Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Gonzalo Lama vs Federico Gaio Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lama vs Gaio analysis and find out who is favored!
Gonzalo Lama vs Federico Gaio Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lama has won 52.34% of points on his second serve, while Gaio has won 48.88%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lama, in recent form, has won 46.23% of his opponent's second serve points, while Gaio has won 48.35%. The same stats for first serve returns are 23.53% and 25.03% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lama has saved 57.69% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gaio has saved 58.7% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lama has won 43.24% of matches played (W/L 16/ 21), with Gaio winning 44.44% (W/L 24/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lama has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 362/ 245), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Gaio has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 323/ 250), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 5/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Lama has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 42.86% of matches (W/L 12/ 16), where as Gaio has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 46.67% of matches (W/L 21/ 24). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Lama winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Lama winning 0 and Gaio winning 2. The last match between Lama and Gaio was at the Biella Challenger, 26-07-2016, First, Clay with Federico Gaio getting the victory 1100038094.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:7:21.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Lama and Gaio have played a deciding set 0 times, with Lama winning 0 times and Gaio 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Lama winning 0, and Gaio 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lama has played against opponents with an average rank of 338.43 while Gaio has played against players with an average rank of 265.15.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lama has won 77% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gaio has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lama has converted 10% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gaio has converted 32.29% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Lama 0 - 1 Gaio
528
Rank
160
High
30
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
247
Rank
124
High
32
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
Form
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
57% (381-282)
Career Total W/L
54% (515-433)
0% (0-1)
YTD W/L
21% (3-11)
$18,335
Career Prize Money
$392,005
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Gonzalo Lama | Federico Gaio |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 5 | 11 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:7:21 | 1:7:21 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (34/50) | 72% (31/43) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 56% (19/34) | 74% (23/31) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 44% (7/16) | 67% (8/12) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 50% (4/8) |
| Return Points W% | 28% (12/43) | 48% (24/50) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 4-0 ret. |
Stats 
Federico Gaio
Player
Gonzalo Lama
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
55
Total Points Won
38
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Gonzalo Lama | Federico Gaio |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/1) | 21% (3/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 24% (8/25) |
| Games Win/Loss | 14% (2/12) | 40% (123/182) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 22% (2/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 20% (1/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.38 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 56 |
| DFs per game | 0.29 | 0.35 |
| DFs Total | 2 | 52 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:10:1 | 1:40:26 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 481 | 237.07 |
| 1st Serve % | 38% (17/45) | 56% (538/965) |
| 1st Serve W% | 47% (8/17) | 67% (359/538) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 36% (10/28) | 47% (200/427) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/3) | 31% (22/71) |
| Return Pts W% | 27% (12/44) | 33% (326/977) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 20% (2/8) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 15% (2/13) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 21% (14/3) |
Gonzalo Lama Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Edan Leshem
Player
Gonzalo Lama
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
38%
(
17 of
45)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
Player
Gonzalo Lama
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
8
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Wilson Leite
Player
Gonzalo Lama
59%
(
58 of
98)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
85)
11
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
0
81%
(
47 of
58)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
39 of
55)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
31 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
26 of
85)
93
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(10) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gonzalo Lama
Player
Ignacio Carou
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
9
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
4
85%
(
35 of
41)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
10%
(
1 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
16 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
32 of
85)
87
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
Player
Gonzalo Lama
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gonzalo Lama
Player
Facundo Juarez
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
71%
(
39 of
55)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
16 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco
Player
Gonzalo Lama
68%
(
71 of
104)
1st Serve %
52%
(
66 of
127)
7
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
75%
(
53 of
71)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
48 of
66)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
33%
(
34 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
52 of
127)
122
Total Points Won
109
|
6-7(2) 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gonzalo Lama
Player
Hernan Casanova
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
68%
(
25 of
37)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
47%
(
15 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
50%
(
23 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
45
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 0-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Claverie
Player
Gonzalo Lama
54%
(
47 of
87)
1st Serve %
56%
(
53 of
94)
20
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
10
89%
(
42 of
47)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
42 of
53)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
24%
(
21 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
30 of
94)
96
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(3) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Gonzalo Lama
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve %
69%
(
34 of
49)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
55
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Federico Gaio Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Ignacio Buse
Player
Federico Gaio
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Agustin Tirante
Player
Federico Gaio
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
47%
(
35 of
75)
5
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
6
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
27 of
35)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thiago Agustin Tirante
Player
Federico Gaio
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
46%
(
27 of
59)
4
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
10
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Blaise Bicknell
56%
(
55 of
98)
1st Serve %
58%
(
44 of
76)
7
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
6
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
35 of
44)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
37 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
22 of
76)
83
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefan Kozlov
Player
Federico Gaio
67%
(
64 of
95)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
87)
0
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
1
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
36%
(
34 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
87)
98
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Federico Gaio
50%
(
29 of
58)
1st Serve %
53%
(
21 of
40)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Enrico Dalla Valle
Player
Federico Gaio
74%
(
50 of
68)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Karan Singh
43%
(
38 of
89)
1st Serve %
63%
(
60 of
95)
5
Aces
10
6
Double Faults
5
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
44 of
60)
61%
(
31 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
30 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
95)
97
Total Points Won
87
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mukund Sasikumar
Player
Federico Gaio
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
12
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
88%
(
7 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
6 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andre Ilagan
Player
Federico Gaio
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
0
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Lama Vs Gaio Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
