K. Maamoun
To Win
G. Oradini
To Win
Giovanni Oradini vs Maximilian Figl Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L L W L L W W L
Form
W L L L W W L L W WHead-to-head: Oradini 2 - 0 Figl
They have played 3 sets in total, with Oradini winning 3 and Figl winning 0. The last match between Oradini and Figl was at the M25 Trento, 19-02-2025, First, I.hard with Giovanni Oradini getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
M25 Trento(19-02-2025)
6
3
6
4
Upcoming Match
- / First
ODDS
Upcoming Match
- / Q3
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sherif VS Sun PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
18 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Cirstea VS Cocciaretto PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
18 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Giovanni Oradini
Player
Maximilian Figl
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
||||
| 6-1 ret. |
Stats
Giovanni Oradini
Player
Maximilian Figl
43%
(
12 of
28)
1st Serve %
55%
(
17 of
31)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
4
75%
(
9 of
12)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
39%
(
11 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
36
Total Points Won
23
|
||||
Stats
1
H2H Matches
0
3
Sets Won
0
18
Games Won
8
4
Aces (Total)
3
5
Total Double Faults
10
1:4:58
Average Match Time
1:4:58
51% (42/83)
1st Serve %
55% (47/85)
79% (33/42)
1st Serve Win %
57% (27/47)
49% (20/41)
2nd Serve Win %
34% (13/38)
62% (8/13)
Break Points Won % (Total)
57% (4/7)
53% (45/85)
Return Points Win %
36% (30/83)
100% (1/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (2/2)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
0% (2/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (2/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Giovanni Oradini vs Maximilian Figl Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Giovanni Oradini 2 - 0 Maximilian Figl
- Recent Second Serve Performance: In the past six months, when it comes to the second serve, Oradini has demonstrated their prowess by winning an impressive 51.26% of points, while Figl has shown a slightly lower success rate at 46.97%. It is worth noting that there exists a strong correlation between this particular statistic and the accuracy of match predictions.
- Return Game Statistics: Analyzing their recent form, Oradini has triumphed in 52.78% of their opponent's points on second serves, indicating their astute return game. On the other hand, Figl has displayed an even higher proficiency with a winning rate of 58.52%. Comparing the first serve returns, Oradini has achieved a success rate of 31.61%, whereas Figl has outperformed with 35.82%. These figures greatly influence the prediction of who holds the upper hand in their head-to-head encounter.
- Under Pressure Analysis: When facing critical moments in recent matches, Oradini has successfully saved an impressive 61.07% of breakpoints. Meanwhile, Figl has proven their resilience by saving 58.42%. This statistic holds significant value in terms of making in-game betting predictions.
- Performance Overview: Considering their performances over the past year, Oradini has emerged victorious in 53.85% of their matches (28 wins and 24 losses), whereas Figl has shown a slightly higher winning rate of 54.24% (32 wins and 27 losses). This provides us with an overall prediction overview for their head-to-head matches.
- Preferred Playing Surfaces: Oradini excels on Hard surfaces, boasting an impressive win rate of 63% (49 wins and 29 losses). However, their performance is comparatively weaker on I.hard, with a win rate of 56% (27 wins and 21 losses). In contrast, Figl's expertise lies on Clay surfaces, where they have won 49% of their matches (51 wins and 54 losses). Nevertheless, their performance on Hard surfaces is less impressive, with a win rate of 41% (11 wins and 16 losses).
- Player Levels: In the past year, Oradini predominantly participated in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a prize value of $10K. Impressively, they achieved a 64.71% win rate (22 wins and 12 losses) in this circuit. Similarly, Figl mainly competed in the same tier of tournaments and recorded a win rate of 54.24% (32 wins and 27 losses). However, it is crucial to compare these stats within the context of the event level to accurately predict the favorite.
- Direct Head-to-Head Matches: Oradini and Figl have previously met one time, with Oradini failing to secure a victory, while Figl emerged triumphant. The players have contested a total of one set, with Oradini winning one set and Figl failing to win any. Their most recent encounter took place at the M25 Santa Margherita di Pula on October 23, 2023, on a Clay court where Giovanni Oradini emerged victorious with a 6-1 result.
- Duration of Head-to-Head Matches: On average, previous head-to-head matches between these players have lasted approximately 49 minutes.
- Deciding Set H2H Prediction: In their previous encounters, Oradini and Figl have played a deciding set a total of zero times, with neither player securing a victory. This information is highly informative in predicting the outcome if this match were to go the distance.
- Extreme Pressure Situations in Head-to-Head: Notably, neither Oradini nor Figl has engaged in any tiebreaks during their encounters.
- Opponent Quality Statistics: Over the past 12 months, Oradini has faced opponents with an average ranking of 398.13, indicating a higher level of competition. In contrast, Figl has competed against players with an average ranking of 217.31, suggesting a relatively lower level of opposition.
