Govind Nanda vs Azariah Rusher Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Analyzing the players' recent performances provides valuable insights into predicting the outcome of the upcoming tennis match. Over the past six months, Nanda has shown superior capability on the second serve, winning 44.27% of points compared to Rusher's 26.32%. This disparity is often a strong indicator in forecasting match results.

The return game statistics highlight Rusher's strength, having won 57.14% of points on their opponent's second serve, surpassing Nanda's 44.66%. For first serve returns, Nanda edges out with a slight advantage, winning 28.93% over Rusher's 27.27%, suggesting a competitive head-to-head matchup.

When under pressure, Rusher appears more resilient, saving 70% of breakpoints, compared to Nanda’s 51.65%. However, in terms of converting breakpoints, Nanda's recent form indicates a higher conversion rate at 31.88%, while Rusher trails with only 11.11%.

Over the last year, Nanda has demonstrated a more consistent performance, winning 59.02% of their matches compared to Rusher's 25%. These figures serve as a critical component in the overall head-to-head outlook. Surface preferences show that both players have excelled on hard courts, with Rusher at a 63% win rate and Nanda at 61%, yet Rusher significantly falters on clay.

The level of competition each player faces also plays a role in predictions. While Rusher mainly competes at Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a 25% win rate, Nanda frequently competes at the Challengers/ITF level with a 50% win rate. Nanda has faced opponents with an average rank of 332.85, while Rusher's opponents' average rank remains inexplicably low.

If this match progresses to a deciding set, Nanda's decisive edge becomes apparent, having won 63% of such sets versus Rusher's 0% success rate over the last year. The aggregated performance metrics clearly favor Nanda, suggesting they are poised to emerge victorious in the upcoming contest based on current statistics and recent form.