Gonzalo Lama vs Patrik Rikl Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lama vs Rikl analysis and find out who is favored!
Gonzalo Lama vs Patrik Rikl Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lama has won 49.57% of points on his second serve, while Rikl has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lama, in recent form, has won 48.11% of his opponent's second serve points, while Rikl has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.22% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lama has saved 62.71% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Rikl has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lama has won 41.03% of matches played (W/L 16/ 23), with Rikl winning 66.67% (W/L 18/ 9) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lama has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 362/ 245), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Rikl has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 26/ 13), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Lama has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 40% of matches (W/L 12/ 18), where as Rikl has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 75% of matches (W/L 15/ 5). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Lama winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Lama winning 1 and Rikl winning 2. The last match between Lama and Rikl was at the M25 Velenje, 10-07-2021, Semifinals, Clay with Patrik Rikl getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:40:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Lama and Rikl have played a deciding set 1 times, with Lama winning 0 times and Rikl 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Lama winning 0, and Rikl 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lama has played against opponents with an average rank of 321.08 while Rikl has played against players with an average rank of 185.74.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lama has won 77% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Rikl has won 63% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lama has converted 30.3% of breakpoint opportunities, and Rikl has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Lama 0 - 1 Rikl
16
Total
0
Mast
2
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
14
Minor
515
Rank
160
High
30
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
700
Rank
392
High
25
Age
R
Plays
6
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
6
Minor
Form
57% (381-282)
Career Total W/L
62% (139-87)
0% (0-1)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$18,335
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Gonzalo Lama | Patrik Rikl |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
Games Won | 13 | 16 |
Aces (Total) | 7 | 6 |
DFs (Total) | 2 | 2 |
Avg Match Time | 2:40:0 | 2:40:0 |
1st Serve % | 65% (67/103) | 53% (44/83) |
1st Serve Win% | 69% (46/67) | 77% (34/44) |
2nd Serve Win% | 53% (19/36) | 67% (26/39) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 25% (1/4) | 20% (2/10) |
Return Points W% | 28% (23/83) | 37% (38/103) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4-6 6-3 6-4 |
Patrik Rikl
Player
Gonzalo Lama
53%
(
44 of
83)
1st Serve %
65%
(
67 of
103)
6
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
46 of
67)
67%
(
26 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
23 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
103)
98
Total Points Won
88
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Gonzalo Lama | Patrik Rikl |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 14% (2/12) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.29 | 0 |
DFs Total | 2 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:10:1 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 481 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 38% (17/45) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 47% (8/17) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 36% (10/28) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 27% (12/44) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Gonzalo Lama Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Edan Leshem
Player
Gonzalo Lama
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
38%
(
17 of
45)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
Player
Gonzalo Lama
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
8
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Wilson Leite
Player
Gonzalo Lama
59%
(
58 of
98)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
85)
11
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
0
81%
(
47 of
58)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
39 of
55)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
31 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
26 of
85)
93
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(10) 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Gonzalo Lama
Player
Ignacio Carou
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
9
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
4
85%
(
35 of
41)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
10%
(
1 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
16 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
32 of
85)
87
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
QF |
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
Player
Gonzalo Lama
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Gonzalo Lama
Player
Facundo Juarez
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
71%
(
39 of
55)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
16 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco
Player
Gonzalo Lama
68%
(
71 of
104)
1st Serve %
52%
(
66 of
127)
7
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
75%
(
53 of
71)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
48 of
66)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
33%
(
34 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
52 of
127)
122
Total Points Won
109
|
6-7(2) 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Gonzalo Lama
Player
Hernan Casanova
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
68%
(
25 of
37)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
47%
(
15 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
50%
(
23 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
45
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 0-2 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Lorenzo Claverie
Player
Gonzalo Lama
54%
(
47 of
87)
1st Serve %
56%
(
53 of
94)
20
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
10
89%
(
42 of
47)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
42 of
53)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
24%
(
21 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
30 of
94)
96
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(3) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
QF |
Luciano Darderi
Player
Gonzalo Lama
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve %
69%
(
34 of
49)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
55
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Patrik Rikl Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF | 3-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Constantin Bittoun Kouzmine
Player
Patrik Rikl
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
48%
(
20 of
42)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
52
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
F |
Patrik Rikl
Player
Andrew Paulson
68%
(
68 of
100)
1st Serve %
53%
(
59 of
112)
14
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
5
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
43 of
59)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
32 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
38 of
112)
106
Total Points Won
106
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
Patrik Rikl
Player
Vladyslav Orlov
51%
(
29 of
57)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
8
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Patrik Rikl
Player
Lukas Palovic
50%
(
7 of
14)
1st Serve %
45%
(
10 of
22)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
100%
(
7 of
7)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
2 of
14)
Rtn Points Won
77%
(
17 of
22)
29
Total Points Won
7
|
6-0 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
Patrik Rikl
Player
Jiri Barnat
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Patrik Rikl
Player
Fryderyk Lechno-Wasiutynski
46%
(
19 of
41)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
100%
(
19 of
19)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
8 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Jiri Jenicek
Player
Patrik Rikl
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
75)
1
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
6-0 3-6 10-6 | H2H |
view more