- Deciding Set Performance against All Players: In the event that this match extends to a deciding set, Oradini has proven their ability to prevail by winning 56% of such sets over the past 12 months. Conversely, Figl has achieved a lower success rate of 37% in all matches played on the professional tour.
- Current Event Head-to-Head Stats: While past player performance holds considerable importance in predicting tennis matches, it is equally essential to examine current event statistics to gauge the form of each player. Please refer to the section below for detailed insights if they have participated in the current event. Additionally, certain players tend to excel at specific events, and this aspect should be taken into account when determining the outcome.
- Break Point Conversion: Recent statistics demonstrate Oradini's ability to seize opportunities, successfully converting 45.76% of their breakpoints. Figl, on the other hand, has displayed an even higher efficiency, converting 51.28% of their chances to break their opponents' serve. This stat is particularly significant when considering in-game live betting tips, especially during breakpoint opportunities.
- If you are intrigued by models that utilize statistical methods to predict tennis matches, you may find this article quite enlightening. However, please note that it caters exclusively to enthusiasts of statistical analysis.
Giovanni Oradini Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Erik Arutiunian
Player
Giovanni Oradini
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
74%
(
54 of
73)
9
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
13 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
26 of
73)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Giovanni Oradini
Player
Alberto Bronzetti
64%
(
69 of
108)
1st Serve %
61%
(
73 of
120)
6
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
4
78%
(
54 of
69)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
50 of
73)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
36 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
41 of
120)
113
Total Points Won
115
|
4-6 7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giovanni Oradini
Player
Michael Zhu
76%
(
66 of
87)
1st Serve %
76%
(
71 of
93)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
48 of
71)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
34%
(
30 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
93)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Seydina Andre
Player
Giovanni Oradini
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
76%
(
73 of
96)
12
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
48 of
73)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
26%
(
19 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
96)
91
Total Points Won
79
|
5-7 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Giovanni Oradini
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve %
68%
(
47 of
69)
4
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
5
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
34 of
47)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
4 of
22)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giovanni Oradini
Player
Maximilian Figl
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adrian Oetzbach
Player
Giovanni Oradini
68%
(
71 of
105)
1st Serve %
68%
(
71 of
104)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
44 of
71)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
42%
(
44 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
43 of
104)
104
Total Points Won
105
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexey Vatutin
Player
Giovanni Oradini
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
34 of
63)
0
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Giovanni Oradini
Player
Andrea Guerrieri
51%
(
54 of
105)
1st Serve %
54%
(
52 of
96)
10
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
37 of
52)
55%
(
28 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
38%
(
40 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
34 of
96)
99
Total Points Won
102
|
2-6 6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Giovanni Oradini
Player
Michele Ribecai
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
4 of
22)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Maximilian Figl Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 3-6 6-3 11-9 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 3-6 6-4 10-8 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Leonardo Cattaneo
Player
Maximilian Figl
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve %
78%
(
14 of
18)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
39%
(
14 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
31
Total Points Won
23
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Giovanni Oradini
Player
Maximilian Figl
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Manel Lazaro Juncadella
Player
Maximilian Figl
66%
(
80 of
122)
1st Serve %
56%
(
64 of
114)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
36%
(
15 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
43%
(
52 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
51 of
114)
121
Total Points Won
115
|
6-7(6) 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | 7-5 4-6 10-6 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
60% (216/147)
Win/Loss
48% (68/75)
57% (479/357)
Sets Win/Loss
50% (161/160)
54% (4185/3616)
Games Win/Loss
50% (1569/1574)
62% (51/31)
Hard Win/Loss
42% (13/18)
61% (135/88)
Clay Win/Loss
50% (53/54)
52% (30/28)
Indoor Hard W/L
40% (2/3)
0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
0.3
Aces Per Game
0.05
1131
Aces Total
84
0.17
Double Faults Per Game
0.13
632
Total Double Faults
197
1:26:2
Average Match Time
1st Match
421.01
Average Opponent Rank
216.48
62% (12015/19225)
1st Serve %
64% (2359/3702)
69% (8299/12015)
1st Serve Win %
59% (1394/2359)
50% (3571/7208)
2nd Serve Win %
46% (614/1343)
42% (813/1947)
Break Points Won % (Total)
46% (179/385)
40% (7724/19226)
Return Points Win %
41% (1473/3557)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
45% (37/46)
Challenger W/L
0% (0/0)
64% (179/99)
Futures W/L
48% (68/75)
59% (213/359)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
49% (67/138)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
49% (49/99)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
59% (19/32)
56% (64/114)
Deciding Set Win %
38% (15/40)
88% (209/184)
1st Set Won, Won Match
85% (72/61)
12% (209/25)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
14% (72/10)
21% (154/32)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
11% (71/8)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
