nanda
Player
Unknown Player
95%
(
42 of
44)
1st Serve %
89%
(
41 of
46)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
50%
(
1 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
60
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bruno Kuzuhara
Player
Govind Nanda
78%
(
58 of
74)
1st Serve %
74%
(
55 of
74)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
13 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(7) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juan Carlos Prado Angelo
Player
Govind Nanda
66%
(
60 of
91)
1st Serve %
72%
(
61 of
85)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
55%
(
33 of
60)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
40 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
43 of
85)
94
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Govind Nanda
Player
Azariah Rusher
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Vladyslav Orlov
Player
Govind Nanda
62%
(
53 of
85)
1st Serve %
49%
(
43 of
87)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
69%
(
22 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
27 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
87)
96
Total Points Won
76
|
6-1 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Azariah Rusher Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Govind Nanda
Player
Azariah Rusher
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Piotr Siekanowicz
Player
Azariah Rusher
72%
(
55 of
76)
1st Serve %
75%
(
57 of
76)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
38 of
57)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
82
Total Points Won
70
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Gianni Ross
Player
Azariah Rusher
48%
(
32 of
66)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
45%
(
30 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 2-6 10-7 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (150/110) | Win/Loss | 45% (9/11) |
| 56% (340/270) | Sets Win/Loss | 49% (21/22) |
| 52% (2973/2761) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (215/216) |
| 60% (112/75) | Hard Win/Loss | 63% (5/3) |
| 58% (29/21) | Clay Win/Loss | 29% (2/5) |
| 39% (9/14) | Indoor Hard W/L | 40% (2/3) |
| 0.21 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 591 | Aces Total | 12 |
| 0.12 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 349 | Total Double Faults | 47 |
| 1:26:41 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 413.28 | Average Opponent Rank | 144.65 |
| 62% (9019/14563) | 1st Serve % | 66% (394/594) |
| 65% (5899/9019) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (262/394) |
| 49% (2723/5544) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (79/200) |
| 43% (688/1602) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (29/72) |
| 42% (6236/14853) | Return Points Win % | 43% (262/611) |
| 25% (1/3) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 44% (42/53) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 67% (105/52) | Futures W/L | 47% (9/10) |
| 57% (145/253) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 45% (9/20) |
| 75% (3/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 59% (41/69) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 33% (1/3) |
| 54% (48/89) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 87% (129/112) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (9/9) |
| 13% (129/17) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (9/0) |
| 28% (131/37) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (11/0) |
Nanda vs. Rusher Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
